Quarterly Site Status Sample Clauses

Quarterly Site Status. In summary, the activities and observations for this quarter consist of the following: • The Groundwater Remedy Optimization (GRO) system operated as planned during this quarter (maintenance was performed on the system that necessitated shutting the system down for brief periods during the reporting period) and pumped approximately 462,000 gallons of water from the AOA • The previous period’s Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) quarterly report was sent to EPA and UDEQ in July 2022 • A Sixth Five-Year Review Report for Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) Site, San Juan County, Monticello, Utah (DOE 2022b) was submitted to the EPA and UDEQ in July • Weekly site inspections were performed by site personnel to verify the integrity of the site’s systems and monitor activities that might occur in supplemental standards properties (e.g., City of Monticello streets and utility corridors) • Site personnel performed monthly and quarterly site inspections in accordance with the LTS&M Plan • Routine surveillance did not note any anomalous conditions for the MVP remedy • Routine surveillance did not note any violations of MMTS institutional controls (IC’s) that restrict land and groundwater use • Routine surveillance did not note any anomalous conditions for the surface features of the disposal cell and Pond 4, the engineered solar evaporation pond • Routine surveillance noted no operational deficiencies for the Temporary Storage Facility (TSF) • LM and Legacy Management Support (LMS) personnel conducted a Facilities Information Management System property asset walkthrough on July 14, 2022 • The Million Gallon Sampling event was conducted on August 2, 2022 • LMS contractor performed the annual site inspection the week of September 5, 2022 • LM hosted a tour at the Monticello National Priorities List (NPL) sites by the International Atomic Energy Association on September 1, 2022
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quarterly Site Status. An unplanned shutdown of the groundwater remedy optimization system occurred on December 1, 2015, due to a failed check valve in the groundwater transfer building. Design improvements and repairs were completed and phased system startup began on March 2, 2016. The treatment system resumed full-time, continuous operation on March 9, 2016. • As an atypical monitoring event, groundwater samples were collected in February and March 2016 from the AOA to assess uranium concentration rebounding during and after the unplanned shutdown of the groundwater remedy optimization system. • Xxxxxxx surveillance noted no anomalous conditions for the MVP remedy. • Routine surveillance noted no violations of MMTS ICs regarding land- and groundwater- use restrictions. • Routine surveillance noted no anomalous conditions for the surface features of the disposal cell and Pond 4.‌‌‌ • Routine surveillance noted no operating deficiencies for the temporary storage facility (TSF).
Quarterly Site Status. A summary of the activities and observations for this quarter is as follows: • The Groundwater Remedy Optimization (GRO) system operated as planned during the current period. • Laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected for the geochemical characterization in November 2018 were completed in March 2019. Data collected from the analyses will be used to determine the distribution of solid phase concentrations, which borehole soils will be used in the column tests, and which xxxxx’ water will be collected to U.S. Department of Energy Monticello NPL Sites FFA Quarterly Report: January 1–March 31, 2019 May 2019 Doc. No. S25044 help with the column tests. Additionally, the analytical results of the soil samples will be used in the ongoing development of the groundwater fate and transport model.‌ • Xxxxxxx surveillance noted no anomalous conditions for the MVP remedy. • Routine surveillance noted no violations of MMTS ICs regarding land- and groundwater-use restrictions. • Routine surveillance noted no anomalous conditions for the surface features of the disposal cell and Pond 4. • The volume of water pumped from the Pond 4 Leachate Collection and Removal System (LCRS) continued to exceed the action level for this quarter. LM has previously notified EPA and UDEQ of this Pond 4 action level exceedance. • Routine surveillance noted no operating deficiencies for the Temporary Storage Facility (TSF). • Accumulation of snow from winter storms left the site covered for all of this quarter. Accumulation of approximately 3 feet was common in the area and on the site.
Quarterly Site Status. Operation of the OU III contingency groundwater remedy optimization system began during this quarter. As described in Section 3.3.3, approximately 2 million gallons of groundwater was pumped from the alluvial aquifer in the Area of Attainment (AOA) and transmitted to Pond 4 for evaporative treatment. • Xxxxxxx surveillance noted no anomalous conditions for the MVP remedy. • Routine surveillance noted no anomalous conditions for the MMTS remedy. • Routine surveillance noted no anomalous conditions for the surface features of the disposal cell and Pond 4. • Routine surveillance noted no anomalous operating conditions for the repository Leachate Collection and Removal Systems (LCRS). • Operation of the OU III groundwater contingency remedy optimization system has resulted in increased water collection in the Pond 4 LCRS. The LCRS recirculation system is operating as intended and the action level leakage rate, as described in Section 3.4 of the LTS&M Plan, has not been exceeded. • Routine surveillance noted no anomalous operating conditions for the repository and Pond 4 Leak Detection Systems (LDS).
Quarterly Site Status. In summary, the activities and observations for this quarter consist of the following: • The Groundwater Remedy Optimization (GRO) system operated from January 1 to March 31 this quarter. The system pumped approximately 608,000 gallons of water from the AOA. • The previous period’s Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) quarterly report was sent to EPA and UDEQ in February 2024. • Weekly site inspections were performed by site personnel to verify the integrity of the site’s systems and monitor activities that might occur in supplemental standards properties (e.g., City of Monticello streets and utility corridors). • Site personnel performed monthly and quarterly site inspections in accordance with the LTS&M Plan. • Routine surveillance did not note any anomalous conditions for the MVP remedy. • Routine surveillance did not note any violations of MMTS ICs that restrict land and groundwater use. • Routine surveillance did not note any anomalous conditions for the surface features of the disposal cell and Pond 4, the engineered solar evaporation pond. • Routine surveillance noted no operational deficiencies for the Temporary Storage Facility (TSF).

Related to Quarterly Site Status

  • Examination of work before covering up In respect of the work which the Authority’s Engineer is entitled to examine, inspect, measure and/or test before it is covered up or put out of view or any part of the work is placed thereon, the Contractor shall give notice to the Authority’s Engineer whenever any such work is ready and before it is covered up. The Authority’s Engineer shall then either carry out the examination, inspection or testing without unreasonable delay, or promptly give notice to the Contractor that the Authority’s Engineer does not require to do so. Provided, however, that if any work is of a continuous nature where it is not possible or prudent to keep it uncovered or incomplete, the Contractor shall notify the schedule of carrying out such work to give sufficient opportunity, not being less than 3 (three) business days’ notice, to the Authority’s Engineer to conduct its inspection, measurement or test while the work is continuing. Provided further that in the event the Contractor receives no response from the Authority’s Engineer within a period of 3 (three) business days from the date on which the Contractor’s notice hereunder is delivered to the Authority’s Engineer, the Contractor shall be entitled to assume that the Authority’s Engineer would not undertake the said inspection.

  • No Release; Return or Destruction Each Party agrees not to release or disclose, or permit to be released or disclosed, any information addressed in Section 6.9(a) to any other Person, except its Representatives who need to know such information in their capacities as such (who shall be advised of their obligations hereunder with respect to such information), and except in compliance with Section 6.10. Without limiting the foregoing, when any such information is no longer needed for the purposes contemplated by this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement, and is no longer subject to any legal hold or other document preservation obligation, each Party will promptly after request of the other Party either return to the other Party all such information in a tangible form (including all copies thereof and all notes, extracts or summaries based thereon) or notify the other Party in writing that it has destroyed such information (and such copies thereof and such notes, extracts or summaries based thereon); provided, that the Parties may retain electronic back-up versions of such information maintained on routine computer system backup tapes, disks or other backup storage devices; provided further, that any such information so retained shall remain subject to the confidentiality provisions of this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement.

  • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT 3.1 The Supplier shall adopt a policy of continuous improvement in relation to the Services pursuant to which it will regularly review with the Authority the Services and the manner in which it is providing the Services with a view to reducing the Authority's costs (including the Framework Prices), the costs of Contracting Bodies and/or improving the quality and efficiency of the Services. The Supplier and the Authority will provide to each other any information which may be relevant to assisting the objectives of continuous improvement and in particular reducing costs.

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.

  • Completion of Probationary Period An employee who has completed the probationary period may be suspended without pay or discharged only for cause. An employee who has completed the probationary period and is suspended without pay or discharged shall have access to the grievance procedure.

  • Substantial Completion Date Substantial Completion of the Work as defined in Article 6.1.2 of the General Conditions to the Continuing Contract for Construction Management shall be achieved by July 31, 2022.

  • Performance Testing 7.2.1 The Design-Builder shall direct and supervise the tests and, if necessary, the retests of the Plant using Design-Builder’s supervisory personnel and the Air Emissions Tester shall conduct the air emissions test, in each case, in accordance with the testing procedures set forth in Exhibit A (the “Performance Tests”), to demonstrate, at a minimum, compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria. Owner is responsible for obtaining Air Emissions Tester and for ensuring Air Emissions Tester’s timely performance. Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Air Emissions Tester to facilitate performance of all air emissions tests. Design-Builder shall not be held responsible for the actions of Owner’s employees and third parties involved in the Performance Testing, including but not limited to Air Emissions Tester. 7.2.2 No later than thirty (30) Days prior to the earlier of the Scheduled Substantial Completion Date or Substantial Completion, Design-Builder shall provide to Owner for review a detailed testing plan for the Performance Tests (other than for air emissions). Owner and Design-Builder shall agree upon a testing plan that shall be consistent with the Performance Test Protocol contained in Exhibit A hereto. After such agreement has been reached, Design-Builder shall notify the Owner five (5) business days prior to the date Design-Builder intends to commence the Performance Tests and shall notify the Owner upon commencement of the Performance Tests. Owner and Independent Engineer each have the right to witness all testing, including the Performance Tests and any equipment testing, whether at the Site or at the Subcontractor’s or equipment supplier’s premises during the course of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, Owner shall bear the costs of providing a witness to any such testing and all such witnesses shall comply at all times with Design-Builder’s, Subcontractor’s or equipment supplier’s safety and security procedures and other reasonable requirements, and otherwise conduct themselves in a manner that does not interfere with Design-Builder’s, Subcontractor’s or equipment supplier’s activities or operations. 7.2.3 Design-Builder shall provide to Owner a Performance Test report (excluding results from air emissions testing), including all applicable test data, calculations and certificates indicating the results of the Performance Tests and, within five (5) business days of Owner’s receipt of such results, Owner, Independent Engineer and Design-Builder will jointly inspect such Work and review the results of the Performance Tests to verify that the Performance Guarantee Criteria have been met. If Owner or Independent Engineer reasonably determines that the Performance Guarantee Criteria have not been met, Owner shall notify Design-Builder the reasons why Owner determined that the Performance Guarantee Criteria have not been met and Design-Builder shall promptly take such action or perform such additional work as will achieve the Performance Guarantee Criteria and shall issue to the Owner another notice in accordance with Section 7.2.2; provided however that if the notice relates to a retest, the notice may be provided no less than two (2) business days prior to the Performance Tests. Such procedure shall be repeated as necessary until Owner and Independent Engineer verifies that the Performance Guarantee Criteria have been met. 7.2.4 If Owner, for whatever reason, prevents Design-Builder from demonstrating the Performance Guarantee Criteria within thirty (30) Days of Design-Builder’s notice that the Plant is ready for Performance Testing, then Design-Builder shall be excused from demonstrating compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria during such period of time that Design-Builder is prevented from demonstrating compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria; provided however that Design-Builder will be deemed to have fulfilled all of its obligations to demonstrate that the Plant meets the Performance Guarantee Criteria should such period of time during which Design-Builder is prevented from demonstrating the Performance Criteria exceed thirty (30) Days or extend beyond the Final Completion Date.

  • Modified Work/Return to Work Programs The Employer and the Union recognize the purpose of modified work/return to work programs, is to provide fair and consistent practices for accommodating nurses who have been ill, injured or permanently disabled, to enable their safe return to work. The parties undertake to provide safe and meaningful employment for all nurses based on the following objectives and principles:

  • Completion of Services (a) The Customer must: (i) notify Deswik in writing as soon as the Customer becomes aware of any defects in the Services; or (ii) provide Deswik with an email confirming successful completion of any Services Deswik advises the Customer have been completed. (b) If the Customer does not notify Deswik of any defects under clause 5.4(a)(i) or provide Deswik with an email confirming successful completion of the Services within 14 days of Deswik notifying the Customer that the relevant Services are complete, the Customer is deemed to have accepted the Services. (c) If the Customer notifies Deswik of any defects under clause 5.4(a)(i), Deswik will, as soon as possible investigate and (where applicable) undertake rectification of the defects. Upon completion of any defect rectification the Customer must promptly provide an email notification of the successful completion of the services, unless further defects exist. In this case, the Customer is further required to notify Deswik of such defects.

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority 3.2 The Authority may from time to time make changes to the KPIs measured as set out in paragraph 3.1 above and shall issue a replacement version to the Supplier. The Authority shall give notice In Writing of any such change to the KPIs measured and shall specify the date from which the replacement KPIs must be used for future reports. Such date shall be at least thirty (30) calendar days following the date of the notice to the Supplier.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!