Independent Scientific Input Sample Clauses

Independent Scientific Input. ‌ The Local Agencies and DFG intend to include independent scientific input and analysis to assist in the preparation of the Plan. For that purpose, a list of potential Independent Science Advisors is being developed by BCAG. The Science Advisors will at a minimum, provide recommendations, advice and guidance to the Local Agencies and DFG on: • scientifically sound conservation strategies for species and natural communities proposed to be covered by the Plan; • reserve design principles that address the needs of species, landscapes, ecosystems, and ecological processes in the planning area proposed to be addressed by the Plan; • management principles and conservation goals that can be used in developing a framework for the monitoring and adaptive management component of the plan; and • data gaps and uncertainties so that risk factors can be evaluated. The Science Advisors will consist of approximately 12 scientists currently being assembled by BCAG, in consultation with the Wildlife Agencies, to provide technical expertise on the affected taxonomic groups, larger scale ecological processes, principles of conservation biology, and conservation and land use planning in practice. The Independent Science Advisors may be asked to provide additional feedback on key issues during preparation of the Plan, and may prepare reports regarding specific scientific issues throughout the process, as deemed necessary by the Local Agencies and DFG. Design and implementation of the science advisory process must be done in a coordinated fashion and with the mutual agreement of the Local Agencies and DFG. The Local Agencies and DFG will establish a funding source and payment procedures. The independent science advisory process will include the development of a detailed scope of work, use of a professional facilitator, input from technical experts, and production of a report by the scientists. In addition, the Local Agencies and DFG will make the report available for use by all participants and the public during the planning process.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Independent Scientific Input. The Parties intend to include independent scientific input and analysis to assist in the preparation of the DRECP. For that purpose, independent scientists representing a broad range of disciplines, including conservation biology and locally-relevant ecological knowledge, convened by the State will, at a minimum: • Recommend scientifically sound conservation strategies for species and natural communities proposed to be covered by the DRECP; • Recommend a range of conservation actions that would address the needs of species, ecosystems, and ecological processes in the Planning Area proposed to be addressed by the DRECP; • Recommend reserve design principles and processes that are adaptable to changing climate conditions and the needs of species, landscapes, ecosystems, and ecological processes; • Recommend management principles and conservation goals that can be used in developing a framework for the monitoring and adaptive management component of the DRECP; and • Identify data gaps and uncertainties so that risk factors can be evaluated. The Parties will design and implement the science advisory process, in consultation with the Executive Steering Committee (see section 8.5 below). The Parties will develop a detailed scope of work for the independent science process and establish funding and payment procedures. The independent science advisory process will include the use of a professional facilitator, input from technical experts, and production of a report by the scientists. The Parties will make the report available to the public during the planning process.
Independent Scientific Input. The Local Agencies and CDFW intend to include independent scientific input and analysis to assist in the preparation of the Plan. For that purpose, independent scientists representing a broad range of disciplines, including conservation biology and locally-relevant ecological knowledge, will, at a minimum: recommend scientifically sound conservation strategies for species and natural communities proposed to be covered by the plan; recommend a set of reserve design principles that address the needs of species, landscapes, ecosystems, and ecological processes in the planning area proposed to be addressed by the plan; recommend management principles and conservation goals that can be used in developing a framework for the monitoring and adaptive management component of the plan; and identify data gaps and uncertainties so that risk factors can be evaluated. The independent scientists may be asked to provide additional feedback on key issues during preparation of the Plan, and may prepare reports regarding specific scientific issues throughout the process, as deemed necessary by the Local Agencies and CDFW. Design and implementation of the science advisory process must be done in a coordinated fashion and with the mutual agreement of the Local Agencies and CDFW. The Local Agencies and CDFW will establish funding and payment procedures. The independent science advisory process will include the development of a detailed scope of work, use of a professional facilitator, input from technical experts, and production of a report by the scientists. In addition, the Local Agencies and CDFW will make the report available for use by all participants and the public during the planning process.
Independent Scientific Input. In 2001, the County contracted with a group of independent science advisors to review computer models, field research data, and potential Preserve design methods for the North County Plan. Their recommendations were summarized in a written report dated July 1, 2001 and resulted in revisions to the modeling process and incorporation of the SITES Reserve Selection Algorithm model. In 2002, the independent science advisors reconvened to review the revisions made based on the 2001 recommendations. Their response to the revisions made to the North County Plan modeling process and their recommendations and input on the Preserve planning process are summarized in a written report dated February 27, 2002. In 2006, the County convened another group of independent science advisors to provide input on the East County Plan. They participated in two workshops (February 2006 and January 2007) and produced a report dated March 31, 2006. County and CDFW anticipate additional consultation with independent scientists as preparation of the Plans continues in order to ensure that Plans are developed using the “best available” science methodologies. The County and CDFW intend to seek additional independent scientific input and analysis to assist in the completion of the North County Plan and in the preparation of the East County Plan. For that purpose, independent scientists representing a broad range of disciplines, including conservation biology and locally relevant ecological knowledge, will, at a minimum:  Recommend scientifically sound conservation strategies for species and natural communities proposed to be covered by the Plans;  Recommend a set of reserve design principles that address the needs of species, landscapes, ecosystems, and ecological processes in the Planning Areas proposed to be addressed by the Plans;  Recommend management principles and conservation goals that can be used in developing a framework for the monitoring and adaptive management components of the Plans; and  Identify data gaps and uncertainties so that risk factors can be evaluated. Design and implementation of the science advisory process must be done in a coordinated fashion and with the mutual agreement of the County and CDFW. The County and CDFW will establish funding and payment procedures. The independent science advisory process will include the preparation of a detailed scope of work, input from technical experts, and production of a report by the scientists. In addition, the Count...
Independent Scientific Input. The Parties intend that preparation of the NCCP/HCP will be guided by independent scientific input and analysis. For that purpose, an independent Science Advisory Panel has been convened by the HCPA. The role of the Science Advisory Panel is to, at a minimum, provide recommendations, advice, and guidance on 1) scientifically sound conservation strategies for species and natural communities proposed to be covered by the plan; 2) reserve design principles that addresses the needs of species, landscapes, ecosystems, and ecological processes in the Planning Area proposed to be addressed by the Plan; 3) management principles and conservation goals that can be used in developing a framework for the monitoring and adaptive management component of the plan; and 4) data gaps and uncertainties so that risk factors can be evaluated. The Science Advisory Panel consists of six scientists and was assembled by the HCPA, in consultation with the Wildlife Agencies, to provide technical expertise on the affected taxonomic groups, larger scale ecological processes, principles of conservation biology, and conservation and land use planning in practice. An independent facilitator supports the work of the Science Advisory Panel by coordinating meetings, framing questions, and assisting with report compilation. The Science Advisory Panel may be asked to provide additional feedback on key issues during preparation of the NCCP/HCP, and may prepare reports regarding specific scientific issues throughout the process, as deemed necessary by the Parties. The HCPA will continue to implement the science advisory process in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies.
Independent Scientific Input. ‌ The Applicant and CDFW will include independent scientific input and analysis to assist in the preparation of the Plan. For that purpose, independent scientists representing a broad range of disciplines, including conservation biology and locally relevant ecological knowledge, will, at a minimum: • recommend scientifically sound conservation strategies for species and natural communities proposed to be covered by the plan; • recommend a set of reserve design principles that address the needs of species, landscapes, ecosystems, and ecological processes in the Planning Area; • recommend management principles and conservation goals that can be used in developing a framework for the monitoring and adaptive management component of the plan; and • identify data gaps and uncertainties so that risk factors can be evaluated. The independent scientists may be asked to provide additional feedback on key issues during preparation of the Plan and may prepare reports regarding specific scientific issues throughout the process, as deemed necessary by the Applicant and CDFW. Design and implementation of the science advisory process must be done in a coordinated fashion and with the mutual agreement of the Applicant and CDFW. The Applicant and CDFW will establish funding and payment procedures. The independent science advisory process will include the development of a detailed scope of work, use of a professional facilitator, input from technical experts and members of the public, and production of a report by the scientists. In addition, the Applicant and CDFW will make the report available for use by all participants and the public during the planning process.
Independent Scientific Input. The Local Agency and CDFG intend to include independent scientific input and analysis to assist in the preparation of the Plans. For that purpose, independent scientists representing a broad range of disciplines, including conservation biology and locally-relevant ecological knowledge, will, at a minimum: • Recommend scientifically sound conservation strategies for species and natural communities proposed to be covered by the Plans; • Recommend a set of reserve design principles that address the needs of species, landscapes, ecosystems, and ecological processes in the planning areas proposed to be addressed by the Plans; • Recommend management principles and conservation goals that can be used in developing a framework for the monitoring and adaptive management components of the Plans; and • Identify data gaps and uncertainties so that risk factors can be evaluated. The independent scientists may be asked to provide additional feedback on key issues during preparation of the Plans, and may prepare reports regarding specific scientific issues throughout the process, as deemed necessary by the Local Agency and CDFG. Design and implementation of the science advisory process must be done in a coordinated fashion and with the mutual agreement of the Local Agency and CDFG. The Local Agency and CDFG will establish funding and payment procedures. The independent science advisory process will include the preparation of a detailed scope of work, input from technical experts, and production of a report by the scientists. In addition, the Local Agency and CDFG will make the report available for use by all participants and the public during the planning process.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Independent Scientific Input

  • Local Professional Development Committee A. There shall be a Local Professional Development Committee (LPDC) to oversee, review, and approve individual professional development plans (IPDP) for course work, continuing education units and/or other equivalent activities. 1. The LPDC shall be responsible to recommend for the Superintendent’s approval, all in-service activities and workshops offered in the district during the school year for staff professional development. 2. Recommendations for District Workshops and In-Service activities should be submitted to the LPDC for approval and recommendation no later than the last school day of the year prior to the year it will be implemented. 3. The LPDC chair shall review and approve all “Professional Growth Reimbursement Application” forms. B. The LPDC shall consist of three (3) teachers appointed by the Association President and two (2) members appointed by the Superintendent. One of the Superintendent's appointees will be a Principal employed by the district. C. Appointments shall be for two (2) years with half of the committee members being appointed every other year. 1. Appointments shall be made on or before May 1. 2. The Appointments shall be made by each party outlined above, notifying the other of those appointed. 3. In the event of a vacancy, the committee members shall be replaced in accordance with "B." above. 4. The Association shall name a fourth teacher member and the Superintendent shall name a third administrative member to serve as alternates and attend trainings. These two (2) people shall act as substitutes when a committee member is absent. D. This committee shall meet monthly. 1. The committee may also be convened by the request of two sitting members. 2. A quorum shall consist of five (5) members. When administrative licenses/certificates are reviewed, two (2) sitting teacher members will abstain and the decision will be decided by three (3) members. 3. If the committee determines it is needed, they will be provided two (2) professional release days to meet during regular school hours. Substitutes will be provided for the committee members on these release days. 4. Committee members shall be provided an additional annual stipend of $1,000 for meetings beyond the normal work day or year. This stipend shall be paid in two (2) semi-annual payments. Any member who fails to serve the full year shall have the above compensation prorated on a monthly basis for each month served. 5. Decisions of the LPDC will be made by consensus of the committee members present. 6. The committee minutes shall be prepared and maintained in compliance with the laws governing the operation of committees of public bodies.

  • Independent Development Receiving Party may currently or in the future be developing information internally, or receiving information internally, or receiving information from other parties that may be similar to the Disclosing Party's Confidential Information. Accordingly, nothing in this Agreement will be construed as a representation or inference that Receiving Party will not develop or have developed products or services, that, without violation of this Agreement, might compete with the products or systems contemplated by the Disclosing Party's Confidential Information.

  • Professional Development Program (a) The parties agree to continue a Professional Development Program for the maintenance and development of the faculty members' professional competence and effectiveness. It is agreed that maintenance of currency of subject knowledge, the improvement of performance of faculty duties, and the maintenance and improvement of professional competence, including instructional skills, are the primary professional development activities of faculty members. (b) Information collected as part of this program shall be the sole property of the faculty member. This information or any judgments arising from this program shall not be used to determine non-renewal or termination of a faculty member's contract, suspension or dismissal of a faculty member, denial of advancement on the salary scale, nor affect any other administrative decisions pertaining to the promotion or employment status of the faculty member. (c) A joint advisory committee consisting of three regular faculty members who shall be elected by and are P.D. Committee Chairpersons and three administrators shall make recommendations for the operation, financing and management of the Professional Development Program.

  • Professional Development Committee There shall be a Professional Development Committee composed of two (2) members of the Association one of whom shall be the Bargaining Unit President or designate and two (2) representatives of the Hospital one of whom shall be the Chief Nursing Officer or designate and one human resources representative.

  • Independent Study A sabbatical leave may be granted for a plan of independent study, research, writing, and/or travel equivalent in time and rigor to a sabbatical for formal study. A detailed, specific plan must be submitted by the applicant and approved by the Salary and Leaves Committee as likely to improve the applicant’s teaching effectiveness, strengthen the College’s academic program, or otherwise bring a clear benefit to students. In addition, sabbaticals for independent study must generate tangible products of use to students.

  • Professional Development Plan Professional Development Plan (PDP) refers to plans developed by faculty members addressing the criteria contained in Article 22 and Appendix G.

  • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT A. The Board of Education agrees to pay the actual tuition costs of courses taken by a teacher at accredited colleges or universities up to three courses per two (2) year fiscal periods from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2008 and July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010 respectively, except as follows: 1. No teacher may be reimbursed for courses taken during the first year of teaching in Vineland. 2. Teachers taking courses in the second and third years of employment in Vineland will not receive remuneration until tenure has been secured. The remuneration will then be retroactive and will be paid to the teacher in a lump sum within sixty (60) days after the teacher has secured tenure. 3. All courses must be pre-approved by the Superintendent or his designee subject to the following requirements: (a) A teacher must provide official documentation that he/she has obtained a grade of B or better; (b) Reimbursement shall be paid only for courses directly related to teacher’s teaching field which increase the teacher’s content knowledge and are related to the teacher’s current certification, as determined by the Superintendent or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion; no reimbursement shall be paid for courses leading to a post graduate or professional degree in a field other than education or teaching. Further, effective September 1, 2010, all newly hired teachers shall not be eligible for reimbursement until they are tenured, and they shall not be eligible for retroactive reimbursement upon gaining tenure for courses taken prior to being tenured. (c) The maximum total payments to be made by the Board shall not exceed $130,000.00. Courses shall be applied for no earlier than the following dates: Summer Session - April 1 Fall/Winter Session - June 1 Spring Session - October 1 Courses must, as set forth hereinabove in this sub-article 18.A.3, be pre-approved by the Superintendent or his designee, prior to the teacher commencing the course(s); and (d) Teacher taking courses shall sign a contract requiring them to reimburse the Board for all tuition paid for a course if the teacher shall voluntarily leave the employ of the Board within one (1) full school/academic year of completion of said course, except that reimbursement shall not be required when the teacher shall voluntarily leave the employ of the Board due to a significant, documented life change. 4. Tuition reimbursement costs shall be a sum not to exceed the actual cost of college credits charged in an accredited public State college/University of the State of New Jersey. B. When the Superintendent initiates in-service training courses, workshops, conferences and programs designed to improve the quality of instruction, the cooperation of the Vineland Education Association will be solicited. Notwithstanding the above, the initiation of in-service training courses, workshops, conferences and programs shall be determined solely at the discretion of the Board. C. One professional leave day may be granted to a teacher upon request, according to the following guidelines: 1. The professional day may be for attendance at a workshop, seminar or visit to another school for the expressed purpose of self professional improvement for the job. 2. The request shall arrive in the office of the Superintendent of Schools at least ten (10) working days prior to the date requested and shall be reviewed by the immediate supervisor prior to submission. The Board reserves the right to deny a professional leave day before or immediately following a holiday or on a day which by its nature suggests a hardship for providing a substitute. 3. No more than two teachers from any one elementary school or from any one department in the secondary schools may be granted a professional leave for a given day. 4. The teacher may be required to submit a report to the Superintendent of Schools, Assistant Superintendent, supervisor (s), principal and staff regarding the activity of the professional day. 5. Costs incurred by the teacher for the professional day authorized under this Section shall be the teacher’s responsibility. 6. A maximum of 90 professional leave days may be authorized for the school year which shall be apportioned as follows: elementary, 35; grades seven and eight, 20; and high school, 35. D. If the Board initiates a teacher’s attendance at a professional workshop, seminar or visit, the expenses shall be the responsibility of the Board. Further, this day shall not be subtracted from the 90 professional leave days granted to teachers of the Association. E. The Board agrees to pay the full cost of courses taken by secretaries related to skills and knowledge improvement when such courses are required and approved by the Board. F. The Board and the Association agree that it is important to communicate when developing and implementing current and future learning technologies, including but not limited to distance and on-line learning.

  • Independent Activities 14.1 Except as expressly provided herein, each party shall have the free and unrestricted right to independently engage in and receive the full benefit of any and all business endeavours of any sort whatsoever, whether or not competitive with the endeavours contemplated herein without consulting the other or inviting or allowing the other to participate therein. No party shall be under any fiduciary or other duty to the other which will prevent it from engaging in or enjoying the benefits of competing endeavours within the general scope of the endeavours contemplated herein. The legal doctrines of "corporate opportunity" sometimes applied to persons engaged in a joint venture or having fiduciary status shall not apply in the case of any party. In particular, without limiting the foregoing, no party shall have any obligation to any other party as to: (a) any opportunity to acquire, explore and develop any mining property, interest or right presently owned by it or offered to it outside of the Property at any time; and (b) the erection of any mining plant, mill, smelter or refinery, whether or not such mining plant, mill, smelter or refinery treats ores or concentrates from the Property.

  • Joint Commercialization Committee As of the Effective Date, the Parties have established a joint commercialization committee (the “Joint Commercialization Committee” or the “JCC”), composed of up to [ * ] representatives of each Party, to monitor and discuss the Commercialization of Products at the operational level. Each JCC representative shall have knowledge and expertise in the commercialization of products similar to Products. The JCC shall in particular: (a) review and recommend the Commercialization Plans and related activities with respect to the Commercialization of Products in the Collaborator Territory, and report to the JEC on all significant Commercialization activities in the Collaborator Territory; (b) provide a forum for and facilitate communications and coordination between the Parties with respect to the Commercialization of Products in the Collaborator Territory and the Exelixis Territory; (c) on an annual basis, discuss and establish Collaborator’s Minimum Commercial Performance thresholds pursuant to Section 6.3(b) and propose recommendation to JEC; [ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (d) review the status of material Product manufacturing and supply activities and strategies associated with Commercialization; (e) review and discuss the major findings of Collaborator’s market research with respect to any Product in the Collaborator Territory, if any; (f) review and oversee the branding and product positioning strategy for Products in the Collaborator Territory and evaluate Collaborator’s brand strategy for the Product in the Collaborator Territory for consistency with the then-current global brand strategy for the Product; (g) discuss Product list price and status of reimbursement in the Collaborator Territory; and (h) perform such other functions as may be appropriate to further the purposes of this Agreement with respect to the Commercialization of Products, including endeavoring to resolve any disputes between the Parties arising from the deliberations of the JCC, or as otherwise directed by the JEC.

  • Professional Development and Training The Company shall pay for or reimburse the Executive for any reasonable professional development or training.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!