Dissertation Overview Sample Clauses

Dissertation Overview is an overview of TCK literature that criticizes its Eurocentric focus and lack of power analysis. Then I briefly review human developmental theories in relation to TCK identity formation processes and the significance of narrative identity as a central concept and tool in this study. Reviewing theological literature on identity and pastoral theological literature on TCKs, I explain how narrative and postcolonial pastoral theological approaches can help increase contextual clarity and care in both moments of understanding and misunderstanding.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Dissertation Overview. The goal of my dissertation research was to explore early lupus subtypes. If the purpose of a study is to investigate heretofore undescribed subtypes, the number of clusters of the best partition for a given cluster analysis method will create is unknown. Therefore, when using cluster analysis methods that require a pre-specified number of clusters to create homogeneous sub-groups, the first step in the analysis of real data is to create partitions for a range of numbers of clusters. Next, the “best” partition is selected from the range of partitions created, a process often called “choosing the correct number of clusters.” The clusters of this partition serve as candidate clusters, or candidate subtypes. Last, the meaningfulness of the candidate clusters is assessed by examining associations with patient characteristics, etiologic risk factors, and clinical outcomes. , , Step 1. Create partitions for Step 3. a range of numbers of clusters. - Choose the “best” partition. Are clusters associated with “external” variables? \ J \ J (demographic, outcomes) \ J
Dissertation Overview. This dissertation explores how NCLB impacts teachers‘ work experiences in six subsequent chapters. In the second chapter, I present a theoretical framework for understanding how teachers make sense of their work under distinct NCLB structural conditions. I build this framework drawing on theory of the structure of schools, workplace culture within schools, and organizational identity and sensemaking. Constructing this framework across levels of analysis allows me to link macro structures with micro-level processes. Specifically, I explore how dual perspectives on the structure of schools support the generation of a unique workplace culture. This culture, in turn, frames the sensemaking process for teachers and highlights the importance of identity and work meaning across several domains. Chapter three contains a detailed overview of the research design, data, and analysis. Utilizing a mixed method approach compliments the multi-level theoretical framework. Quantitative survey data offers insight into broader patterns of relationships among NCLB and teachers working conditions. To answer questions of process, I conduct in-depth interviews with 30 educators in 3 Georgia middle schools. In chapter four, I develop a conceptual model of schools under NCLB. Drawing on the data collected from teachers, this model illustrates a dynamic process of sensemaking occurring within schools under NCLB. Specifically, I demonstrate how the policy environment with the varying intensity of sanctions shapes how teachers make sense of and respond to policy. Chapter five presents the detailed analysis of working conditions drawing on both quantitative and qualitative analyses. In accordance with the schools position along the sanctioning spectrum, teachers experience different working conditions inside the school. In response, teachers construct work meaning and develop adaptive strategies in relation to their policy position. These findings reveal the NCLB spurs active change within schools producing both positive and negative outcomes for teachers. In chapter six, I assess the impact of NCLB on teachers‘ job satisfaction and career plans using in-depth interviews. Job satisfaction and career plans are windows to explore the short and long-term consequences of NCLB for teachers. The data illustrate how school position, relative to policy, is a vital factor in teachers‘ construction of job satisfaction and career plans. Similar to working conditions, teachers actively integrate ...
Dissertation Overview. MET is a cooperative of member agen- cies buying water to augment their supplies, but they do not always agree on their rights and obligations as members. In one ex- ample, XXXXX’s desire to use MET’s in- frastructure to move water was opposed by other members unless SDCWA paid a high price. The dispute only ended when the State of California convinced them to stop with a $235 million payment. This dis- pute motivated this dissertation, but the is- sues that emerge from this study apply else- where: Efficient management within mo- nopolistic organizations requires that the goods (water, electricity, roads, etc.) have some form of price rationing—selling at fixed prices can result in excess demand; non-price rationing leads to inefficiency and distortions that weakens these organiza- tions. This case study is a cautionary tale of how even an ongoing and “successful” public organization can suffer from con- flict and misallocation under institutions de- signed for earlier era. The next chapter describes MET’s cur- rent structure and policies. Chapter 3 tells how MET’s world moved from abundance to scarcity, but MET did not. After this his- tory, Chapter 4 shows how the end of abun- dance revealed MET’s inefficiency, and how that inefficiency manifests in conflict and misallocation. Chapter 5 gives details on an experiment that shows member agencies are unlikely to “cooperate their way to effi- ciency.” Chapter 6 has an estimation of the effect of water on land values using 60 years of panel data; results reject the hypothesis that the 1987–1991 drought did not have different effects on member agencies—a nec- xxxxxx (but not sufficient) outcome if MET is misallocating water. Chapter 7 describes how MET could use internal auctions to al- locate water and conveyance among mem- ber agencies and gives results from auction experiments that test allocation efficiency. The last chapter summarizes.
Dissertation Overview. The project unfolds in the following manner. Chapter Two utilizes qualitative data from several in-depth interviews, historical analysis, and secondary sources to explore the organ trade and efforts to combat it in greater depth. After presenting a general framework of the organ trade, the chapter reviews the history of transplantation and the organ trade, and details the emergence and role of the global medical epistemic community, composed of transplantation doctors, surgeons, ethicists, and professionals from around the world. Positioning the global trend toward legislation within its historical context, the chapter illuminates the importance of the transplantation epistemic community, a finding that also emerges within quantitative analyses in subsequent chapters. From inauspicious beginnings, and due to globalization, critical advances in medicine, technology, and the sciences, and a worldwide shortage in organ donations (Xxxxx 1997; Panjabi 2010; Shimazono 2007; Xxxxx 2009), transplantation and the organ trade globalized, eventually occurring within or affecting almost all states and regions. The global epistemic community provided guidance, strategic approaches, and best practices regarding transplantation. Importantly, it also helped position and categorize the organ trade as a significant health, rights, and ethical issue, and something that needed to be addressed. As the organ trade increasingly became delegitimized, states were advised, encouraged, and pressured to adopt legislation banning the organ trade. Overall, the chapter details an important international development, and highlights a worldwide movement that has come to exhibit a marked global influence. Chapter Three presents a brief review of the literature on transplantation legislation, and also outlines areas requiring further understanding. The chapter then turns to social science theories and concepts. Specifically, world culture/world polity theory, rationalization/McDonaldization theory, neighboring country effects, and the concept of government effectiveness are utilized to develop a theoretical framework and derive hypotheses concerning transplantation legislation. Chapter Four offers a detailed methodological account of the project. The chapter describes data and sources, explains variable operationalization and measurement, and reviews descriptive statistics. Additionally, the data analysis strategies used – logistic regression and survival analysis – are discussed. Logistic ...

Related to Dissertation Overview

  • Program Overview Microsoft extends to eligible partners the opportunity to participate in the Program referenced above subject to these Program Terms & Conditions (“Program Terms”). Each entity participating in the Program is hereinafter referred to as a “Participant.” Participation in the Program is voluntary. The Program is governed by the Program Terms, which incorporate by reference the Microsoft Partner Network Agreement (as in effect between Microsoft and Participant, the “MPN Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined in these Program Terms have the meanings assigned to them in the MPN Agreement. These Program Terms are subject to local requirements and may vary by jurisdiction, and Participant retains sole discretion to set pricing for sales of applicable products.

  • Overview (a) The Employer is committed to maintaining a stable and skilled workforce, recognising its contribution to the operation of the Employer. As such, full time direct and ongoing employment is a guiding principle of this Agreement. (b) The Employer will take all measures to achieve employment security for the direct permanent employees of the Employer. The Parties agree upon the measures in this Clause to protect and enhance the employment security, health and safety, terms and conditions of employment and career development of the employees. (c) The employer agrees that it is highly important to ensure that work is performed effectively, efficiently and without undue pressure or bullying, and in a way that promotes OHS and EO principles and practices in the workplace and appropriate representation of employees should they so request. The employer will ensure that its employment practices are consistent with the above principles and practices.

  • FALSE STATEMENTS CONCERNING HIGHWAY PROJECTS T h i s p r o v i s i o n i s applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts. In order to assure high quality and durable construction in conformity with approved plans and specifications and a high degree of reliability on statements and representations made by engineers, contractors, suppliers, and workers on Federal- aid highway projects, it is essential that all persons concerned with the project perform their functions as carefully, thoroughly, and honestly as possible. Willful falsification, distortion, or misrepresentation with respect to any facts related to the project is a violation of Federal law. To prevent any misunderstanding regarding the seriousness of these and similar acts, Form FHWA-1022 shall be posted on each Federal-aid highway project (23 CFR 635) in one or more places where it is readily available to all persons concerned with the project: 18 U.S.C. 1020 reads as follows: "Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, or of any State or Territory, or whoever, whether a person, association, firm, or corporation, knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, or false report as to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of the material used or to be used, or the quantity or quality of the work performed or to be performed, or the cost thereof in connection with the submission of plans, maps, specifications, contracts, or costs of construction on any highway or related project submitted for approval to the Secretary of Transportation; or Whoever knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, false report or false claim with respect to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of any work performed or to be performed, or materials furnished or to be furnished, in connection with the construction of any highway or related project approved by the Secretary of Transportation; or Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or false representation as to material fact in any statement, certificate, or report submitted pursuant to provisions of the Federal-aid Roads Act approved July 1, 1916, (39 Stat. 355), as amended and supplemented; Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."

  • Professional Development; Adverse Consequences of School Exclusion; Student Behavior The Board President or Superintendent, or their designees, will make reasonable efforts to provide ongoing professional development to Board members about the adverse consequences of school exclusion and justice-system involvement, effective classroom management strategies, culturally responsive discipline, appropriate and available supportive services for the promotion of student attendance and engagement, and developmentally appropriate disciplinary methods that promote positive and healthy school climates, i.e., Senate Bill 100 training topics. The Board will conduct periodic self-evaluations with the goal of continuous improvement. New Board Member Orientation The orientation process for newly elected or appointed Board members includes:

  • Agreement Overview This SLA operates in conjunction with, and does not supersede or replace any part of, the Agreement. It outlines the information technology service levels that we will provide to you to ensure the availability of the application services that you have requested us to provide. All other support services are documented in the Support Call Process.

  • CERTIFICATION PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST FIREARM AND AMMUNITION INDUSTRIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has at least ten (10) full-time employees; (c) this contract has a value of at least $100,000 that is paid wholly or partly from public funds; (d) the contract is not excepted under Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.003 of SB 19 (87th leg.); and (e) governmental entity has determined that company is not a sole-source provider or governmental entity has not received any bids from a company that is able to provide this written verification, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 19 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, including a wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary parent company, or affiliate of these entities or associations, that exists to make a profit, does not have a practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association and will not discriminate during the term of this contract against a firearm entity or firearm trade association. For purposes of this contract, “discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” shall mean, with respect to the entity or association, to: “ (1) refuse to engage in the trade of any goods or services with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; (2) refrain from continuing an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; or (3) terminate an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19. “Discrimination against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” does not include: “ (1) the established policies of a merchant, retail seller, or platform that restrict or prohibit the listing or selling of ammunition, firearms, or firearm accessories; and (2) a company’s refusal to engage in the trade of any goods or services, decision to refrain from continuing an existing business relationship, or decision to terminate an existing business relationship to comply with federal, state, or local law, policy, or regulations or a directive by a regulatory agency, or for any traditional business reason that is specific to the customer or potential customer and not based solely on an entity’s or association’s status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19.

  • File Management and Record Retention relating to CRF Eligible Persons or Households Grantee must maintain a separate file for every applicant, Eligible Person, or Household, regardless of whether the request was approved or denied. a. Contents of File: Each file must contain sufficient and legible documentation. Documents must be secured within the file and must be organized systematically.

  • Project Overview Project Title [Drafting note: ARENA to complete. Insert full long name in accordance with ARENA’s naming convention] i.e. [GMS Number] [Powerworks, voltage control on the Pacific Islands Study] [GMS Number] [study/ project/ fellowship/ scholarship/ R&D Project] Contract Number [Drafting note: ARENA to complete – to be obtained from ARENA’s GMS] Recipient [Drafting note: Recipient to insert full legal name and ABN] Guidelines and policies Advancing Renewables Program – Program Guidelines, 2020 (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xx/xxxxxx/0000/00/XXXXX_XXX_Xxxxxxxxxx_XX_Xxxxxx_Xxxxx_XXXXX.xxx) ARENA Variation Policy (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xx/xxxxxx/0000/00/xxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxx.xxx) ARENA Report Writing Guidelines (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xx/xxxxxx/0000/00/xxxxx-xxxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx.xxx)

  • Distance Learning Faculty teaching distance learning classes shall offer virtual office hours as per Article 13.B.7.

  • New Hampshire Specific Data Security Requirements The Provider agrees to the following privacy and security standards from “the Minimum Standards for Privacy and Security of Student and Employee Data” from the New Hampshire Department of Education. Specifically, the Provider agrees to: (1) Limit system access to the types of transactions and functions that authorized users, such as students, parents, and LEA are permitted to execute; (2) Limit unsuccessful logon attempts; (3) Employ cryptographic mechanisms to protect the confidentiality of remote access sessions; (4) Authorize wireless access prior to allowing such connections; (5) Create and retain system audit logs and records to the extent needed to enable the monitoring, analysis, investigation, and reporting of unlawful or unauthorized system activity; (6) Ensure that the actions of individual system users can be uniquely traced to those users so they can be held accountable for their actions; (7) Establish and maintain baseline configurations and inventories of organizational systems (including hardware, software, firmware, and documentation) throughout the respective system development life cycles; (8) Restrict, disable, or prevent the use of nonessential programs, functions, ports, protocols, and services; (9) Enforce a minimum password complexity and change of characters when new passwords are created; (10) Perform maintenance on organizational systems; (11) Provide controls on the tools, techniques, mechanisms, and personnel used to conduct system maintenance; (12) Ensure equipment removed for off-site maintenance is sanitized of any Student Data in accordance with NIST SP 800-88 Revision 1; (13) Protect (i.e., physically control and securely store) system media containing Student Data, both paper and digital; (14) Sanitize or destroy system media containing Student Data in accordance with NIST SP 800-88 Revision 1 before disposal or release for reuse; (15) Control access to media containing Student Data and maintain accountability for media during transport outside of controlled areas; (16) Periodically assess the security controls in organizational systems to determine if the controls are effective in their application and develop and implement plans of action designed to correct deficiencies and reduce or eliminate vulnerabilities in organizational systems; (17) Monitor, control, and protect communications (i.e., information transmitted or received by organizational systems) at the external boundaries and key internal boundaries of organizational systems; (18) Deny network communications traffic by default and allow network communications traffic by exception (i.e., deny all, permit by exception); (19) Protect the confidentiality of Student Data at rest; (20) Identify, report, and correct system flaws in a timely manner; (21) Provide protection from malicious code (i.e. Antivirus and Antimalware) at designated locations within organizational systems; (22) Monitor system security alerts and advisories and take action in response; and (23) Update malicious code protection mechanisms when new releases are available.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!