Supervisor Evaluation Sample Clauses

Supervisor Evaluation. The immediate supervisor shall evaluate the Unit Member using the evaluation forms negotiated between the District and SCCDAA.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Supervisor Evaluation. A. 1. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a supervisor shall be conducted openly, with full knowledge of the supervisor, by a duly certificated person.
Sample 1Sample 2
Supervisor Evaluation. The Site Supervisor is required to send a final Performance Evaluation to the Assistant Head of Academic Affiars. This evaluation must be received before the last day of the semester in order for a passing grade to appear on the student's grade report.
Sample 1
Supervisor Evaluation. Those Bargaining Unit Members who receive the Form with a total point score of 36 or more on their most recent annual evaluation will receive a one percent (1%) merit increase to their base rate of pay. If a score of less than 36 is received, a merit raise will not be received that fiscal year. Each merit increase will take effect upon the first full pay period following anniversary date. Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.5" Formatted: Font: Bold
Sample 1
Supervisor Evaluation. At the end of your service experience have your supervisor fill out this form Supervisor must fax form back to X. Xxxxx at (000) 000-0000 If you had an exceptional experience this is a great time to ask for a letter of recommendation Turn in the white copy to the Service-Learning office, yellow copy is for your records, and the pink copy is for your instructor Please have the supervisor at your site fax back this form to X. Xxxxx at (000) 000-0000
Sample 1
Supervisor Evaluation. Supervisors should also list major pieces of work assigned to the analyst during the previous 12-month period, whether job expectations were met or exceeded, and areas for training and growth. Feedback should be as specific as possible.
Sample 1
Supervisor Evaluation a. In June of each year Union workers will be invited to complete an anonymous evaluation of the Site Supervisors, the Directors, and the CEO. The results of the evaluations will be tabulated and presented to the CEO for inclusion in the Executive Session Agenda for the next Board of Directors' Meeting. The Labor-Management Committee will develop this evaluation.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Supervisor Evaluation. After reviewing the employee’s self-evaluation, please rate the employee’s performance for each criterion in the evaluation which includes some of the following areas: quality and quantity of work performed, customer focus, initiative, process improvement, work ethic, communication, adherence to County policies, overall achievement of business results, supporting effective teams, and employee development. There is also a section for employees supervising others that includes: develops and communicates performance expectations, monitors job performance, effectively communicates performance results, provides timely evaluations, and recognizes individual accomplishments. If you rate the employee as a Developmental Performer, you are required to have verbally counseled the employee on the areas you consider below standard prior to the evaluation. If you rate the employee as a Non-Performer, you are required to have counseled and documented the discussion(s) prior to the evaluation. After you have rated the employee’s performance, you will then provide comments in the following areas:  General comments—Provide general comments about work performance. Your comments should include additional feedback or clarify your ratings in this section. You are not limited to commenting only on the criteria included in the work performance section. If you have comments you would like to add about other areas of work performance, it would be important to include them in this comment section.  Strengths demonstrated in past year—Identifying strengths is very important to the person being evaluated. This allows the person to make a concerted effort to continue doing what they do well.  Opportunities for Improvement—As an organization that is committed to continuous improvement, staff must be focused on improving performance. Input from the employee’s supervisor is valuable in this process and helps guide the employee’s development efforts in the coming year. Often, opportunities for improvement identified in the evaluation will help the employee to develop his/her self-development goals. It is important to remember that each employee wants to improve performance and this feedback serves as a guide. When providing comments on opportunities for improvement, be sure they are constructive in nature.
Sample 1
Supervisor Evaluation 
Sample 1

Related to Supervisor Evaluation

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Re-evaluation a) When a job has moved to a higher group as a result of re-evaluation, the resulting rate shall be retroactive from the date that Management or the employee has applied to the Plant Job Review Committee for re-evaluation.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATION 14.1 The purpose of employee evaluation is to support decisions concerning employee discipline, promotion and improvement. Evaluation shall be the responsibility of the immediate supervisor who shall not be a member of the bargaining unit.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Focused Evaluation The Focused Evaluation is used when a teacher is not evaluated using the Comprehensive Evaluation process, and will include evaluation of one of the eight state criteria (student growth impact required). If a non-provisional teacher has scored at Proficient or higher the previous year, they may be moved to Focused Evaluation. The teacher may remain on the Focused Evaluation for five (5) years before returning to the Comprehensive Evaluation. The teacher or the evaluator can initiate a move from the Focused to the Comprehensive Evaluation. A decision to move a teacher from a Focused to a Comprehensive Evaluation must occur by December 15.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.