Traffic Operations. Banedanmark manages traffic on behalf of ØSB. Banedanmark has the coordinating role and final decision-making power with regard to resolving traffic irregularities with or without decreased capacity. Traffic operations are established based on “Principles for operation” published annually by Banedanmark prior to the beginning of the timetable period.
Traffic Operations. The CONSULTANT will gather available data relevant to the current and future traffic conditions in the study area, including weekday peak AM and PM period traffic counts at the intersections of Omaha Street with Mount Rushmore Road, Fifth Street, and Sixth Street to examine current traffic patterns. A weekday 24-hour count will be performed along Sixth Street south of Omaha Street. Seasonal adjustment factors will be applied to estimate maximum peak season potential traffic impacts of the proposed grade separation. The data and seasonal factors will be used to estimate traffic volumes that would result from the closing of the Xxxxx Xxxxxx xxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx intersection, and consider modified traffic patterns resulting from the closure and their impacts on traffic operations at other intersections within the study area. Traffic operations will be evaluated using methodology specified in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2017). The analyses will be used to determine the feasibility of the project in both the short- term and long-term planning horizons. The CONSULTANT will evaluate existing, short-term, and long-term traffic conditions resulting from the project. Traffic forecasts will be developed using generalized growth rates adapted from The Rapid City Area MPO Travel Demand Model.
Traffic Operations. Traffic operations on the main line during irregularities with or without reduced capacity Banedanmark has the coordinating role and final decision-making power with regard to resolving traffic irregularities with or without decreased capacity. Traffic operations are established based on “Principles for operation” published annually by Banedanmark prior to the beginning of the timetable period.
Traffic Operations. Evaluations
(1) Provide traffic operations evaluation on existing traffic signal operations at assigned intersections.
(2) Within one business day of the execution of the work authorization, visit the assigned intersections and provide an initial assessment of the existing traffic signal operations.
(3) Traffic Operations Evaluation Requests may include:
(A) Field observations, including existing signal operations; DocuSign Envelope ID: 33EB1A5F-E628-4D79-9F93-1961767DC631
(B) Collection of traffic counts;
(C) Preparation and implementation of signal timing plans;
(D) Preparation of phasing plans;
(E) Identifying and correcting hardware problems;
(F) Identifying and correcting other operations issues;
(G) Developing system maps and intersection graphics for the Eagle Actra or the Econolite Aries traffic control systems; and
(H) Evaluation of signal operations during railroad preemption
Traffic Operations. The TPO shall consider Traffic Operations projects separately from other projects. Operations projects may be subject to alternate selection criteria. The Transportation Systems Management and Operations Committee shall provide initial recommendations, in place of the Growth Management Subcommittee, to the Technical Advisory Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee and TPO. Traffic Operations projects may not be considered every year, and may be implemented using funds set-aside by the TPO specifically for their implementation.
Traffic Operations. 2.3.1 Review of Travel Demand Model
(a) Provide a high-level review for one Base year CAMPO model, one future year (2042) no-build CAMPO model, and one future year (2042) Build CAMPO models.
(b) Coordination with CDM and Xxxxxx.
(c) Provide review comments in an email. Assumed one verification to confirm that comments were addressed.
Traffic Operations. Traffic operations on the main line during irregularities with or without reduced capacity Banedanmark has the coordinating role and final decision-making power with regard to resolving traffic irregularities with or without decreased capacity. Traffic operations are established based on “Principles for operation” published annually by Banedanmark prior to the beginning of the timetable period. The drafting of the “Principles for operation” is carried out in close collaboration between Banedanmark and the Railway Undertakings and follow the procedure for capacity allocation according to applicable law on allocation of railway infrastructure capacity (paths) etc. The “Principles for operation” are subject to continuous revision during the timetable period and the Railway Undertaking is obliged to participate in its preparation and implementation. The “Principles for operation” do not overrule the obligations of Banedanmark to give notice on infrastructure work under section 7 of the contract. Banedanmark and the Railway Undertaking are bound by the “Principles for operation”. However, Banedanmark reserves the right to make other allocations where deemed necessary. The Railway Undertaking will ensure that staff and rolling stock plans support the general allocation plans. The use of the “Principles for operation” may be initiated by Banedanmark or by the Railway Undertaking for Railway Undertaking’s own trains. The “Principles for operation” include appendices with recommendations on maintenance running. Banedanmark ensures that all Railway Undertakings participate equally in the maintenance running. The parties are under obligation to participate in preparing and implementing the restoration agenda (which includes layout of allocation principles and allocation plans) and emergency timetables. The emergency timetables are registered in the applicable service timetable for S-trains. The parties are bound by the restoration agenda and/or emergency timetables if irregularities occur. However, Banedanmark reserves the right to carry out other allocations where deemed necessary. According to the applicable executive order on allocation of railway infrastructure capacity (paths) etc., Banedanmark can, in connection with traffic disturbances, demand the Railway Undertaking to make drivers and rolling stock available for removal of equipment belonging to other parties or other forms of clearance. The Railway Undertaking will be remunerated by those who are responsib...
Traffic Operations. AECOM shall include a traffic operations study report, signal warrant analysis memo, signal justification report for modification, and a traffic management plan memo for staging/MOT evaluation, including analysis.
Traffic Operations. A traffic memo was drafted on September 20, 2022 (US 1 Typical Section Analysis Memo) as supplemental information and was distributed to the USACE and CAMPO for their review. The intent of the memo was to provide a historical overview of the traffic and design processes that resulted in the preliminary design shown on the December 2021 Public Meeting Maps. No additional analyses were conducted, or decisions made, as a result of the information presented in the memo noted above. The following section includes clarifying information for several key items noted by the USACE. An updated typical section memo will also be provided that supersedes any previous versions. » A 2040 design year was used as part of CP 1 and all subsequent analyses were based on the forecast and operations developed for 2040. Due to the amount of time that has elapsed since the conception of the project (project delays associated with funding, COVID-19, etc.), preliminary projections were developed to gain a rough understanding of the project’s life. 2040 remains the design year and all analyses/decisions were based on 2040 volumes. Additional information is available in Section 4.2 and the data can be reviewed in Table 4-1. » As part of the municipal coordination efforts, NCDOT has agreed to review the 2050 Triangle Regional Model (TRM) when it becomes available in 2023. No wholesale updates to the current design are expected as a result of this review, but NCDOT does anticipate being able to enhance minimization efforts during CP 4A and final design. » XXXx were determined as part of CP 1 to ensure the project maintains consistency with the Purpose and Need, as stated in Section 2.1. o Planning Time Index – Studied in conjunction with the development of the CP 1 Packet and trip times were noted as taking up to four times longer than expected. o Level of Service (LOS) and Travel Times – Noted in the signed CP 1 packet and CP 1 meeting summary that these XXXx should be used for CP 2. Specific LOS requirements were not included as part of the Purpose and Need since LOS is serving as a validation tool, rather than a selection tool, for the design alternatives. Corridor Travel Times along the US 1 mainline and I-540 were used to support the proposed design alternatives (which performed comparably). Based on the build alternatives, travel times are expected to improve by up to 50 percent (future no-build versus future build). Results of these analyses are included in the Traffic Operations...
Traffic Operations. The parties shall comply with the provisions of Schedule 24 (Liaison Procedure) and Schedule 35 (Network Management).
