We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

SITE BASED DECISION Sample Clauses

SITE BASED DECISION. 32.01 Site Based Decision (SBD) is the process by which the teachers at the work site jointly make decisions affecting their working conditions. Decisions made by SBD Committee will not violate the Agreement. Decisions made by the SBD Committee will be approved by the Association and Board prior to implementation of the decisions. 32.02 SBD Committee is an ad hoc committee. The REA Building Representative or the Principal may request the formation of the ad hoc committee for a specific purpose. The purpose will be made known to the Association President and the appropriate Assistant Superintendent for Instruction. If the Association and the Assistant Superintendent for Instruction agree the purpose is appropriate for SBD, the committee will be formed. If the Association or Assistant Superintendent for Instruction does not agree the purpose is appropriate for SBD, no committee will be formed. The Association and Assistant Superintendent for Instruction will attempt to resolve the purpose for which the SBD was requested. 32.03 When the SBD Committee has completed its project, the committee will be disbanded. If, in the judgment of the Association or Assistant Superintendent for Instruction, the SBD Committee is unable to complete its project in a reasonable period of time, either the Association or Assistant Superintendent for Instruction may offer assistance to the committee or disband it. 32.04 Participation on a SBD Committee is voluntary and will not be a part of a teacher's evaluation, personnel file, or otherwise be used to discipline or reward the teacher. 32.05 Decisions of SBD Committee must be approved by 70% of the teachers that will be affected by the decision. Any decision of the committee will be terminated by forty-five percent (45%) of the teachers that are being affected. All decisions of the committee will be for a specific duration not to exceed two (2) school years or a portion thereof. Extensions beyond two school years must be approved by the Association, the appropriate Assistant Superintendent for Instruction, and seventy percent (70%) of the teachers affected by the extension. 32.06 SBD Committee will be composed of only employees of the Board. Non- employee consultants may be used with the consent of the committee members. Committee decisions will be by consensus. The chairperson of the committee will be selected by the committee. 32.07 SBD Committee decisions that require a deviation from the Agreement will be permitted only after ...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
SITE BASED DECISION. Making Committees - Both Parties to this Agreement endorse site based decision-making and/or participatory management at the school level. The Parties jointly encourage parent involvement and minority representation on all decision making committees. There shall be no reprisals for professional participation.
Sample 1Sample 2
SITE BASED DECISION. MAKING SHARED DECISION MAKING Decisions, which directly impact the learner, are often best made at the school level where the needs of the learner are best known. A shared decision-making model that involves employees will build trust, will result in higher quality decisions, will ensure ownership of decisions, and will create a base of support for school initiatives. In the event a site-based decision-making team decision requires a waiver of any school board policy, district/building administrative program, or state rule or regulation, the administration will review the waiver as needed. In the event a decision by the team contains a provision that is contrary to a collective bargaining agreement, such provision shall be submitted to the district and the union for consideration of a mutually satisfactory accommodation for a specific period. In the event that a decision impacts a support department, the team will seek an accommodation of the impact with the appropriate support department administrator and staff. Site-based teams may include all interested employees. Decisions, which directly impact the learner, are often best made at the school level where the needs of the learner are best known. A shared decision-making model that involves all employees will build trust, will result in higher quality decisions, will ensure ownership of decisions, and will create a base of support for initiatives. Building Leadership Teams should strive to incorporate diverse ideas, viewpoints, and backgrounds, while making decisions that reflect the values and needs of the community. Building Leadership Team positions will be posted annually through a building-level application process. Building Leadership Team meetings shall be open to all interested employees. Agendas will be distributed to staff at least 24 hours before the meeting and minutes will be distributed within 48 hours after the meeting. Decisions by Building Leadership Teams shall be supported with the consensus of the entire building staff.
Sample 1
SITE BASED DECISION. MAKING‌‌ In the event a site-based decision-making team decision requires a waiver of any school board policy, district/building administrative program, or state rule or regulation, the administration will review the waiver as needed. In the event a decision by the team contains a provision that is contrary to a collective bargaining agreement, such provision shall be submitted to the district and the union for consideration of a mutually satisfactory accommodation for a specific period. In the event that a decision impacts a support department, the team will seek an accommodation of the impact with the appropriate support department administrator and staff. Site-based teams may include all interested employees. This following Article 18 is contingent on full levy funding.‌
Sample 1

Related to SITE BASED DECISION

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs. B. Participation on the SAC shall not serve as a basis for the evaluation of any teacher. C. A minimum of three (3) to a maximum of five (5) teachers from each school shall serve on their school’s budget advisory committee formed for the purpose of making recommendations on the school’s general fund budget. Teacher members shall be elected by the faculty. Minutes from such meetings may be requested by the faculty and may be posted on the CTA bulletin board at the school by the Association Representative.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

  • Value-Based Programs If you receive covered healthcare services under a Value-Based Program inside a Host Blue’s service area, you will not be responsible for paying any of the Provider Incentives, risk-sharing, and/or Care Coordinator Fees that are a part of such an arrangement, except when a Host Blue passes these fees to us through average pricing or fee schedule adjustments. The following defined terms only apply to the BlueCard section only: • Care Coordinator Fee is a fixed amount paid by us to providers periodically for Care Coordination under a Value-Based Program. • Care Coordination is organized, information-driven patient care activities intended to facilitate the appropriate responses to an enrolled member’s healthcare needs across the continuum of care. • Value-Based Program (VBP) is an outcomes-based payment arrangement and/or a coordinated care model facilitated with one or more local providers that is evaluated against cost and quality metrics/factors and is reflected in provider payment. • Provider Incentive is an additional amount of compensation paid to a healthcare provider by us, based on the provider’s compliance with agreed-upon procedural and/or outcome measures for a particular group of covered persons. Federal or state laws or regulations may require a surcharge, tax or other fee that applies to insured accounts. If applicable, we will include any such surcharge, tax or other fee as part of the claim charge passed on to you. • Enrolled Member Liability Calculation When covered healthcare services are provided outside of BCBSRI service area by nonparticipating providers, the amount an enrolled member pays for such services will generally be based on either the Host Blue’s nonparticipating provider local payment or the pricing arrangements required by applicable law. In these situations, the enrolled member may be responsible for the difference between the amount that the nonparticipating provider bills and the payment BCBSRI will make for the covered services as set forth in this paragraph. Federal or state law, as applicable, will govern payments, including but not limited to, emergency services, air ambulance services, and certain covered healthcare services rendered by a nonparticipating provider. • Exceptions In some exception cases, BCBSRI may pay claims from nonparticipating healthcare providers outside of BCBSRI service area based on the provider’s billed charge. This may occur in situations where an enrolled member did not have reasonable access to a participating provider, as determined by BCBSRI. In other exception cases, BCBSRI may pay such claims based on the payment BCBSRI would pay to a local nonparticipating provider (as described in the above subsection “How Non-network Providers Are Paid”). This may occur where the Host Blue’s corresponding payment would be more than BCBSRI in-service area nonparticipating provider payment. BCBSRI may choose to negotiate a payment with such a provider on an exception basis. Unless otherwise stated, in any of these exception situations, the enrolled member may be responsible for the difference between the amount that the nonparticipating healthcare provider bills and payment BCBSRI will make for the covered services as set forth in this paragraph. Blue Cross Blue Shield Global® Core If you are outside the United States (hereinafter “BlueCard service area”), you may be able to take advantage of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Global Core when accessing covered healthcare services. The Blue Cross Blue Shield Global Core is unlike the BlueCard Program available in the BlueCard service area in certain ways. For instance, although the Blue Cross Blue Shield Global Core assists you with accessing a network of inpatient, outpatient and professional providers, the network is not served by a Host Blue. As such, when you receive care from providers outside the BlueCard service area, you will typically have to pay the providers and submit the claims yourself to obtain reimbursement for these services. • Inpatient Services: In most cases, if you contact the service center for assistance, hospitals will not require you to pay for covered inpatient services, except for your cost-share amounts/deductibles, coinsurance, etc. In such cases, the hospital will submit your claims to the service center to begin claims processing. However, if you paid in full at the time of service, you must submit a claim to receive reimbursement for covered healthcare services. • Outpatient Services: Physicians, urgent care centers and other outpatient providers located outside the BlueCard service area will typically require you to pay in full at the time of service. You must submit a claim to obtain reimbursement for covered healthcare services. Preauthorization may be required for outpatient services. • Submitting a Blue Cross Blue Shield Global Core Claim: When you pay for covered healthcare services outside the BlueCard service area, you must submit a claim to obtain reimbursement. For institutional and professional claims, you should complete a Blue Cross Blue Shield Global Core claim form and send the claim form with the provider’s itemized bill(s) to the service center (the address is on the form) to initiate claims processing. Following the instructions on the claim form will help ensure timely processing of your claim. The claim form is available from BCBSRI, the service center or online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx. If you need assistance with your claim submission, you should call the service center at 0.000.000.XXXX (2583) or call collect at 0.000.000.0000, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

Most Referenced Clauses

Most Referenced Definitions