Table of Figures. Figure 1 - Headline results from the SHMA (2015) 5 Figure 2 – Process for the Strategic OAHN Spatial Options Study 7 Figure 3 – Inter-related Memoranda of Understanding 8 Figure 4 – Key matters of strategic cross-boundary significance (outside this MoU) 10 Figure 5 – The ‘Spatial Option’ of OAHN - 2011-2033 12 Figure 6 - AECOM scenario for how growth could be distributed 13 Figure 7 – Implementing and monitoring the tasks outlined by the MoU 14 Figure 8– The West Essex/East Hertfordshire area 20 Figure 9– Governance structure of the Co-op Member Board 22 Figure 10– The Functional Economic Market Area 24 Figure 11– Headline results from the Joint Economic Report (2015) 25 Figure 12– The ‘Options’ in the Strategic OAHN Spatial Options study 26 Figure 13 - Details of Options A to F and the ‘Spatial Option’ 28 Figure 14 - Key Member and Officer contacts 34
Table of Figures. Figure 1.1- The hierarchical structure of the lymphatic system 36 Figure 1.2- Active transmigration of leukocytes across lymphatic endothelium during inflammation 41 Figure 1.3- Proposed mechanism of lymphatic vessel activation following transplantation 42 Figure 1.4- Structure of the lymph node 51 Figure 2.1- Photograph showing dilated lymphatic vessel in the abdomen of an ephrin B2-/- mouse eight days after tamoxifen treatment. Original magnification 20x 60
Table of Figures. Figure 1: XXXXXX architecture for OCF v1.X 14 Figure 2: XXXXXX architecture 16 Figure 3: XXXXXX intra-federation 16 Figure 4: SFA drivers inside the AMs 18 Figure 5: Internal structure of SFA federation 18 Figure 6: FIBRE top-authorities 26 Figure 7: Fibre Federation Portal 26 Figure 8: FIBRE Federation Control Plane 27 Figure 9: LDAP and SFA Registry Synchronization 27 1 Acronyms AM Aggregate Manager API Application Programming Interface CDS Content Data Server CH Clearing House CN-DS Communication Networks and/or Distributed System CNPq Brazil’s Council for Scientific and Technological Development CPqD Telecommunications Research and Development Centre EC Experiment Controller ED Experiment Description EGW Export resource Gateway EU European Union FEDERICA Federated E-infrastructure Dedicated to European Researchers Innovating in Computing network Architectures FI Future Internet FIBRE Future Internet testbeds / experimentation between Brazil and Europe FIRE Future Internet Research & Experimentation FOAM Open Flow Aggregate Manager FP7 Seventh Framework Programme FPGA Field Programmable Gate Array Gbps Gigabit bits per second GENI Global Environment for Network Innovations GID GENI Identifier GMPLS Generalized MultiProtocol Label Switching GW Gateway HTTP HyperText Transfer Protocol ICT Information and Communication Technologies IGW Import Gateway (Aggregate Manager) IP Internet Protocol I&M Instrumentation and Measurements LDAP Lightweight Directory Access Protocol MS Milestone NICTA Australia’s Information Communications Technology Research Centre NITOS Network Implementation Testbed using Open Source platforms NOC Network Operations Centre NTP Network Time Protocol OAR Versatile Resource and Task Manager OCF XXXXXX Control Framework OEDL OMF Experiment Description Language OF OpenFlow XXXXXX OpenFlow in Europe: Linking Infrastructure and Applications OGF Open Grid Forum OMF cOntrol, Management and Measurement Framework OML ORBIT Measurement Library ORBIT Open-Access Research Testbed for Next-Generation Wireless Networks ORCA Open Resource Control Architecture OS Operation System PLE PlanetLab Europe R Repository RC Resource Controller REST Representational State Transfer RFC Request for Comments RM Resource Manager RNP RSpec National Research and Education Network Resource Specification SensLab Very Large Scale Open Wireless Sensor Network Testbed SFA Slice-based Federation Architecture SM Slice Manager SQL Structures Query Language UFF Federal Flum...
Table of Figures. Figure 2 - Tweets reporting various concerns about a city spanning power supply, water quality, traffic jams, and public transport delays. 16 Figure 3 - Addressing ambiguity: challenge for event extraction - tweets reporting very different events using the same event term "accident". 18 Figure 4 - Describing a stream annotation workflow using the CityPulse Information Model 21 Figure 5 - Depiction of the main concepts and relationships in the Stream Annotation Ontology 19 Figure 6 - Overview of Complex Event Service Ontology. 20 Figure 7 - Quality Ontology 24 Figure 8 – The architecture of peer-to-peer (left) and broker-messaging communication (right). A peer-to-peer communication can provide a robust peer-to-peer real-time communication, while a message broker can better deal with event-driven communication and reduce the communication complexity in crowded networks where a peer can participate as a client, service or both. 25 Figure 9 – The message exchange models of HTTP Polling (left), HTTP Long Polling (centre), and WebSocket protocols 26 Figure 10 - Communication and (de-)serialisation between two components 27 Figure 11 - A visual representation of geographical coordinates on Google Map for a pair of road traffic sensors provided by city of Aarhus, Denmark 29 Figure 12 - A real time average speed data obtained from a pair of sensor points is mapped into SAX word, "bbbbacdd", with the segment size of ``8'' and alphabet size of ``4'' for 176 samples. 30 Figure 13 - Summary of the evaluation results for the raw and the sax stream data based on the average message delivery time and data size. The bars refer to the following metrics: number of consumers for each data dimension, namely SAX and raw (Figure 13a); stream data dimension and data size (Figure 13c); the segment and the alphabet size for each SAX stream data (Figure 13b and Figure 13d). 32
Table of Figures. Figure 3-1: The LIAA Workflow 9
Table of Figures. Figure 1: The benefits of the PlastiCircle approach 9 Figure 2: Quantitative information of pilot cities 13 Figure 3: Qualitative information of pilot cities 14 Figure 4: The four phases of the PlastiCircle Approach 15 Figure 5: Application of the PA in the pilot cities 18 Figure 6: Containers of Valencia 20 Figure 7: Utrecht underground container 23 Figure 8: Recycled plastic bench in Utrecht with PlastiCircle inscription 24 Figure 9: PlastiCircle participant taking plastic waste to dedicated container in Alba Iulia 25 Figure 10: PlastiCircle team handing welcome kit to participant in Alba Iulia 27 Figure 11: Monitoring and progress evaluation pyramid 39 This document presents how the PlastiCircle approach was implemented by the three pilot cities (Valencia in Spain, Utrecht in the Netherlands, and Alba Iulia in Romania) and what steps should be taken by other cities interested in acquiring the technologies and implementing the concept. This final replication guide aims at: • providing a knowledge base to map risks, identify vulnerabilities and other factors that make planning less effective; • presenting and explain good practices that can be implemented to guarantee better results; • separating the best recommendations for cities interested in replicating the approach, and • showing the variances and similarities of the PA in different backgrounds. The three pilot cities also share their lessons-learnt, as well as their recommendations so that other municipalities and cities can run a smoother path when adapting the PA.
Table of Figures. Figure 6A.1 Migration routes of waterfowl and coastal birds along Absheron-Gobustan coastal line. ↑ to North, ↓ to South, → to South-East 5 Figure 6A.2 Highly sensitive internationally important winter gathering places of waterfowl in Absheron-Gobustan coastline of the Caspian Sea (2013-2016) 6 Figure 6A.3 Key nesting sites of coastal birds in the Absheron-Gobustan coastline 10
Table of Figures. Figure 1 - Input parameters sheet 6 Figure 2 – Sample section 1 from Output Result sheet 9 Figure 3 – Sample Section 2 from Output Result sheet 10 Figure 4 – Sample section 3 from Output Result sheet 11 Figure 5 – Sample section 4 from Output Result sheet 12 Figure 6 – Sample section 5 from Output Result sheet 12 Figure 7 - Inputs for critical chloride content 13 Figure 8 - Inputs for initial chloride content 13 Figure 9 - Inputs for chloride content at surface or at substitute surface at depth ∆x 13 Figure 10 - Inputs for concrete cover 13 Figure 11 - Inputs for transfer function 14 Figure 12 - Inputs for chloride migration coefficient 14 Figure 13 - Inputs for temperature of the structural element or the ambient air 14 Figure 14 - Inputs for ageing exponent 14 Figure 15 - Inputs for design service life 14 Figure 16 - Inputs for target reliability index 14 Figure 18 – (a) analysis running; (b) analysis complete 15 Figure 19 - Results 15
Table of Figures. Figure 1. The E-ARK Knowledge Centre Architecture Model. 10 Figure 2. The Knowledge Centre Services Aggregator home page. 10 Figure 3. Resources Centre Page 11 Figure 4. EVOC Main Layout. 12 Figure 5. EVOC Top Toolbar 13 Figure 6. EVOC User Options Menu. 13 Figure 7. EVOC Top Toolbar without a user logged. 14 Figure 8. EVOC User Login Menu 14 Figure 9. EVOC User Registration Menu 14 Figure 10. EVOC Public Space when a Group is selected. 15 Figure 11. EVOC Public Space when a Vocabulary is selected. 16 Figure 12. EVOC Public Space when a Term is selected 16 Figure 13. EVOC Vocabulary Management View layout 17 Figure 14. Space, Group and Vocabulary management buttons. 17 Figure 15. Space, Group and Vocabulary create menu. 18 Figure 16. Form to create a new Space. 18 Figure 17. Form to create a new Group 19 Figure 18. Form to create a new Space. 20 Figure 19. EVOC Vocabulary Management View right panel layout. 21 Figure 20. EVOC Vocabulary Management View Export options. 21 Figure 21. Term Management buttons. 21 Figure 22. Form to create a new Term. 22 Figure 23. Import terms layout. 22 Figure 24. Import terms management buttons. 23 Figure 25. Terms representations. 23 Figure 26. EVOC Configuration View - Vocabularies External Setup. 24 Figure 27. EVOC User Management menu 25 Figure 28. EVOC User grouping. 25 Figure 29. REQs Home Page. 26 Figure 30. REQs top toolbar 27 Figure 31. REQs Overview Page. 27 Figure 32. REQs Navigation Panel. 28 Figure 33. REQs Navigation Panel Header. 28 Figure 34. REQs Navigation Panel – document selection 29 Figure 35. REQs Content Panel. 29 Figure 36. REQs content panel with multiple sections. 30 Figure 37. REQS Content Panel links. 30 Figure 38. REQs Content Panel link target. 31 Figure 39. REQs Requirement layout. 31 Figure 40. EVOC Data Domain Model. 32 Figure 41. REQs Data Domain Model. 33 Figure 42. Assessment Services Page 34 Figure 43. MoReq Export Validator Service main layout 35 Figure 44. Examples panel layout 36 Figure 45. Validation Report layout 37 Figure 46. Example of a list of errors that occurred during XSD validation 37 Figure 47. Maturity Assessment Service 38 Figure 48. Examples of Maturity Assessment Results. 39 Figure 49. MoReq Assessment Use Cases. 41 Figure 50. Base technology stack. 43
Table of Figures. Figure 24-1 Sequence of Events for Freeway Agreements and Controlled Access Highway Agreements 24-21 Figure 24-2 Freeway Agreement Exhibit Map - Symbol 24-26 Figure 24-3 Freeway Agreement Exhibit Map - Geometric 24-27 Figure 24-4 Freeway Agreement Notes and Symbols Example 1 24-28 Figure 24-5 Freeway Agreement Notes and Symbols Example 2 24-29 CHAPTER 24 – Freeway Agreements
