Bus Behavior Management Sample Clauses

Bus Behavior Management. MPS and the Contractors servicing MPS realize the importance of an effective student bus behavior management program. The parties realize that to be effective in addressing student behavior problems, the program must be flexible and adaptive. Contractors agree to support MPS in its efforts to enforce and make changes, as needed, to the MPS Bus Behavior Management Program. It is understood by Contractors and MPS that qualitative and statistical data will be gathered by MPS through its HEAT program and other sources in an effort to evaluate the effectiveness of the MPS Bus Behavior Management Program. MPS agrees to share this evaluative data with Contractors at frequent intervals throughout the school year so that Contractors may react to improve upon any perceived problems. Student behavior infractions are broken down into three categories: Tier # 1 Offenses (Minor), Tier # 2 Offenses (Severe) and Tier # 3 Offenses (Emergency) Tier # 1 (Minor) Offenses: Tier # 2 (Severe) Offenses: Tier # 3 (Emergency) Offenses: • Unacceptable Language – Profanity • Disruptive Horseplay • Out of Seat/Standing • Willful Disrespect to School Bus Driver – Verbal • Willful Damage to School Bus Property – Vandalism • Throwing Objects in Bus or Out Window/Littering • Running in the Aisles • Yelling/Excessive Noise on Bus • Other: • Fighting • Exited via Emergency Door • Bullying/Hazing • Other: • Injury to Student, Bus Driver or Citizen • Significant damage to bus or other propertyPossession of a weaponControlled SubstanceSexual Misconduct/Assault Contractor responsibilities under the MPS Bus Behavior Management Plan are as follows:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Bus Behavior Management. It is understood by bus contractors and MPS that qualitative and statistical data will be gathered by the district through its HEAT program and other sources in an effort to evaluate the effectiveness of the MPS Bus Behavior Management Program. MPS agrees to share this evaluative data with contractors at frequent intervals throughout the school year so that contractors may react to improve upon any perceived problems. Companies will be evaluated on four (4) criteria. They are:
Bus Behavior Management. It is understood by bus contractors and MPS that qualitative and statistical data will be gathered by the district through its iHEAT program and other sources in an effort to evaluate the effectiveness of the MPS Bus Behavior Management Program. MPS agrees to share this evaluative data with contractors at frequent intervals throughout the school year so that contractors may react to improve upon any perceived problems. Contractors and the district will work through the contractor subcommittee to evaluate the data with the purpose of continual improvement to the program. Companies will be evaluated on three criteria. They are:
Bus Behavior Management. It is understood by bus contractors and MPS that qualitative and statistical data will be gathered by the district through its HEAT program and other sources in an effort to evaluate the effectiveness ofthe MPS Bus Behavior Management Program. MPS agrees to shai·e this evaluative data with contractors at frequent intervals throughout the school year so that contractors may react to improve upon any perceived problems. Companies will be evaluated on four (4) criteria. They are: (ATTACHMENT 4) ACTION ON THE AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION Contract Requisition Number: CR05553l Contract Number: C030645 Vendor Number: V031963

Related to Bus Behavior Management

  • Labour Management (a) No employee or group of employees will undertake to represent the Union at meetings with the University without the proper authorization of the Union. Neither will the University meet with any employee or group of employees undertaking to represent the Union without the authorization of the Union. In representing an employee or group of employees, an elected or appointed representative of the Union will speak for the Union.

  • Leadership Develop strong joint leadership, shift to coaching style of leadership and share information, including financial data.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Labour Management Committee (a) Where the parties mutually agree that there are matters of mutual concern and interest that would be beneficial if discussed at a Labour-Management Committee Meeting during the term of this Agreement, the following shall apply.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.