Underperformance Sample Clauses

Underperformance. 6.1 Subject to any event of Force Majeure, upon the determination of Underperformance in accordance with this Section 6, the Purchaser shall have the option to assume management control of the Company in a manner set out in Clause 6.3 below and the Founders will forthwith cease to have authority over the Business and the provisions of Clause 5 of this Agreement would cease to be effective,. The determination of the annualised Net Income of the Company under this Section 6 shall be made on the basis of past business practises and Management Information Systems adopted by the Company prior to March 31, 2007 as agreed between the Founders and the Purchaser. 6.2 For the purpose of this Section 6, “Underperformance” shall mean the following:
Sample 1Sample 2
Underperformance. 97.1 Under this clause, procedures are established for managing underperformance by an employee. 97.2 This clause applies to all employees, except casual employees. In applying these procedures to officers on probation, or fixed term employees who have been engaged for a continuous unbroken period of less than two years, the head of service may determine that procedures and practices throughout Clause 97 may be applied on an appropriate basis according to the circumstances of the case, and in accordance with the principles of procedural fairness and natural justice. 97.3 The objectives of these procedures are to: (a) provide advice and support to an employee whose performance is below standard; and (b) to provide a fair, prompt and transparent framework for action to be taken where an employee continues to perform below expected standard. 97.4 Consistent with good management practice, concerns about unsatisfactory work performance should be raised by the manager with the employee at the time that the concerns arise. The manager should offer advice and support to the employee to overcome these concerns. The manager should inform the employee that the following procedures might be invoked if the work performance continues to be unsatisfactory. 97.5 These procedures must be applied in accordance with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness and in a manner that promotes the values and general principles of the ACTPS. 97.6 In order to ensure that these procedures operate in a fair and transparent manner, the manager will be responsible for making written or audio records of all relevant discussions under these procedures. The employee must be given the opportunity to comment on any records before signing them. 97.7 The Directorate must adhere to record keeping and record disposal requirements of the TR Act and the associated Territory Administrative Records Disposal Schedule. 97.8 Where a manager considers that an employee‘s work performance is not satisfactory and the manager has previously discussed concerns about the employee‘s performance with the employee and the problem continues or recurs, the manager will inform the employee in writing of this assessment and the reasons for it. The employee will be invited by the manager to provide the manager with written comments on this advice, including any reasons that may have contributed to the recent standard of work performance of the employee. 97.9 After taking into account the comments from ...
Sample 1
Underperformance. In no event shall City be penalized for underperformance or non- performance, other than to have future and/or event-month payments reduced to reflect Delivered Capacity.
Sample 1
Underperformance. 23.1. Underperformance will be dealt with in accordance with the Ombudsman's Performance Development Program.
Sample 1
Underperformance. In the event Customer underperforms or fails to perform during a Test Event(s) or Demand Response Event(s), Customer’s Capacity Payments will be reduced by the applicable Underperformance Adjustment set forth above and such Underperformance Adjustment, if any, shall be offset against EnerNOC’s payments to Customer. In no event shall Customer be required to return previously distributed payments to EnerNOC, provided, however, that EnerNOC will reduce Customer’s future payments to account for any Underperformance Adjustment and that the portion, if any, of such Underperformance Adjustment that exceeds EnerNOC’s payments to Customer for a given Delivery Year may be carried over by EnerNOC to subsequent Delivery Years.
Sample 1
Underperformance 
Sample 1

Related to Underperformance

  • Unsatisfactory Performance All work performed by the Contractor is expected to be done in the most expeditious and professional manner as specified in Section 5 of this document, while also complying with the workmanlike standard clause contained at Section 5.4.1.

  • Performance Excused The Affected Party, to the extent rendered unable to perform its obligations or part thereof under this Agreement as a consequence of the Force Majeure Event shall be excused from performance of the obligations. Provided that, the excuse from performance shall be of no greater scope and of no longer duration than is reasonably warranted by the Force Majeure Event. Provided further, nothing contained herein shall absolve the Affected Party from any payment obligations accrued prior to the occurrence of the underlying Force Majeure Event.

  • Substantial Performance This Contract shall be deemed to be substantially performed only when fully performed according to its terms and conditions and any written amendments or supplements.

  • Work Performance Xxxxxx agrees that all Services performed hereunder shall be performed on a best effort basis by employees, students, faculty, graduate assistants and staff having an appropriate experience and skill level and in compliance with the statement of work.

  • Contract Performance C19.1 The Contractor shall ensure that: C19.1.1 the Goods conform in all respects with the Specification and, where applicable, with any sample or performance demonstration approved by the Authority; C19.1.2 the Goods operate in accordance with the relevant technical specifications and correspond with the requirements of the Specification and any particulars specified in the Contract; C19.1.3 the Goods conform in all respects with all applicable Laws; and C19.1.4 the Goods are free from defects in design, materials and workmanship and are fit and sufficient for all the purposes for which such Goods are ordinarily used and for any particular purpose made known to the Contractor by the Authority.

  • School Performance The School shall achieve an accountability designation of Good Standing or Honor on each of the three sections of the Performance Framework. In the event the School is a party to a third party management contract which includes a deficit protection clause, the School shall be exempt from some or all measures within the financial portion of the Performance Framework. In accordance with Charter School Law, the Authorizer shall renew any charter in which the public charter school met all of the terms of its performance certificate at the time of renewal.

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.

  • Product Performance Contractor hereby warrants and represents that the Products acquired by the Authorized User under the terms and conditions of this Contract conform to the specifications, performance standards and documentation in the Authorized User Agreement., and the documentation fully describes the proper procedure for using the Products. Contractor further warrants and represents that if the Products acquired by the Authorized User pursuant to an Authorized User Agreement under this Contract include software application development, software application customization, software programming, software integration or similar items (“Software Deliverables”) then such Software Deliverables shall be free from defects in material and workmanship and conform with all requirements of the Contract and Authorized User Agreement for the warranty period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance of the completed project (“Project warranty period”). Contractor also warrants that the Products, in the form provided to the Authorized User, do not infringe any copyright, trademark, trade secret or other right of any third party.

  • Software Performance HP warrants that its branded software products will conform materially to their specifications and be free of malware at the time of delivery. HP warranties for software products will begin on the date of delivery and unless otherwise specified in Supporting Material, will last for ninety (90) days. HP does not warrant that the operation of software products will be uninterrupted or error-free or that software products will operate in hardware and software combinations other than as authorized by HP in Supporting Material.

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).