Evaluation Tools Sample Clauses

Evaluation Tools. University will provide forms for the evaluation of Students or develop student performance evaluation tools in conjunction with District.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Tools. The classified evaluation form is appended to this agreement in Appendix G. The parties shall negotiate proposed alternative evaluation forms and tools before they are implemented.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Evaluation Tools. Faculty evaluations tools shall include:  student questionnaires (see Appendix for the student questionnaire form)  chair/peer classroom observation (see Appendix for the course observation form)  course reviews (see Appendix for the course review form)  self-reflection (see Appendix for the faculty self-reflection form)  evaluation of duties by the supervising administrator (see Appendix for the supervisor evaluation form)
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Tools. School will provide forms for the evaluation of Students or develop Student performance evaluation tools in conjunction with Placement Site.
Sample 1
Evaluation Tools. ‌ The Washington State eVal tool will be used by employees and principals to complete evaluations for employees on the comprehensive and focused evaluation tracks. Evaluators recognize that while some evidence may need to be entered in eVal, many artifacts and evidence may be provided in other formats. The District will notify the Association if it intends to select a system to replace eVal.
Sample 1
Evaluation Tools. Before and after photos demonstrating the improved entrances and use of information board.
Sample 1
Evaluation Tools. Teachers shall be evaluated using the 5D+ Rubric for Instructional Growth and Teacher Evaluation in conjunction with MCL ACT 451 of 1976, Sec. 380.1249.amended. Should the evaluation tool be revised by the University of Washington Center for Educational Leadership, the revisions shall go into effect upon teachers being notified of such changes. Ancillary staff shall be evaluated using a district approved evaluation tool. This shall include, but is not limited to, social workers, counselors, speech and language pathologists, and psychologists. Beginning with the 2024-25 school year, teachers shall be evaluated using the negotiated performance evaluation system, which shall include following:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Tools. The Washington State eVal tool will be used by employees and principals to complete evaluations for employees on the comprehensive and focused evaluation tracks. Evaluators recognize that while some evidence may need to be entered in eVal, many artifacts and evidence may be provided in other formats including discussion. The District will notify the Association if it intends to select a system to replace eVal. xxxxx://xxx.x00.xx.xx/educator-support/teacherprincipal-evaluation-program Teacher Principal Evaluation Program Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx'x Framework for Teaching Xxxxxxxxx Comprehensive Scoring Diagram Xxxxxxxxx Framework Xxxxxxxxx Focused Scoring Diagram Framework Evaluation Instrument Xxxxxxxxx Alignment to Washington Evaluation Criteria eVal Resources Frequently Asked Questions OSPI Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Evaluation Cycle
Sample 1
Evaluation Tools. The faculty evaluation portfolio and tools shall include the following components found in Appendix K: • Student Questionnaires • Observation of Practice • Instructional Practice Review • Professional Development Plan and Self-Reflection • Annual Service Activities • Teaching Load • Summative Evaluation by the supervising administrator
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation Tools

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • EVALUATION AND MONITORING The ORGANIZATION agrees to maintain books, records and other documents and evidence, and to use accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly support the complete performance of and the full compliance with this Agreement. The ORGANIZATION will retain these supporting books, records, documents and other materials for at least three (3) calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY and/or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full and complete access to these books, records and other documents and evidence retained by the ORGANIZATION respecting all matters covered in and under this Agreement, and shall have the right to examine such during normal business hours as often as the COUNTY and/or the State Auditor may deem necessary. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. These access and examination rights shall last for three calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY intends without guarantee for its agents to use reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that related records and documents provided by the ORGANIZATION are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. The COUNTY will, however, disclose or make this material available to those authorized by/in the above paragraph or permitted under the provisions of Chapter 42.56 RCW without notice to the ORGANIZATION. The ORGANIZATION shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities pertinent to this Agreement that the COUNTY finds needing to be conducted.

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Evaluator Any person designated by a superintendent who has primary or supervisory responsibility for observation and evaluation. The superintendent is responsible for ensuring that all Evaluators have training in the principles of supervision and evaluation. Each Educator will have one primary Evaluator at any one time responsible for determining performance ratings.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!