CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Sample Clauses

CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. The Consultant’s performance will be evaluated by the City at the conclusion of the contract. The Evaluation template can be viewed xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/contracting/docs/ccPE.doc.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (27)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. The State will evaluate the Consultant’s and/or subconsultants’ performance for work provided.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. 43 The performance of the ROMS team as a whole will be subject to routine evaluation by the PPMU in consultation with the CPMU on an annual basis. The continuation of the contract will be based on the annual performance evaluation of CPMU which may recommend changes to the team structure and/or personnel or termination of the contract in the case of unacceptable performance. The CPMU assisted by the CMAC will develop a system (forms and procedures) for overall performance assessment which will be made available to the PPMUs and the ROMS firm. The ROMS is required to undertake an annual review of its 43 No Change
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. 48.1. The purpose of the CONSULTANT Performance Evaluation is to:
Sample 1
CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. 48.4.1. The Contract Manager shall complete a CONSULTANT Performance Evaluation in accordance to Consultant Performance Evaluation Schedule using the CONSULTANT Performance Evaluation (CPE) form.
Sample 1
CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. The Consultant is advised that a performance 10 AGREEMENT-GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES evaluation of the work and or services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.10 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for the review of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project Schedule. 2.11 [Intentionally Omitted] 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant w...
Sample 1
CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. The Federal Highway Administration requires contracting agencies to perform an evaluation summarizing the consultant’s performance on a contract. Consultant performance evaluations provide continuous feedback for improvements and a record of past performance for the selection process on future projects. Interim evaluations provide periodic constructive feedback, encourage communication and bring about continuous improvement. These interim evaluations also provide a record of the consultant’s performance for completing the final evaluation. This is especially important when the evaluator is not the original agreement administrator. Interim evaluations should be completed on the Professional Agreement Invoice and Progress Report (ITD-771 form) each month. When the ITD-771 is completed by the agreement administrator, the consultant must be provided a copy and an opportunity to provide a written response. In connection with written interim evaluations, meetings may be held when needed. The ITD-2759 (Consultant Services Performance Evaluation) form has been developed to provide an objective and consistent method for measuring consultant performance. When the work of the agreement is completed, the Agreement Administrator will rate the consultant’s performance, using the ITD-2759. The consultant shall be provided a copy of the performance evaluation and given an opportunity to provide a written response to be attached to the evaluation. Completed performance evaluations shall be sent to Consultant Services to be archived for use in future consultant selections.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Purpose: To provide the policy and procedures for assessing employee performance and communicating the results of assessment to the employee and to others using assessment information in personnel decisions, and further to express the mutual commitment of the parties to the University’s values.

  • Employee Performance Evaluations Any employee performance evaluation shall be prepared by the employee's supervisor who has the responsibility and authority to prepare such reports. Employee performance evaluation reports shall be discussed with the employee prior to finalization of each category of the report. An employee will receive an appointment with his/her department's reviewing officer to discuss the evaluation by signing the evaluation form in the space provided. Each department shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the reviewing officer for this purpose has not been a party to the preparation of the evaluation. In no case shall the reviewing officer sign the evaluation form until a review has occurred. Any regular or special evaluation with a rating of "unsatisfactory" shall include plans for employee development. Except in cases of termination, release from probation, or leave of absence, employees who receive an unsatisfactory performance evaluation must receive a follow-up evaluation. The follow-up evaluation shall cover a period of time no greater than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final review of the initial unsatisfactory evaluation. An employee shall have the right to submit written comments regarding any evaluation and to have such comments included in his/her personnel file along with the evaluation.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Contractor Performance Evaluations The Contract Administrator will evaluate Contractor’s performance as often as the Contract Administrator deems necessary throughout the term of the contract. This evaluation will be based on criteria including the quality of goods or services, the timeliness of performance, and adherence to applicable laws, including prevailing wage and living wage. City will provide Contractors who receive an unsatisfactory rating with a copy of the evaluation and an opportunity to respond. City may consider final evaluations, including Contractor’s response, in evaluating future proposals and bids for contract award.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!