We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Training Review Sample Clauses

Training Review. The Training Provider must conduct a Pre-Training Review for each prospective Skills First Student, as part of enrolment, or before the commencement of training, to ascertain a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual to enrol in. The Training Provider must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review. The business process must be consistent with the objectives set out in Clause 3 of this Contract. The Pre-Training Review must: identify the individual's objectives for training and the likely job or further study outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; identify any competencies previously acquired (including through RPL, recognition of current competency (RCC) or credit transfer); consider the individual’s: existing educational attainment and capabilities; literacy and numeracy skills; and digital capability where the proposed learning includes portions of Online Training and Assessment; and identify whether the proposed learning strategies (including Online Training and Assessment) and materials are appropriate for that individual and, where necessary, steps to overcome any barriers. The Training Provider must document why it determined the program each Skills First Student enrolled in was a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual, with reference to the information obtained through considering all items in Clause 4.3 of this Schedule 1. The Training Provider must not enrol a Skills First Student in a program that is at an inappropriate level for that individual, including in Foundation Skills Programs that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol an individual assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. If an audit reveals that any Pre-Training Review has not been completed and documented in accordance with Clauses 4.1 to 4.5 of this Schedule 1, then (without limiting the circumstances in which it may exercise such rights) the Department may exercise its rights under Clauses 16 and 17 of this Contract. For the purpose of the Department exercising its rights under Clause 16.2(e) of this Contract in the circumstances set out in Clause 4.6 of this Schedule 1, the monetary amount will be $200.00 per absent, incomplete or inadequate Pre-Training Review. ...
Training Review. The Training Provider must not subcontract any aspect of the Pre-Training Review.
Training Review. For each Eligible Individual, the RTO must conduct a Pre-Training Review of current competencies including literacy and numeracy skills prior to commencement in training. The Pre-Training Review must:
Training Review. For each Eligible Individual, the RTO must conduct a Pre-Training Review of current competencies including literacy and numeracy skills prior to commencement in training. The Pre-Training Review must: identify any competencies previously acquired (Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL), Recognition of Current Competency (RCC) or Credit Transfer); ascertain the most appropriate qualification for that student to enrol in, including consideration of the likely job outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; and ascertain that the proposed learning strategies and materials are appropriate for that individual. The RTO must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review that demonstrates how the RTO determined which qualification/s the student enrolled in and why this was the most appropriate training option for that student. The business process and related documentation used by the RTO to conduct the Pre-Training Review must be made available to the Department (or persons authorised by the Department) for audit or review purposes. The RTO must not enrol an Eligible Individual in a course or qualification that is at an inappropriate level for that student, including but not limited to enrolling students in courses on the Foundation Skills List that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol a student assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. The Pre-Training Review must be completed, and the outcomes known and documented, prior to the student’s commencing training. The RTO must adhere to: the requirements set out in the Guidelines about Fees as issued by the Department and updated from time to time; and any subsequent relevant requirements set out in: a Contract Notification; and/or orders or regulations pursuant to the Act or the National Act with respect to the amount, imposition and collection of tuition fees and other fees for government subsidised training and financial and accountability requirements with regards to student fees (Fee Requirements) as if they were set out in the VET Funding Contract. For the avoidance of doubt: Fee Requirements set out in any subsequent Contract Notification or subsequent orders or regulations pursuant to the Act or the National Act take priority over Fee Requireme...
Training Review. You must conduct a Pre-Training Review for each prospective Skills First Student, as part of enrolment, or before the commencement of training, to ascertain a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual to enrol in. You must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review. The business process must be consistent with the objectives set out in Clause 3 of this Contract. The Pre-Training Review must: identify the individual's objectives for training and the likely job or further study outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; identify any competencies previously acquired (including through RPL, recognition of current competency (RCC) or credit transfer); consider the individual’s: existing educational attainment and capabilities; literacy and numeracy skills; and digital capability where the proposed learning includes portions delivered online; and identify whether the proposed learning strategies (including online learning) and materials are appropriate for that individual and, where necessary, steps to overcome any barriers. You must document why you determined the program each Skills First Student enrolled in was a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual, with reference to the information obtained through considering all items in Clause 4.3 of this Schedule 1. You must not enrol a Skills First Student in a program that is at an inappropriate level for that individual, including in Foundation Skills Programs that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol an individual assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. If an audit reveals that any Pre-Training Review has not been completed and documented in accordance with Clauses 4.1 to 4.5 of this Schedule 1, then (without limiting the circumstances in which we may exercise such rights) we may exercise our rights under Clauses 16 and 17 of this Contract. For the purpose of exercising our rights under Clause 16.2(e) of this Contract in the circumstances set out in Clause 4.6 of this Schedule 1, the monetary amount will be $200.00 per absent, incomplete or inadequate Pre-Training Review. Before enrolling a prospective Skills First Student, you must inform them that their enrolment is under the Skills First Program a...
Training Review. For each Eligible Individual, the RTO must conduct a Pre-Training Review of current competencies including literacy and numeracy skills prior to commencement in training. The Pre-Training Review must: identify any competencies previously acquired (Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL), Recognition of Current Competency (RCC) or Credit Transfer); ascertain the most suitable (as defined at Clause 4.1(a)(i) of this VET Funding Contract) qualification for that student to enrol in, based on the individual’s existing educational attainment, capabilities, aspirations and interests and with due consideration of the likely job outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; and ascertain that the proposed learning strategies and materials are appropriate for that individual. The RTO must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review that demonstrates how the RTO determined which qualification/s the student enrolled in and why this was the most suitable training option for that student. The business process and related documentation used by the RTO to conduct the Pre-Training Review must be made available to the Department (or persons authorised by the Department) for audit or review purposes. The RTO must not enrol an Eligible Individual in a course or qualification that is at an inappropriate level for that student, including but not limited to enrolling students in courses on the Foundation Skills List that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol a student assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. The Pre-Training Review must be completed, and the outcomes known and documented, prior to the student’s commencing training. The RTO must adhere to: the requirements set out in the Guidelines about Fees as issued by the Department and updated from time to time; and any subsequent relevant requirements set out in: a Contract Notification; and/or orders or regulations pursuant to the Act or the National Act with respect to the amount, imposition and collection of tuition fees and other fees for government subsidised training and financial and accountability requirements with regards to student fees (Fee Requirements) as if they were set out in the VET Funding Contract. For the avoidance of doubt: Fee Requirement...
Training Review. The necessary training of employees shall be directed to the hazards of the duties to which they are assigned. Such training shall include hazard recognition, safe working procedures, purpose, use, and limitations of special personal protective equipment required and any other appropriate specialized instruction. The Union Co-Chairman of the Joint Safety and Health Committee and the International Union Safety, Health and Environment Department or a designee shall, upon request, be afforded the opportunity to review the training program for all employees at the Plant level. _____________________ _____________________ Company Union

Related to Training Review

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Training Program It is agreed that there shall be an Apprenticeship Training Program, the provisions of which are set forth in Exhibit "D", which is attached hereto and forms part of this Agreement.

  • Training Plan 19.6.1 An apprentice shall be a party to an individual Training Plan. 19.6.2 The Training Plan sets out the training that the apprentice will do both on – the – job and off – the – job. The Training Plan also sets out how the Registered Training Organisation (RTO) will ensure the apprentice will receive quality training – both on – the – job and off – the – job. 19.6.3 The Training Plan reflects the choices made by the employer and the apprentice in relation to:-

  • Training Programs All employees shall successfully complete all necessary training prior to being assigned work (e.g., all employees will complete health and safety training prior to being assigned to task). Nothing in this Article or provision shall constitute a waiver of either party’s bargaining obligations or defenses. The Employer still has an obligation to notify and bargain changes in terms and conditions of employment with the exclusive representative.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Department Review The parties shall resolve disputes through written submission of their dispute to the Department’s Contract Manager. The Department shall respond to the dispute in writing within ten (10) Business Days from the date that the Department’s Contract Manager receives the dispute. The Department’s decision shall be final unless a party provides the other party with written notice of the party’s disagreement with the decision within ten (10) Business Days from the date of the Department’s decision. If a party disagrees with the Department’s decision, the party may proceed to subsection (b) below.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Classification Review (A) Reclassification Request (a) An employee who has good reason to believe that they are improperly classified may apply, in writing by electronic mail, to their immediate out-of-scope Manager to have their classification reviewed. This may occur when there has been a substantive change in the job functions, when there has been a change in organizational structure that significantly impacts roles, or when a classification specification has been amended in a manner that alters the basis on which classification levels are differentiated. The employee making the request will indicate the reason(s) why they believe their position is inappropriately classified, including the changes that have occurred to the position, organization or classification specifications. In some circumstances, a classification review may be initiated in response to a long standing perceived inequity in how a position is classified. However, where a review has been previously conducted, employees should not request a subsequent classification review unless there has been a substantive change as described above. Submissions must include an approved job description, in the event that a current job description is not available an employee can initiate their written request so as to establish a potential effective date as per article 40.04(a). The manager shall send a copy of the employee’s request to Human Resources without delay, and shall confirm in writing to the employee and the Union that the employee’s request has been received. The manager shall advise the employee of the results of the classification review within ninety (90) calendar days of receiving the request. The notification shall be in writing and include rationale for the decision, specifically addressing the reasons for the review provided by the employee. (b) When reviewing a request for reclassification, the Employer shall follow the guidelines included in the Classification Specification User Manual. Requests are reviewed by the Employer. The evaluation of the role may include an audit of the role, including interviews with the Employee and the Employee’s Manager as needed. (c) Should the employee feel that they have not received proper consideration in regard to a classification review, they may request that the matter be referred to the Internal Appeal Process.