Predictors Sample Clauses

Predictors of expected performance (ITT Leading the Task, M01 – M16) INRIA, INESC-ID
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Predictors. (Constant), Due Professional Care, Time Budget Pressure, Dysfunctional Behavior; b. Dependent Variable: Audit Quality Table 3 MODEL SUMMARYb 1 0.951a 0.905 0.902 0.8725
Sample 1
Predictors. (Constant), Due Professional Care, Time Budget Pressure, Dysfunctional Behavior; b.
Sample 1
Predictors. To explore possible predictors of therapy success, baseline scores of the subscales were used in a backward regression analysis in relation to anxiety symptom reduction. This resulted in a significant model [F(2,20)=4,15, p=0.031, R2=.293] consisting of two subscales of the BRIEF, showing that higher baseline scores of shift (β=.381, t=2.02, p=0.057) and organization of materials (β=.347, t=1.84, p=0.081) led to larger reduction of anxiety symptoms, suggesting that subjects who experience many problems with these EF aspects are more likely to benefit from AT. p p p Intercept tests on baseline z-scores showed that some of the EF variables deviated significantly from the mean norm score, but were within normal range (-1 to 1): fluctuation in tempo: [mean(SD)] 0.37 (1,16); F(1,44)=4,61, p=0.037, η 2=.095; accuracy (mistakes) in SSV1: [mean(SD)] 0.63 (1.34); F(1,44)=10,35, p=0.002, η 2=.19; accuracy of inhibition: [mean(SD)] 0,80 (2,26); F(1,44)=5,68, p=0.022, η 2= .114; accuracy of cognitive flexibility: [mean(SD)] 0,68 p (2,12); F(1,44)=4,64, p=0.037, η 2=.095. The variable impulsivity falls within clinical range: [mean(SD)] 1,65 (1,65); F(1,44)=57,07, p p<0.0001, η 2=.52. This indicates a clinical problem (poor inhibition) in this study population. Due to procedural errors, three cases were excluded from analysis, two from the AT group and one from the WL group. The RM-ANOVAs testing the treatment effects of AT on inhibition, cognitive flexibility and sustained attention showed no significant differences between experimental group and control group (0.15<p<0.91). Some of the tasks showed significant outcomes of test moment only, indicating a learning effect. This applied to inhibition (speed), flexibility (speed) and sustained attention (speed and stability), but not for number of errors on the tasks and stability in speed in the inhibition and flexibility tasks. Outcomes of the tasks (mean(SD)) are presented in Table III. Measure and T0 condition Mean (SD) T1 Mean (SD) Time* F Grou p p Effect size (partial η2) BS task Alertness Reaction time AT (n=23) 278 (42) 296 (43) 5,70 .229 .034 WL (n=21) 292 (38) Stability 298 (41) AT (n=23) 81,43 (53,32) 64,26 (33,65) 1.83 .183 .042 WL (n=21) 72,38 (32,04) 86,81 (84,35) AT (n=21) 280 (222) 251 (158) 2,12 .153 .050 WL (n=21)Accuracy (error%) AT (n=21) 358 (295) 10,71 (22,36) 220 (159) 4,29 (6,57) 1,79 .188 .043 WL (n=20) 8,21 (9,97) 9,40 (19,25) AT (n=20) 471 (254) 360 (168) 0,36 .550 .009 WL (n=21) Accuracy (error%)...
Sample 1
Predictors. Performance-based inhibition scores at baseline did correlate to anxiety symptom reduction (r=-.416; p=0.043), indicating that that subjects with poorer inhibition showed a larger reduction of anxiety symptoms, suggesting these subjects are more likely to benefit from AT.
Sample 1
Predictors. Based on previous studies, we a priori selected candidate predictors of post-thrombotic syndrome (14-22). These included sex, age, body mass index, varicose veins at diagnosis, idiopathic deep venous thrombosis, localization of deep venous thrombosis, the extent of residual vein thrombosis quantified with the thrombosis score, and the presence of valvular reflux quantified with the reflux score, and calf muscle pump function and venous outflow resistance. The cumulative incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome was calculated as the number of patients with post-thrombotic syndrome divided by the overall number of patients. The relative risk of each predictor was calculated by risk ratios, with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI). The risk ratios indicate the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome in the presence of a candidate predictor relative to the absence of that predictor. The chi-square test was used to assess differences between proportions. Subsequently, we included all candidate predictors with a P-value ”0.10 in a multivariate logistic regression model. The ability of the model to discriminate between patients with and without post-thrombotic syndrome was estimated by the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. All computations were performed with the use of SPSS software, version 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Patient characteristics of the 111 patients with a first episode of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis are summarized in Table 1. There were 52 women (47%), the mean age of all patients at time of diagnosis was 48 years (5th -95th percentile 27-68) and the overall mean age was 5 years higher in men than in women. Varicose veins, as assessed by the dermatologist, were present at entry in 15 patients (13%). Thrombosis was unilateral on the left side in 55 patients (50%), and none of the patients had bilateral deep venous thrombosis. Distal thrombosis was present in 18 patients (16%), and deep venous thrombosis was idiopathic in 34 patients (31%) (Table 1). A total of 94 patients (85%) completed the two years of follow-up, 11 patients did not complete the follow-up because they were unable to come to the hospital for all examinations, and six patients died of various causes. Recurrent symptomatic deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed in six patients. Two recurrences occurred in the ipsilateral leg and four in the contralateral leg. Median duration to recurrence was 7 months (5th-95th percentile 4-13). Three patients u...
Sample 1
Predictors. Age, gender, health facility1, department, year, age-appropriate DTP vaccination2, education3 and family monthly income (in US dollars) were grouped into demographics. History, signs and symptoms that were analyzed were presence of cough, duration of cough and presence of paroxysmal cough, whoop, posttussive vomit, self-reported fever, vomiting (including posttussive), 1 Presentation to hospital versus ambulatory site, which combined health centers and health posts 2 Age-appropriate dosing per WHO recommendations among children <5 years old defined as dose 1 before age 3 months, dose 2 before age 5 months and dose 3 before age 7 months 3 If patient <18 years of age, answered by patient’s parent/tutor recent use of antibiotics and other respiratory diagnosis upon discharge. Physical findings that were analyzed included measured fever (≥38°C), hypoxia (% oxygen saturation ≤94%) and abnormal breath sounds on exam (crackles/rales, wheezes or rhonchi). Table 4 presents this classification schema. All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software, version 6.3 (Cary, NC). Following Xxxxxxxxx’x variable specification strategy, statistical significance was set at □=0.25, two-tailed, during the selection of predictors to include in the model [18]. For all other analyses, statistical significance was set a priori at □=0.05, two-tailed. We determined the incidence rate of clinical pertussis within our ViCo surveillance population for the time period from June 1, 2008 to July 31, 2011 (43 months or 3.58 years). This was defined as the incidence of new cases of pertussis within our “at risk” population during this given period. Since individual follow- up was unknown for our study population, person-time was calculated by the following: (total population in surveillance project) x (time length of the study period). Therefore, the denominator of our rate included all persons initially surveyed for inclusion into the ViCo surveillance project. The incidence rates were then stratified by age categories (Table 1, Figure 1). This method assumes a stable, dynamic cohort and a small number of new cases.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Predictors

  • Outputs Analogue and digital outputs of protected content are allowed if they meet the requirements in this section and if they are not forbidden elsewhere in this Agreement..

  • Outcomes Secondary: Career pathway students will: have career goals designated on SEOP, earn concurrent college credit while in high school, achieve a state competency certificate and while completing high school graduation requirements.

  • Profitability The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by XXXX under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to XXXX, and pre-tax profits realized by XXXX, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board and the Fee Consultant reviewed XXXX’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by XXXX in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed certain publicly available information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that, while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates’ overall profitability with respect to the DWS Funds (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by XXXX and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of most comparable firms for which such data was available. Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Expectations Faculty members participating in the annuitant employment program are expected to perform the full range of faculty duties, on a pro rata basis. They are subject to the professional development plans required under Article 22.

  • Dependability a) Requires constant supervision to perform daily routine correctly b) Occasionally misses necessary task c) Rarely misses necessary task and is reliable d) Outstanding reliability and job is always completed correctly

  • Capabilities A. The Parties agree that the DRE must possess the legal, technical, and financial capacity to: (1) Accept and expend non-federal funds consistent with Section 4.2.4; (2) Accept transfer of the FERC license and title for the Facilities from PacifiCorp; (3) Seek and obtain necessary permits and other authorizations to implement Facilities Removal; (4) Enter into appropriate contracts and grant agreements for effectuating Facilities Removal; (5) Perform, directly or by oversight, Facilities Removal; (6) Prevent, mitigate, and respond to damages the DRE or any of its contractors, subcontractors, or assigns cause during the course of Facilities Removal, and, consistent with Applicable Law, respond to and defend associated liability claims against the DRE or any of its contractors, subcontractors, or assigns, including costs thereof and any judgments or awards resulting therefrom; (7) Carry the required insurance and bonding set forth in Appendix L to respond to liability and damages claims associated with Facilities Removal against the DRE or any of its contractors, subcontractors, or assigns; (8) Meet the deadlines set forth in Exhibit 4; and (9) Perform such other tasks as are reasonable and necessary for Facilities Removal. B. Before the DRE and PacifiCorp file the joint application to transfer the license for the Facilities, the DRE will Timely demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the States and PacifiCorp that it possesses the legal, technical, and financial capacity to accomplish the tasks in Sections 7.1.2.A(1) through (5), (8), and (9). PacifiCorp and the States will consult if the DRE fails to make the demonstration required in this subsection. C. Within six months of the DRE’s execution of the Settlement, the DRE will include in an informational filing in the FERC license transfer proceeding proof that it possesses the legal, technical, and financial capacity to accomplish the tasks in Sections 7.1.2.A(6) and (7). This filing will include documentation that the DRE meets the requirements of Parts II, III, and IV of Appendix L and is capable of fulfilling its obligations under Section 7.1.3. The DRE will not provide the filing if either of the States or PacifiCorp objects to the filing after a reasonable opportunity to review before submission to FERC. The six-month deadline may be changed by agreement of the DRE, the States, and PacifiCorp. The Parties will Meet and Confer if the DRE fails to provide the informational filing to FERC.

  • Indicators Debt to Asset Ratio (10%) •Cash Flow (10%) •Total Margin (25%)

  • Reliability Reliability targets (Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)) are defined in the technical specifications as set out in the Contract. Notwithstanding any possible application of penalties relating to reliability defined in the Contract, Goods shall remain covered by the warranty defined in this Article 16 as long as the reliability commitments have not been reached.

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!