PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT. All packages need to be clearly labeled and sealed in the manner described in Part II – General Information, Paragraph C. Each copy of the proposal must be prepared as one (1) document. Bidders have been provided with a checklist to assist in proposal preparation (refer to Part VIII – Forms); however, Bidders are ultimately responsible for fulfilling the submittal requirements as outlined in this IFB. Each page is to be numbered at the bottom, starting with the number 1; all pages should be 8½ x 11 inch paper (except for blue print); and all narrative portions of the proposal should be typed.
PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT. The County discourages overly lengthy and costly proposals, however, in order for the County to evaluate proposals fairly and completely, proposers should follow the format set out herein and provide all of the information requested.
PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT. The Proposer(s) are required to prepare their written proposals in accordance with the instructions outlined below. Deviations from these instructions may be construed as non-responsive and may be cause for disqualification. Emphasis should be placed on accuracy, completeness, and clarity of content. The format and content of the Proposal are as follows:
PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT. L1.5.1 Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.
PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT. 4.1 Proposal Information and Criteria 4.2 Signed Authentication of Proposal and Statements of Non-Collusion and Non- Conflict of Interest Form 4.3 Transmittal Letter 4.4 Executive Summary and Proposal Overview 4.5 Criteria
PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT. 4.1 Proposal Information and Criteria In addition to the previously stated requirements above, the following list specifies the items to be addressed in the proposal. Proposers should read it carefully and address it completely and in the order listed to facilitate the University’s review of the proposal. Submittal Requirements: • Signed Authentication of Proposal and Statement of Non-Collusion and Non-Conflict of Interest Form. • Transmittal Letter • Executive Summary and Proposal Overview • Criteria response
PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT. Attachment A: The Proposal Form that is ATTACHMENT A follows the evaluative format set forth below. Developers must use ATTACHMENT A (which they may put on their own word processing system) in submitting their Proposals. The following provisions of this Section are intended to provide Developers with useful information as to how each category might best be answered. Developers should note that the category headings in the left column of ATTACHMENT A are abbreviated compared to the information requested below; the headings in ATTACHMENT A are informational only, for guidance, and all of the information requested below should be included in the corresponding places in ATTACHMENT A.
PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT. Proposals should be typed as brief as possible. They should not include any elaborate or unnecessary promotional material. The following order and content of proposal sections should be adhered to by each vendor.
PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT. The proposal shall be (1) clear and concise, (2) responsive to all RFP requirements, and (3) presented in the form of a written report separated by tabs into the following subheadings:
PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT. The City has established three categories of requirements for proposals submitted: Part 1 – Proponent Declaration Part 2 – Planning Framework Summary Part 3 – Design Brief Each proposal should include all of the categories of requirements listed under each part below. The review team will review all proposals based on the criteria set out in this EOI in addition to any other criteria the City deems appropriate. The review may consider criteria not set out herein at the City’s unencumbered discretion. The City shall not consider proposals received from parties with whom the City is in litigation, or arbitration, including matters commenced by the party before administrative tribunals such as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) and Assessment Review Board, unless approval allowing such consideration is obtained by the proponent from the Council of the City.
