FUNDING IMPACT. Define current or potential funding impact, including source of reimbursable funds. Project Manager: Xxxx Xxxxxx CFO/LAND Project Department/Office: December 2020: Board approval of Resolution 2020-45 which authorized creation of a Dedicated Account. SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PARKING FUND BALANCE AGREEMENT WITH PRINCE XXXXXX'S COUNTY
FUNDING IMPACT. This Amendment No. 3 does not increase the budget. The Central Subway Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement / Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (Central Subway SEIS/SEIR) evaluated the environmental impacts of the Central Subway project, including construction of the subway stations. On August 7, 2008, the San Francisco Planning Commission certified the Final SEIR (Case No. 1996.281E). On August 19, 2008, the SFMTA Board of Directors approved Resolution 08-150 adopting Central Subway Project Alternative 3B as the Locally Preferred Alternative, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan. Amendment No. 3 to the Grant and Cooperative Agreement between the City and County of San Francisco and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, as described herein, falls within the scope of the Central Subway SEIS/SEIR. The Central Subway SEIS/SEIR is on file with the SFMTA Board of Directors and may be found in the records of the Planning Department at xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/ and 00 Xxxxx Xxx Xxxx Xxxxxx, Suite 1400 in San Francisco, and is incorporated herein by reference.
FUNDING IMPACT. Budget: Metro Matters & CIP Project: Information Technology Page: 125 & 126 Budget Information: FY09 FY10 FY11 - FY13 TOTAL Budget Amount: $37,925,000 $24,695,000 $34,500,000 $97,120,000 This Action: $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $15,000,000 $25,000,000 Prior Actions: $10,915,000 $3,440,000 $1,920,000 $16,275,000 Subtotal: $15,915,000 $8,440,000 $16,920,000 $41,275,000 Remaining Budget: $22,010,000 $16,255,000 $17,580,000 $55,845,000 The Board approves the initiation and award of competitive procurements for multiple basic ordering agreements for providing Information Technology services in support of major IT initiatives and the exercise of four one-year options. Basic Information Technology Ordering Agreements
FUNDING IMPACT. A. Any such benefit rate adjustment shall not interfere with or have cause to negatively impact Kansas benchmarks for the child care subsidy program which would include a downward adjustment to the income eligibility limit of 185% of the current federal poverty guideline or an upward adjustment of progressive family share deductions (co-payments/cost sharing) currently capped at 10% of the household income.
B. If applicable, the State’s first priority for funding requests to the legislature will be for caseload increases.
FUNDING IMPACT. Approval of the existing Master License Agreements by the Board of Supervisors will bring increased revenues to the SFMTA. Currently, staff estimates that total revenues to the SFMTA from the three existing Master License Agreements will be approximately $13,560,789, over the nine-year terms of those agreements. The Master License Agreement authorizes placement of wireless equipment on poles and facilities under SFMTA control and is subject to the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA). Under the authority granted by the Planning Department, SFMTA staff determined that the Master License Agreement is not a project and is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4) because the discretionary action involves the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact to the environment. Upon approval of the Master License Agreement, the placement of wireless equipment on poles and facilities will be considered a project under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 and each individual installation proposal is subject to review under CEQA. The SFMTA’s determination is on file with the Secretary to the SFMTA Board of Directors. The proposed action is the Approval Action as defined by the S.F. Administrative Code Chapter 31.
FUNDING IMPACT. This Fiber Optic License Agreement will increase the annual revenue for these fibers from $265,566 to $314,668 for a net positive increase in revenue of
FUNDING IMPACT. The 2015 Transportation Sustainability Fee (TSF) legislation granted lower fee rates for projects with development and environmental applications submitted on or before July 21, 2015. Mission Rock is one such project. However, the negotiated agreement includes a commitment to pay a Transportation Fee that is equivalent to the full TSF for all of the development, with the exception of 100% affordable housing buildings. These fees will amount to about $45 million over the phases of the project; the Transportation Exhibit to the DDA sets the fees at the current (2017) rate, with annual adjustments. Per the TSF ordinance, fees will be paid upon City issuance of construction documents for specific phases or buildings. Through the ICA, the SFMTA will recover costs associated with staff review and contribution to the implementation of the horizontal infrastructure. On October 5, 2017, in Motion No. M-20017, the San Francisco Planning Commission certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Mission Rock Mixed-Use Project (Case No. 2013.0203 ENV/PCA/MAP/DVA) (Project). On that same date, in Motion No. M-20018 the San Francisco Planning Commission adopted CEQA Findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and an MMRP. As part of the approval of this item, the SFMTA Board of Directors would adopt these CEQA findings as its own, and to the extent the above actions are associated with any mitigation measures, the SFMTA Board of Directors would adopt those measures, and transportation-related Improvement Measures I-TR-1, I-TR-7, and I-TR-10 as conditions of this approval. A copy of the CEQA determination is on file with the Secretary to the SFMTA Board of Directors, and may be found in the records of the Planning Department at 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx xx Xxx Xxxxxxxxx, and is incorporated herein by reference.
FUNDING IMPACT. Project Manager: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxxx
FUNDING IMPACT. The Contract is funded by the SFMTA’s annual Operating budget. These funds are budgeted annually in the Streets Division Operating budget and cover the annual cost of the Contract. The Amendment will not require an increase to the annual Operating budget. Monthly Contract Costs: • System Equipment Lease $926 per approach per month • Program Administration $2,573.89 per approach per month One-Time or As-Needed Contract Costs: • Construction Design Services $7,834.38 per approach • Construction Consultation Services $728.95 per approach • Third-Party Damage Repairs varies (detailed pricing in Contract) • Tree Services varies (detailed pricing in Contract) From Notice to Proceed on November 6, 2018 to May 30, 2023, $2,833,821.17 of the Contract has been expended. Below are estimated annual operating costs for the additional years requested in the Amendment. Years six to ten include a $286,269.86 contingency per year for unforeseen third-party damage repair and tree trimming costs. Year seven is only an estimate of when the additional 8 approaches might be active.
FUNDING IMPACT. The 2015 Transportation Sustainability Fee legislation granted lower fee rates for projects with development and environmental applications submitted on or before July 21, 2015. India Basin is one such project. These fees will amount to about $10.8 million over the phases of the project; per the Transportation Sustainability Fee Ordinance, fees will be paid upon City issuance of a first construction documents for specific phases or buildings. Through the terms of the Development Agreement, the SFMTA will recover costs associated with staff review of the horizontal infrastructure. On July 26, 2018, in Motion No. 20247, the San Francisco Planning Commission certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the India Basin Project (Case No. 2014- 002541ENV) (Project). On that same date, in Motion No. 20248 the San Francisco Planning Commission adopted California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Plan (MMRP). As part of the approval of this item, the SFMTA Board of Directors would adopt these CEQA findings as its own, and to the extent the above actions are associated with any mitigation measures, the SFMTA Board of Directors would adopt those measures, and transportation-related Improvement Measures I-TR-2V, I-TR-6, I-TR-7, and I-TR-10, and I-C-TR-1 as conditions of this approval. A copy of the CEQA determination is on file with the Secretary to the SFMTA Board of Directors, and may be found in the records of the Planning Department at 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx xx Xxx Xxxxxxxxx, and is incorporated herein by reference.
