Evaluation of Qualifications. (1) The placement of each teacher shall be in accordance with the statements of evaluation issued by the Qualifications Evaluation Council of Ontario (QECO) based on Programme 5.
(2) Each statement shall be accompanied by the original QECO covering letter which describes the details of the rating. The original letter will be returned to the teacher.
Evaluation of Qualifications. The placement of each Long-Term Occasional Teacher shall be in accordance with the statements of evaluation issued by the Qualifications Evaluation Council of Ontario based on Programme or as required by the relevant Panel. Each statement shall be accompanied by the original covering letter which describes the details of the rating. The original letter will be returned to the Long-Term Occasional Teacher.
Evaluation of Qualifications. All proposals received shall be evaluated at a public meeting in compliance with the Sunshine law by an Evaluation Committee may request presentations from the firms when a presentation will give the Evaluation Committee an opportunity to determine the qualifications of the proposers and the technical requirements of the proposals. Such presentations are exempt from Sunshine law requirements. The requirements for presentations will be the same for each firm. Negotiations shall not be permitted at any time during the presentations. The Evaluation Committee members, after discussion or presentations, shall assign numerical score for each proposal based on the evaluation criteria, and then rank not less than three qualified firms based on the average of the scores from all Evaluation Committee members. If less than three firms submit a proposal/statement of qualifications, the Evaluation Committee may rank as many firms deemed qualified. The Evaluation Committee will then submit the rankings to the Procurement Manager. The Procurement Manager or his designee will then recommend to the Board that competitive negotiations be instituted with the firms selected. The Board shall exercise its independent authority in accepting the Manager' recommendations in whole or in part or may request oral presentations from the firms.
Evaluation of Qualifications. The evaluation of the Qualifications shall be based on the requirements described in this RFQ. All properly submitted Qualifications will be reviewed, evaluated, and ranked by (“The Owner”). Qualifications shall not include respondent’s fees, pricing, or other compensation.
Evaluation of Qualifications. The evaluation of the Responses shall be based on the requirements described in this RFP. All properly submitted Responses will be reviewed, evaluated, and ranked by the City, with input from the Committee as noted above. The City will contact those Proposers with the top ranked proposals that best meet the City’s needs. The number of selected proposals will be determined by the selection committee. Each of these will be required to meet, virtually or in person, with the selection committee at a time to be specified. The City reserves the right to contact only one company at this stage and to immediately proceed with contact negotiations if appropriate. The proposals will be reviewed in depth with the selection committee at that time. The City will contact the Proposer that best meet the City’s needs and attempt to negotiate an agreement that is acceptable to both parties. An anticipated decision is scheduled to occur by September 27, 2021. The City may evaluate the Responses based on the anticipated completion of all or any portion of the Project. The City reserves the right to reject any and all Responses and re- solicit for new Responses, or to reject any and all proposals and temporarily or permanently abandon the Project. The City makes no representations, written or oral, that it will enter into any form of agreement with any respondent to this RFP for any project and no such representation is intended or should be construed by the issuance of this RFP.
Evaluation of Qualifications. Shills, Abilities & Experience
4.15.1 In evaluating the qualifications, skills, abilities and experience the Employer shall do so in a way that is bona fide, fair, reasonable, non-arbitrary and non-discriminatory The Employer shall not act in developing or applying the above criteria in a manner such as to circumvent the legitimate role of seniority.
Evaluation of Qualifications. The City of Joplin reserves the right, to evaluate each submittal of Qualifications, and to reject any or all submittals, or to accept the submittal(s) that in its sole judgment may be in the best interest of the City.
Evaluation of Qualifications. Properly submitted requests for qualification will be evaluated as to whether the qualification requirements are fulfilled. Contenders that do not meet the qualification requirements will be rejected in accordance with the provisions set out in the procurement regulations. Similarly, public procurement regulations chapter 24 will be applied for assessment of the Contender in general. Provided that a sufficient number of contenders are qualified NRK will, in accordance with the objective and non-discriminatory selection criteria as specified in section 6.7, select a minimum of three (3) qualified contenders to be invited to participate in the competition stage. 8 THE STRUCTURE AND THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL
8.1 DOCUMENTS The proposal should contain the following parts and documents:
I. Signed Cover letter (scanned letter with signature), containing: a. Full name and address, and complete contact information for the supplier, including contact information for the person(s) responsible for the proposal, contract signature and contact person(s) for SSA-L. b. Executive summary of the proposal c. Information of which parts of the delivery any subcontractors/partners are intended to be used d. Client name and contact information for the two most relevant reference projects delivered by the proposed personnel along with a brief description of why the references are assumed to be of relevance for this delivery. e. The Supplier’s statement of their understanding of section 4.7 above. f. Confirmation of abidance period, c.f. section 8.6 below. g. Signature by an authorized person.
II. Appendices to SSA-L, completed by the Contender • Appendix 2: Supplier’s description of the service o Attachment 2-1 – NRK Supplier Security Requirements • Appendix 3: Plan for the establishment stage • Appendix 4: Service level with standardised price reductions • Appendix 5: Administrative provisions • Appendix 6: Overall price and price provisions • Appendix 7: Changes to the general contractual wording (if any) • Appendix 9: Terms for the Customer’s access to and use of third-party deliverables
Evaluation of Qualifications. The placement of each Teacher shall be in accordance with the statements of evaluation issued by the Qualifications Evaluation Council of Ontario based on Programme
