Evaluation Tools Sample Clauses

Evaluation Tools. University will provide forms for the evaluation of Students or develop student performance evaluation tools in conjunction with District.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Tools. The classified evaluation form is appended to this agreement in Appendix G. The parties shall negotiate proposed alternative evaluation forms and tools before they are implemented.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Evaluation Tools. Faculty evaluations tools shall include:  student questionnaires (see Appendix for the student questionnaire form)  chair/peer classroom observation (see Appendix for the course observation form)  course reviews (see Appendix for the course review form)  self-reflection (see Appendix for the faculty self-reflection form)  evaluation of duties by the supervising administrator (see Appendix for the supervisor evaluation form) 8.5.1 Student questionnaires shall be administered every quarter (excluding summer) and for every class taught. They will be delivered utilizing automated student questionnaires via Canvas or appropriate technology. Certain programs may use a different student evaluation tool agreed upon by both parties (see Appendix) If the faculty member disagrees with any student comments, the faculty member shall have the right to place their disagreement in writing and submit it to the Vice President for Instruction. Outside of evaluation years, faculty members shall have the right to opt-out of student questionnaires by submitting a request to the Director of eLearning during the first 30 days of fall quarter or the first 30 days of the next quarter taught if not teaching fall quarter. Opt-out requests must be renewed annually. 8.5.2 One chair/peer classroom observation shall be conducted during the faculty evaluation process, and the observation form shall be reviewed and signed by both parties in a private meeting held to discuss the observation. If the faculty member disagrees with any portion of the classroom observation form, the faculty member shall have the right to place their disagreement in writing and attach it to the form. 8.5.3 Three course reviews shall be completed by the faculty member and submitted to the supervising administrator as part of the faculty evaluation process. Course reviews may be completed at any time during the four-year evaluation cycle. The three course requirement may be waived if the faculty member can demonstrate that they have taught only one or two courses per quarter during the four-year cycle. 8.5.4 One self-reflection shall be completed by the faculty member and submitted to the supervising administrator as part of the faculty evaluation process. Faculty members are encouraged to update their self-reflections annually during the four-year evaluation cycle. 8.5.5 Supervisor evaluations shall be completed by the appropriate supervising administrator in writing and shall be reviewed and signed by both p...
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Tools. The Washington State eVal tool will be used by employees and principals to complete evaluations for employees on the comprehensive and focused evaluation tracks. Evaluators recognize that while some evidence may need to be entered in eVal, many artifacts and evidence may be provided in other formats including discussion. The District will notify the Association if it intends to select a system to replace eVal. OSPI Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Evaluation Cycle
Sample 1
Evaluation Tools. School will provide forms for the evaluation of Students or develop Student performance evaluation tools in conjunction with Placement Site.
Sample 1
Evaluation Tools. Before and after photos demonstrating the improved entrances and use of information board.
Sample 1
Evaluation Tools. Teachers shall be evaluated using the 5D+ Rubric for Instructional Growth and Teacher Evaluation in conjunction with MCL ACT 451 of 1976, Sec. 380.1249.amended. Should the evaluation tool be revised by the University of Washington Center for Educational Leadership, the revisions shall go into effect upon teachers being notified of such changes. Ancillary staff shall be evaluated using a district approved evaluation tool. This shall include, but is not limited to, social workers, counselors, speech and language pathologists, and psychologists. Beginning with the 2024-25 school year, teachers shall be evaluated using the negotiated performance evaluation system, which shall include following: 1. specific performance goals to improve their effectiveness in the upcoming school year, 2. an evaluation of the teacher’s job performance while providing timely and constructive feedback, 3. clear approaches to measuring student growth and provides teachers and school administrators with relevant data on student growth, 4. multiple rating categories that take into account student growth and assessment data or student learning objectives metrics, 5. the use of student growth and assessment data as 20% of the year-end evaluation determination, and
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Tools. The faculty evaluation portfolio and tools shall include the following components found in Appendix K: • Student Questionnaires • Observation of Practice • Instructional Practice Review • Professional Development Plan and Self-Reflection • Annual Service Activities • Teaching Load • Summative Evaluation by the supervising administrator
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation Tools

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Evaluation Software If the Software is an evaluation version or is provided to You for evaluation purposes, then, unless otherwise approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor, Your license to use the Software is limited solely for internal evaluation purposes in non-production use and in accordance with the terms of the evaluation offering under which You received the Software, and expires 90 days from installation (or such other period as may be indicated within the Software). Upon expiration of the evaluation period, You must discontinue use of the Software, return to an original state any actions performed by the Software, and delete the Software entirely from Your system and You may not download the Software again unless approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor. The Software may contain an automatic disabling mechanism that prevents its use after a certain period of time. RESTRICTIONS

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Evaluators The success of a program of evaluation depends upon a high level of skill and training of all participants in the process. The District shall provide annual training on the Colorado State Educator Evaluation System and ongoing training on inter-rater reliability using approved materials from the Colorado Department of Education. As required by Colorado law, all performance evaluations must be conducted by an individual who has completed a training in evaluation skills that has been approved by the Department of Education.

  • EVALUATION AND MONITORING The ORGANIZATION agrees to maintain books, records and other documents and evidence, and to use accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly support the complete performance of and the full compliance with this Agreement. The ORGANIZATION will retain these supporting books, records, documents and other materials for at least three (3) calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY and/or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full and complete access to these books, records and other documents and evidence retained by the ORGANIZATION respecting all matters covered in and under this Agreement, and shall have the right to examine such during normal business hours as often as the COUNTY and/or the State Auditor may deem necessary. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. These access and examination rights shall last for three calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY intends without guarantee for its agents to use reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that related records and documents provided by the ORGANIZATION are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. The COUNTY will, however, disclose or make this material available to those authorized by/in the above paragraph or permitted under the provisions of Chapter 42.56 RCW without notice to the ORGANIZATION. The ORGANIZATION shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities pertinent to this Agreement that the COUNTY finds needing to be conducted.

  • Evaluator Any person designated by a superintendent who has primary or supervisory responsibility for observation and evaluation. The superintendent is responsible for ensuring that all Evaluators have training in the principles of supervision and evaluation. Each Educator will have one primary Evaluator at any one time responsible for determining performance ratings. i) Primary Evaluator shall be the person who determines the Educator’s performance ratings and evaluation. ii) Supervising Evaluator shall be the person responsible for developing the Educator Plan, supervising the Educator’s progress through formative assessments, evaluating the Educator’s progress toward attaining the Educator Plan goals, and making recommendations about the evaluation ratings to the primary Evaluator at the end of the Educator Plan. The Supervising Evaluator may be the primary Evaluator or his/her designee.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • Evaluations A. District management shall direct the evaluation of all permanent bargaining unit members no less than once every two years and probationary bargaining unit members no less than twice per year. Bargaining unit members who have been employed with VUSD for at least ten (10) years and whose previous evaluation rated the employee as meeting or exceeding standards, may be evaluated at least every five (5) years, if the administrative evaluator and certificated employee being evaluated agree. The certificated employee or the administrative evaluator may withdraw consent of this agreement at any time (EC 44664 (a) (3)). B. The written procedures for evaluations that are currently in effect shall be maintained by the District until the bargaining unit negotiates and ratifies new procedures. The present procedures are in Appendix A. They include: 1. The evaluator shall be an immediate supervisor or any other management or supervisory employee, who is designated by District management. 2. Bargaining unit members may utilize peer review in lieu of management evaluation with principal approval. 3. Those bargaining unit members who are regularly scheduled to be evaluated will be notified by the evaluator no later than October 1st of each school year. Such notice will contain a brief explanation as to the procedures for evaluations 4. One-half of the permanent staff will be formally evaluated each year. a. Pre-Conference Guidelines (for Temporary, Probationary and Permanent Bargaining Unit Members) 1. A pre-conference for bargaining unit members to be evaluated will be held by October 31. The purpose of the pre-conference is to review the Standards for Bargaining Unit Members assignment and to determine the evaluation focus. At that time the evaluator and the bargaining unit member may agree that some elements of the standards are not applicable (NA) to the employee’s assignment and may mark them NA at that time. 2. If there is disagreement about which of the elements is not applicable (NA), the parties may invite the Assistant Superintendent of Certificated Human Resources to assist in resolving the differences. The Assistant Superintendent shall recommend alternatives to the unit member and evaluator.

  • ANALYSIS AND MONITORING The Custodian shall (a) provide the Fund (or its duly-authorized investment manager or investment adviser) with an analysis of the custody risks associated with maintaining assets with the Eligible Securities Depositories set forth on Schedule B hereto in accordance with section (a)(1)(i)(A) of Rule 17f-7, and (b) monitor such risks on a continuing basis, and promptly notify the Fund (or its duly-authorized investment manager or investment adviser) of any material change in such risks, in accordance with section (a)(1)(i)(B) of Rule 17f-7.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!