Professional Growth Plans and Professional Improvement Plans. Based upon the results of the annual teacher evaluation, each teacher must develop either a professional growth plan or professional improvement plan as follows:
Professional Growth Plans and Professional Improvement Plans. Based upon the results of the annual evaluations, each school counselor must develop either a professional growth plan or professional improvement plan as follows:
a. Counselors whose final summative rating is “Accomplished” shall develop a professional growth plan and may choose their credentialed evaluator for the next evaluation cycle from those available in their specific building, provided the evaluators in the specific building have a balanced evaluation schedule (if not, the counselor will select based upon seniority). If the Superintendent determines to assign a second evaluator for a given school year, pursuant to 3.b. above, the Superintendent will select the additional evaluator. The counselor, however, may provide input as to who the second evaluator may be.
b. Counselors whose final summative rating is “Skilled” or Developing” shall develop a professional growth plan collaboratively with his/her credentialed evaluator and will have input on his/her evaluator(s) for the next evaluation cycle.
c. Counselors whose final summative rating is “Ineffective” shall develop a professional improvement plan with their credentialed evaluator(s). The Superintendent will assign the evaluator(s) for the subsequent evaluation cycle and approve the professional improvement plan. Additionally, a counselor who receives a rating of “Ineffective” on his/her metric of student outcomes or observation performance portion of the cumulative evaluation may choose by May 1 to develop a professional improvement plan. A counselor who elects to develop a professional improvement plan will have input on his/her evaluator(s) for the next evaluation cycle.
d. The credentialed evaluator may recommend a school counselor be placed on an improvement plan following the receipt of a rating of “Ineffective” on the classroom performance component of the evaluation.
e. Counselors on resident educator licenses who have a mentor teacher assigned may request the mentor participate in the development of an Improvement Plan; however, the mentor teacher shall not have a formal evaluative role.
f. The evaluator(s), together with the teacher, will formulate the improvement plan. The improvement plan will outline the following:
i. Specific performance expectations, resources and the assistance to be provided.
ii. Reasonable timelines for its completion, but it must be completed by April 15 of the following year.
iii. Professional indicators documented as ineffective through the formal evaluation...
Professional Growth Plans and Professional Improvement Plans. There will be three categories of Growth or Improvement plans:
Professional Growth Plans and Professional Improvement Plans. Based upon the results of the annual evaluations conducted in accordance with this policy, each school counselor must develop either a professional growth plan or professional improvement plan as follows:
Professional Growth Plans and Professional Improvement Plans. Based upon the results of the annual teacher evaluation, each teacher must develop either a professional growth plan or professional improvement plan as set forth in the Ohio Department of Education’s framework and guidance.
Professional Growth Plans and Professional Improvement Plans. Each teacher must develop either a professional growth plan or professional improvement plan as follows:
a) Teachers whose performance rating indicates above expected levels of student growth will develop a professional growth plan and may choose their credentialed evaluator from those available to the Board for that purpose, utilizing the components set forth in the "Teacher Evaluation Form."
b) Teachers whose performance rating indicates expected levels of student growth will develop a professional growth plan collaboratively with his/her credentialed evaluator and will have input on his/her evaluator for the next evaluation cycle, utilizing the components set forth in the "Teacher Evaluation Form."
c) Teachers whose performance rating indicates below expected levels of student growth will develop a professional improvement plan with their credentialed evaluator. The administration will assign the evaluator for the subsequent evaluation cycle and approve the professional improvement plan, utilizing the components set forth in "Teacher Evaluation Form."
Professional Growth Plans and Professional Improvement Plans. Based upon the results of the annual teacher evaluation as converted to the “Evaluation Matrix” above, each teacher must develop either a professional growth plan or professional improvement plan as follows:
a. Teachers with above expected levels of student growth shall develop a professional growth plan and may choose their evaluator for the subsequent evaluation cycle.
b. Teachers with expected levels of student growth shall develop a professional growth plan and shall have input into who their evaluator will be for the subsequent evaluation cycle.
c. Teachers with below expected levels of student growth must comply with an improvement plan developed by their evaluator in consultation with the teacher and the administration will assign the evaluator for the subsequent evaluation cycle.
d. Improvement plans detail specific performance expectations, resources and assistance to be provided, sufficient time for completion and allocation of District financial resources.
Professional Growth Plans and Professional Improvement Plans. Based upon the results of the annual teacher evaluation as converted to the "Evaluation Matrix" above, each teacher must develop either a professional growth plan or professional improvement plan as follows:
A. Teachers whose performance rating indicates above expected levels of student growth develop a professional growth plan and may choose their credentialed evaluator from those available to the Board for that purpose, utilizing the components set forth in the "Teacher Evaluation Form."
B. Teachers whose performance rating indicates expected levels of student growth will develop a professional growth plan collaboratively with the Professional Development Committee.
C. Teachers whose performance rating indicates below expected levels of student growth will develop a professional improvement plan with their credentialed evaluator. The administration will assign the evaluator for the subsequent evaluation cycle and approve the professional improvement plan.
Professional Growth Plans and Professional Improvement Plans. Based upon the results of the evaluation conducted in accordance with this Section, each school counselor must develop either a professional growth plan or professional improvement plan as follows:
1. School counselors with a final summative rating of “Accomplished” will develop a professional growth plan.
2. School counselors with a final summative rating of “Skilled” or “Developing,” and those counselors new to the District will develop a professional growth plan in collaboration with their evaluator.
3. School counselors with a final summative rating of “Ineffective” will develop an improvement plan directed by their evaluator.
4. A school counselor may be placed on an improvement plan based on deficiencies in any individual component of the evaluation system.
Professional Growth Plans and Professional Improvement Plans. Based upon the results of the annual teacher evaluation:
a. Teachers whose student growth rating indicates above expected levels of student growth may develop a professional growth plan and they may choose their credentialed evaluator from those available to the Board for that purpose.
b. Teachers whose student growth rating indicates expected levels of student growth will develop a professional growth plan collaboratively with his/her credentialed evaluator and will have input on his/her evaluator for the next evaluation cycle.
c. Teachers whose student growth rating indicates below expected levels of student growth will develop a professional improvement plan with their credentialed evaluator. The administration will assign the evaluator for the subsequent evaluation cycle and approve the professional improvement plan.
