General Methodology. Analyzing the potential oil and gas development impacts for LEPCs requires three basic components:
General Methodology. Depending on what type of communication medium Micro-ROS is set up with, the methodology may vary. Of course, the variations are small and related to the topology. In order to achieve benchmarking, the RTOS and the application were instrumented. Depending on the point of interest, different probes were placed in different part of the RTOS. The data format was following a standard called Common Trace Format (V1.8)[2]. This standard is even used in Zephyr (competitor of NuttX). As a matter of fact, the CTF core was ported from Zephyr to NuttX. Data are retrieved and analysed with babeltrace and the babeltrace python API [3]. Every events are timed using an internal free-running timer (in the case of NuttX running on the Olimex STM32-E407 TIM2). Thanks to this the device can have time clock with the resolution of nearly 10 nanoseconds. The current configuration of the resolution is 100 nanoseconds, which is more than enough to measure perforances of the communication, considering that the minimal Ethernet (64bytes) frame at 100Mbps. Using only the timestamped measurements allows to make delta calculation offline. The software configuration is likely to change. However the software role will be kept the same: • Agent running on a PC • Subscriber running on one Olimex STM32-E407, • Publisher running on one Olimex STM32-E407. At a hardware level the USB - CDC/ACM console is going to be used on the Olimex STM32-E407 boards for Ethernet and Serial benchmarkings. For 6LoWPAN the serial USART6 will be used as the console to reduce the memory footprint and execution impact. Hence the USB OTG1 of both Olimex STM32-E407 boards shall be connected to a computer. Additional hardware setup must performed but will depend on the type of topology (Ethernet / Serial / 6LoWPAN):
General Methodology. This section builds on the indication of the Project Handbook, describing general norms and methodologies for networking and best practices for conduction of work in the project, which includes methodologies for quality assurance and monitoring. It includes a summary of the most important methodologies to be used for the project’s internal Work Packages and the networking activities, including some more detailed specifications.
General Methodology. This task will be carried out via all means of communication, as preferred by the people involved, including, mail, e-mail and telephone communication with relevant parties interested. The PREFORMA consortium will be kept informed at key stages via the xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xx general mailing list. It is suggested that, in order to maintain a proper balance in the partnership, all partners should suggest as many contacts as possible. This is also in order to achieve the success indicators.
General Methodology. A five-step Delphi forum process was used to develop understanding of foresight from experts active in the field of nanotechnology. This process was intended to permit an independent synthesis of information derived from leading experts. The steps were:
General Methodology. All procedures were approved by the Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Midsagittally-hemisected spinal cords were isolated from Xxxxxxx–Xxxxxx rats aged from postnatal days 6-12 and were prepared for in vitro experiments as described previously (Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx, 0000;Xxxx et al., 2005) or from mice of the same age from the either the FVB or balb/c background. Recordings were made in oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing (in mM): NaCl 128; KCl 1.9; D-glucose 10; MgSO41.3; CaCl2 2.4; KH2PO4 1.2; and NaHCO3 26. The in vitro preparation allows for exquisite solute and neurochemical control of afferent/spinal cord systems for detailed mechanistic studies on their function.
General Methodology. For purposes of calculating the components of Working Capital the following hierarchy is to be used for all balances:
General Methodology. Zentralblatt MATH has successfully applied methods of metadata enhancements for sev- eral digital mathematics library projects and digitisation initiatives such as RusDML, and working with a variety of partners such as the Library of Lower Saxony and the University Library of Göttingen and the German National Library of Science and Technology (TIB Hannover). The usual mode of operation is the following: Scanning and digitization initiatives carry out the scanning of the printed material and, during this process, attach just a small subset of metadata to the scans, e.g. means of journal identification (journal name, ISSN), volume/issue numbers, and page ranges. Further information, such as author, title, classification, keywords, may be available from Zentralblatt MATH, and automatically be identified and carried over to the scans, thus saving capacities that would otherwise be needed for manually re-typing such metadata. Also, direct links to Zentralblatt MATH reviews of the papers can be attached to the scans. On the other side, the digitization initiative reports back to Zentralblatt MATH about the availability of the scanned full text on the net, so that Zentralblatt can use this information to provide direct links to the full text in the Zentralblatt MATH database. Also, errors inside the Zentralblatt MATH data, and information missing or otherwise unavailable on the side of Zentralblatt (such as translations/transliterations), are reported back.
General Methodology. 5.1 Proposal submissions should outline the resources to be committed to this work by the Proponent.
General Methodology. A Base Year is established (usually the most recent fiscal year). These base patient revenues will be adjusted for price variance from approved rates, for volume variances, changes in differential due to changes in payer mix and any other approved One-Time adjustments. This base year revenue is then adjusted for any special transitional revenue provision to facilitate conversion of the hospital from an 85% variable cost system to a 100% fixed cost system (as is applicable under the TPR constraint system).1 This provision is described in subsection C. In year three of this agreement, the hospital is also eligible for a population adjustment to its overall TPR constraint. The hospital then must provide appropriate and necessary hospital services to its patient population and operate within the TPR constraint afforded it by the HSCRC for all years this agreement remains in effect.
