Worked Example. The following worked example is provided for illustrative purposes only and is based on cost estimates prepared at September 1984 prices and on incremental water allocations given in Section B.2 of Annex 3: Total Cost of Driekoppies Dam TD = R 104.7 million Total Cost of Maguga Dam TM = R 138.3 million Hence: Total Cost T = R 243.0 million cubic hectometres per year South Africa: incremental water allocation ir = 111.0 Swaziland: incremental water allocation is = 72.6 Hence: Total incremental water allocation it = 183.6 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx's share of the Total Cost expressed as proportion of the cost of Maguga Dam is given by: Ss = T TM x (0.06589 + 0.401 x is ) it = 243.0 x (0.06589 + 0.401 x 72.6 ) 138.3 183.6 = 243.0 x (0.06589 + 0.15857) = 243.0 x 0.22446 138.3 = 0.39438 Accordingly South Africa's share of the Total Cost of Maguga Dam (1-Ss) is 0.60562. A. WATER ALLOCATIONS A.1 HIGH ASSURANCE The total allocations of water (in cubic hectometres per year - hm3/a) at High Assurance stated in Article 12(2) have been derived as follows: EXISTING PROVISION TOTAL (1981) FOR FUTURE South Africa: Upstream of Vygeboom Dam 134.51 0.0 134.5 Other 5.52 17.8 23.3 Sub-total South Africa 140.0 17.8 157.8 Swaziland: 10.967 4.2 15.1 Total 150.9 22.0 172.9 A.2 LOW ASSURANCE The total allocations of water (in cubic hectometres per year) at Low Assurance stated in Article 12(2) have been derived as follows: EXISTING PROVISION TOTAL (1981) FOR FUTURE South Africa: Upstream of Vygeboom Dam 23.83 0.0 23.8 Other 260.24 97.0 357.2 Sub-total South Africa 284.0 97.0 381.0 Swaziland: 177.2 83.0 260.2 Total 461.2 180.0 641.2 1 As stated in Article 12(11)(a). 2 Excludes mean evaporation losses from Nooitgedacht and Vygeboom Dams (7.5 hm3/a) and Sand River Dam (4.0 hm3/a). Together with Maguga Dam (3.8 hm3/a) and Driekoppies Dam (7.4 hm3/a), total evaporation losses are estimated to be approximately ...(text unreadable).

Worked Example assumes Trust funds $5.4 million US and PTC does not elect to defer payment of the Phase 3 milestone:

Worked Example assumes Trust funds $5 million and PTC defers at both Phase 1 and Phase 3: (1) Phase 1 milestone amount = $[**] (deferred as provided below) (2) Phase 2 milestone amount = $[**] (3) Phase 3 milestone amount = $[**] (deferred as provided below) (4) Regulatory Approval milestone amount = $[**] (5) Total of all milestone amounts = $[**]

Worked Example. If you are a Grade V or equivalent currently working 32.5 hours per week (net of rest breaks) and you are in a Grade represented by a Union who have signed up to the Haddington Road Agreement then with effect from 1 July 2013 your working hours increase to 34 hours 45 minutes per week (net of rest breaks). With effect from 1 July 2015 your working hours increase again to 35 hours per week (net of rest breaks). If you get promoted from Grade V to any Grade on or after 1 July 2013 then a working week of 37 hours (net of rest breaks) will apply.

Worked Example. 2.1 Assume the 2015 Landfill Development Consent approves an expansion to the capacity of the landfill at LHRRP in the amount of 7.5 million cubic metres. On that basis: Original Capacity = 16,225,000 tonnes Additional Capacity = 7,500,000 tonnes Total Capacity = 23,725,000 tonnes 2.2 Assume that by 30 November 2030, the total number of tonnes of Landfill Waste landfilled at LHRRP in the period after 1 July 2014 reaches 23,725,000 tonnes. That is, the Total Capacity has been used. 2.3 Assume that further Landfill Waste is received as follows: December 2030 56,000 12.84 721,787 January 2031 75,000 13.23 992,250 February 2031 83,000 13.23 1,098,090 March 2031 80,000 13.23 1,058,400 The amount for December 2030 ($721,787) will be paid on or before 28 February 2031. The amount for January 2031, February 2031 and March 2031 ($3,148,740) will be paid on or before 31 May 2031. SITA and WSN are committed to best practice, prevention, mitigation and rectification of the operation and management of the LHRRP and post closure management obligations. SITA will provide Council with monthly, quarterly and yearly reports regarding environmental and other aspects of LHRRP. The reports to be provided by SITA are set out in Exhibit 1.

Worked Example. If Average AUM for the month of January 2017 is $10 million, the Fees for January 2017 will be $3000 divided by twelve months which equals $250 plus any of the fees and charges referred to below.

Worked Example. The notice set out below would have been given in relation to a rent review in November 2012 in the following circumstances: The Lease had Rent Review Dates on 30 November in 2011 and 2012; As at November 2012, the Leaseholder’s share in the Premises was 45%; The Gross Rent in November 2011 had been £100 per month (based on the RPI in September 2011), and so the actual rent payable would have been £55 per month (being 55% of £100). The RPI was 237.9 in September 2011, and 244.2 in September 2012. The reviewed Gross Rent as at [30 November 2012] is therefore [£103.15] per month (being (£100 x ) + 0.005) Key Information for Shared Owners Restart Numbering Applied This note is intended as a brief guide for Leaseholders (i.e. shared owners) of the key provisions of the Shared Ownership Lease. How does Shared Ownership Work? Under a shared ownership lease, the Leaseholder buys a ‘share’ of the property and pays rent on the remaining share of the property (which remains in the ownership of the Landlord). The Leaseholder can buy further shares in the property (up to the Maximum Percentage in Protected Areas) at the market value of those shares at the time of purchase. Buying further shares is referred to as ‘staircasing’. As the Leaseholder buys further shares, the rent will be reduced proportionately to reflect the fact that the Landlord’s interest in the property has reduced. Standard Lease Obligations Although initially the property is not owned outright, the Leaseholder does have the normal responsibilities of a full owner. This means, for example, that the Leaseholder will be obliged to pay 100% of the outgoings relating to the property and to keep the property in good and substantial repair and condition. The lease also contains other ‘standard’ obligations on the Leaseholder. For example, the Leaseholder will: if applicable, need to contribute towards the costs incurred by the Landlord in providing services (sometimes known as service charges); need to seek the Landlord’s consent before making certain alterations; and comply with regulations relating to the management of the building or the estate of which the property forms part. Rent Review The rent will be reviewed periodically at the times set out in the lease. Typically, the rent will be reviewed every year. The reviewed rent will be increased in line with any proportionate increases in the retail prices index (RPI). The rent will be reviewed on an ‘upwards only’ basis. This means that the level of re...

Worked Example. An Other SOW is entered into on March 2016 with a duration of 7 months. Fees payable under it are $4M. Service Provider's aggregate liability for all causes of action under the Other SOW arising in the first (and only) SOW Year is 1.5 x $4M = $6M.

Worked Example if the Operational Hours for a fault are 0800-1800, then the clock stops measuring Fix Time at 1800 in the evening and restarts at 0800 the following day). Fix times for Severity 1 Service Incidents and Severity 2 Service Incidents shall be measured 24x7. The Supplier shall measure Fix Times as part of its service management responsibilities and report periodically to the Authority on Fix Times as part of the Performance Monitoring Report. For the purposes of this Paragraph 0, the following expressions shall have the meanings set opposite them below:

Worked Example Sample Clauses

Filter & Search

Related Clauses

Parent Clauses

Sub-Clauses