Training Review Clause Samples
The Training Review clause establishes a process for evaluating and assessing the effectiveness or adequacy of training provided under an agreement. Typically, this clause outlines when and how training sessions will be reviewed, who is responsible for conducting the review, and the criteria or metrics used to measure success. Its core function is to ensure that training objectives are met and to provide a mechanism for feedback and improvement, thereby helping both parties address any deficiencies and maintain high standards.
Training Review. The Training Provider must conduct a Pre-Training Review for each prospective Skills First Student, as part of enrolment, or before the commencement of training, to ascertain a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual to enrol in. The Training Provider must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review. The business process must be consistent with the objectives set out in Clause 3 of this Contract. The Pre-Training Review must: identify the individual's objectives for training and the likely job or further study outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; identify any competencies previously acquired (including through RPL, recognition of current competency (RCC) or credit transfer); consider the individual’s: existing educational attainment and capabilities; literacy and numeracy skills; and digital capability where the proposed learning includes portions of Online Training and Assessment; and identify whether the proposed learning strategies (including Online Training and Assessment) and materials are appropriate for that individual and, where necessary, steps to overcome any barriers. The Training Provider must document why it determined the program each Skills First Student enrolled in was a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual, with reference to the information obtained through considering all items in Clause 4.3 of this Schedule 1. The Training Provider must not enrol a Skills First Student in a program that is at an inappropriate level for that individual, including in Foundation Skills Programs that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol an individual assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. If an audit reveals that any Pre-Training Review has not been completed and documented in accordance with Clauses 4.1 to 4.5 of this Schedule 1, then (without limiting the circumstances in which it may exercise such rights) the Department may exercise its rights under Clauses 16 and 17 of this Contract. For the purpose of the Department exercising its rights under Clause 16.2(e) of this Contract in the circumstances set out in Clause 4.6 of this Schedule 1, the monetary amount will be $200.00 per absent, incomplete or inadequate Pre-Training Review. ...
Training Review. The Training Provider must not subcontract any aspect of the Pre-Training Review.
Training Review. For each Eligible Individual, the RTO must conduct a Pre-Training Review of current competencies including literacy and numeracy skills prior to commencement in training. The Pre-Training Review must:
Training Review. You must conduct a Pre-Training Review for each prospective Skills First Student, as part of enrolment, or before the commencement of training, to ascertain a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual to enrol in. You must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review. The business process must be consistent with the objectives set out in Clause 3 of this Contract. The Pre-Training Review must: identify the individual's objectives for training and the likely job or further study outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; identify any competencies previously acquired (including through RPL, recognition of current competency (RCC) or credit transfer); consider the individual’s: existing educational attainment and capabilities; literacy and numeracy skills; and digital capability where the proposed learning includes portions delivered online; and identify whether the proposed learning strategies (including online learning) and materials are appropriate for that individual and, where necessary, steps to overcome any barriers. You must document why you determined the program each Skills First Student enrolled in was a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual, with reference to the information obtained through considering all items in Clause 4.3 of this Schedule 1. You must not enrol a Skills First Student in a program that is at an inappropriate level for that individual, including in Foundation Skills Programs that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol an individual assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. If an audit reveals that any Pre-Training Review has not been completed and documented in accordance with Clauses 4.1 to 4.5 of this Schedule 1, then (without limiting the circumstances in which we may exercise such rights) we may exercise our rights under Clauses 16 and 17 of this Contract. For the purpose of exercising our rights under Clause 16.2(e) of this Contract in the circumstances set out in Clause 4.6 of this Schedule 1, the monetary amount will be $200.00 per absent, incomplete or inadequate Pre-Training Review. Before enrolling a prospective Skills First Student, you must inform them that their enrolment is under the Skills First Program a...
Training Review. For each Eligible Individual, the RTO must conduct a Pre-Training Review of current competencies including literacy and numeracy skills prior to commencement in training. The Pre-Training Review must: identify any competencies previously acquired (Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL), Recognition of Current Competency (RCC) or Credit Transfer); ascertain the most appropriate qualification for that student to enrol in, including consideration of the likely job outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; and ascertain that the proposed learning strategies and materials are appropriate for that individual. The RTO must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review that demonstrates how the RTO determined which qualification/s the student enrolled in and why this was the most appropriate training option for that student. The business process and related documentation used by the RTO to conduct the Pre-Training Review must be made available to the Department (or persons authorised by the Department) for audit or review purposes. The RTO must not enrol an Eligible Individual in a course or qualification that is at an inappropriate level for that student, including but not limited to enrolling students in courses on the Foundation Skills List that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol a student assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. The Pre-Training Review must be completed, and the outcomes known and documented, prior to the student’s commencing training. The RTO must adhere to: the requirements set out in the Guidelines about Fees as issued by the Department and updated from time to time; and any subsequent relevant requirements set out in: a Contract Notification; and/or orders or regulations pursuant to the Act or the National Act with respect to the amount, imposition and collection of tuition fees and other fees for government subsidised training and financial and accountability requirements with regards to student fees (Fee Requirements) as if they were set out in the VET Funding Contract. For the avoidance of doubt: Fee Requirements set out in any subsequent Contract Notification or subsequent orders or regulations pursuant to the Act or the National Act take priority over Fee Requireme...
Training Review. For each Eligible Individual, the RTO must conduct a Pre-Training Review of current competencies including literacy and numeracy skills prior to commencement in training. The Pre-Training Review must: identify any competencies previously acquired (Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL), Recognition of Current Competency (RCC) or Credit Transfer); ascertain the most suitable (as defined at Clause 4.1(a)(i) of this VET Funding Contract) qualification for that student to enrol in, based on the individual’s existing educational attainment, capabilities, aspirations and interests and with due consideration of the likely job outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; and ascertain that the proposed learning strategies and materials are appropriate for that individual. The RTO must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review that demonstrates how the RTO determined which qualification/s the student enrolled in and why this was the most suitable training option for that student. The business process and related documentation used by the RTO to conduct the Pre-Training Review must be made available to the Department (or persons authorised by the Department) for audit or review purposes. The RTO must not enrol an Eligible Individual in a course or qualification that is at an inappropriate level for that student, including but not limited to enrolling students in courses on the Foundation Skills List that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol a student assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. The Pre-Training Review must be completed, and the outcomes known and documented, prior to the student’s commencing training. The RTO must adhere to: the requirements set out in the Guidelines about Fees as issued by the Department and updated from time to time; and any subsequent relevant requirements set out in: a Contract Notification; and/or orders or regulations pursuant to the Act or the National Act with respect to the amount, imposition and collection of tuition fees and other fees for government subsidised training and financial and accountability requirements with regards to student fees (Fee Requirements) as if they were set out in the VET Funding Contract. For the avoidance of doubt: Fee Requirement...
Training Review. The necessary training of employees shall be directed to the hazards of the duties to which they are assigned. Such training shall include hazard recognition, safe working procedures, purpose, use, and limitations of special personal protective equipment required and any other appropriate specialized instruction. The Union Co-Chairman of the Joint Safety and Health Committee and the International Union Safety, Health and Environment Department or a designee shall, upon request, be afforded the opportunity to review the training program for all employees at the Plant level. _____________________ _____________________ Company Union