Scenario 2. If in the future the sweepings are no longer stored in bays at depots but instead are tipped at SCC managed Transfer Stations, the handling costs will not be incurred by the relevant WCA and handling costs will be incurred by SCC, so the handling payment of £2.76 per tonne will cease. Any saving relating to a reduction from the starting gate fee of £52 per tonne would still be shared on a 50:50 basis.
Scenario 2. If you have a balance of £100, and the minimum payment we ask you for in your statement is £20, and there is a refund to your account of £90 between your statement date and your payment due date, (or your Direct Debit date, if earlier), then we will reduce the minimum payment needed so that it equals the full remaining balance of £10.
Scenario 2 railway APT declared by a Digital Service Provider
Scenario 2. In the event the Net Settlement Fund is less than the total of the Amounts Allegedly Withheld for all Claimants submitting Valid Claims, but greater than the amount needed to pay each Claimant submitting a Valid Claim his or her Adjusted Amount (specified below), Claimants submitting a Valid Claim will receive Settlement Payments of their Adjusted Amount. The “Adjusted Amount” for each Claimant, based on the Claimant’s “Payment Group” will be defined as follows:
Scenario 2. PTC exploits the Programme Intellectual Property on a For-Profit Basis through outlicensing of a Product to a Third Party on a worldwide, exclusive basis prior to Regulatory Approval.
a) The parties shall hold an economic stake (“Base Shares”) in the Product calculated as of outlicensing effective date based on their respective economic contributions.
i) On the Commencement Date, PTC begins with $5.4 million Base Shares, and the Trust with zero.
ii) As the Trust pays the proposed the proposed $5.4 million US funding amount over the Programme Term, the Trust’s Base Share shall increase proportionately. By way of example, [**].
iii) Following the Programme Term, PTC’s ownership of Base Shares shall increase proportionately based on PTC’s continuing economic contribution. By way of example, [**].
b) All consideration attributable to outlicensing to a Third Party (other than debt at arm’s length interest rates or bona fide research funding) shall be divided between PTC and the Trust according to relative Base Share ownership at the time of such outlicensing. By way of example, [**].
c) For clarity, once outlicensing under this scenario has occurred, then the milestones provided for in scenario 1 shall no longer apply following the effective date of the outlicense; provided, that if a milestone trigger event occurred prior to the outlicense but installment payments are ongoing, PTC must complete such milestone payments.
d) For clarity, neither PTC nor the Third Party gaining the outlicense shall make any royalty payments to the Trust under this scenario.
e) License or access payments to Third Parties for enabling technologies required, in the good faith judgment of PTC, to develop and commercialize a Product shall be counted in the calculation of Base Shares under this scenario; provided, however, that such payments shall not include license or access payments made with respect to the composition of matter or method of use of those active ingredient(s) in the Product that incorporate, comprise or are derived from the Programme Intellectual Property.
Scenario 2. The Student Plays a Game As the teacher sets up a lesson plan for the students and authorizes it, the students will be able to access a game with their identification credentials. Figure 4 shows that after logging in, when the student accesses the game from the BEACONING ecosystem, the game loads and the student plays it and learns through the process. The teacher has the option to customize the games
1. Initiates customized games BEACONING Ecosystem Student
2. Game w/personal elements
3. Gameplay data
Scenario 2. Accenture Generated Proposal leveraging Xxxxxxx or Answerthink Services. Accenture intends to identify clients who Accenture believes could benefit from Xxxxxxx Benchmarking Services or from utilizing other intellectual property of Answerthink or Xxxxxxx. In such an instance, Accenture will create a Client Opportunity Registration Form and refer the client to Answerthink. Answerthink shall indicate on each Client Opportunity Registration Form whether it accepts or rejects each proposed client and shall provide a copy of such Form to Accenture which shall serve as notice as to whether a client is accepted or rejected. In the event Xxxxxxx provides Xxxxxxx Benchmarking Services for such a client, Accenture and Answerthink will jointly review the Benchmarking Services results and develop a proposal setting forth solution alternatives the client may choose to pursue based on such results. Accenture will estimate the pricing of the proposed initiatives and act as the primary contractor to the client on any proposals submitted or engagements generated in this Section 2.2.2. For each engagement obtained through this scenario and for related follow-on services for the time periods covered in Section 2.5, Answerthink shall have the right and option to staff a number of positions equal to up to 15% of the total project positions described in Section 2.4 for which Alliance Services are to be rendered (in calculating total project positions, analyst positions, and other positions for which Answerthink does not have staffing capability, will be included); provided, however, Answerthink will be awarded only such positions for which it has available qualified personnel at the rates provided for in this Agreement. If Answerthink chooses to participate, the Answerthink professionals will be charged to Accenture at prices set forth on the rate card referred to in Section 2.3 hereof with further marketing discounts described in Section 2.3. As the primary contractor to the client, Accenture will have the right to make all final decisions regarding the skill levels required to support the client team.
Scenario 2. Different population, similar or same data source
Scenario 2. If the Transferring Customer transfers to a RES that is not an Affiliate of the Seller and not an Affiliate of any of the Buyer’s power suppliers, Buyer shall be entitled to RCOA reduction provided that: a. The Transferring Customer was an existing captive customer of the Buyer prior to COD; b. The average monthly demand of the Transferring Customer for the 12 months immediately preceding the switching date c. Buyer’s RCOA Reduction quantity shall be computed using the following formula: Formula: 𝐵𝑀𝑊 𝐴𝑀𝑊 = [ ] ∗ [𝐸𝑀𝑊] ∑ 𝐶𝑀𝑊 + 𝐷𝑊𝐸𝑆𝑀𝑀𝑊 𝐴𝑀𝑊 – Seller Carve-Out (in MW) which is equivalent to the reduction of Contracted Capacity due to switching of Contestable Customer (yearly basis from interval 0001H-2400H) ��𝑀𝑊 – Contract Capacity (in MW) prior to the reduction date ∑ 𝐶𝑀𝑊 – Current Aggregated Capacity (in MW) of suppliers contracted by Buyer, immediately prior to the reduction date 𝐷𝑊𝐸𝑆𝑀𝑀𝑊– Annual Average Exposure (Purchases, in MW) of Buyer to the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market, immediately prior to the reduction date 𝐸𝑀𝑊 – Capacity for Switching (in MW), equivalent to the Average Demand of contestable customers for the 12 months immediately preceding the reduction date. The Contract Capacity and Associated Energy shall be reduced equivalent to the reduction in the demand of affected ECs by reason of the implementation of Retail Competition and Open Access, the Renewable Energy Law, orother relevant Laws and Legal Requirements.
Scenario 2. Scenario 2 describes 2.5 km x 2.5 km region of Kurfürstendamm in Berlin which is typical area around city centre where business area, shopping street and residential area are equally combined. Thus, the high volume of data traffic is estimated in this region. The density of MCS in this region refers the middle of Berlin scenarios, namely ~4.16 MCSs/km2 . Accordingly, 120 SCSs are considered to be deployed in this scenario resulting in relative high density of ~20 SCSs/km2. Locations of MCS, MFC and SCS are shown in Fig. 8. In addition, a part of this scenario is shown as 3D in Fig. 9. The grey blocks represent buildings, red points represent MCS, blue points represent SCS and green crosses represent MFC. The designed MCS are positioned at around 32 m high in average with ~8 m standard deviation. As mentioned in section 6.2, 50 % of SCSs (i.e. 60 SCSs in this case) are positioned at a height of 4m (street level deployment), while the rest are positioned 1m above the rooftop of the buildings. In summary, SCs are positioned at average height of 14.6 m with 11.3 m deviation. This scenario provides realistic simulation environments for surrounding area of centrum in megacity where traffic demands and population density are relative high.
