Trial Period and Evaluation Sample Clauses

Trial Period and Evaluation. If the Hospital and a simple majority of the employees in a unit mutually agree to implementing a twelve (12) hour shift schedule, the changes to implement a compressed work week will be in effect for a trial period of eighteen (18) weeks. Any problems or disputes arising from the required changes to implement the compressed work week program will not be the subject of the grievance procedure but will be discussed and resolved locally by the parties.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Trial Period and Evaluation. The parties agree that the compressed work week program will be implemented for a trial period, not to exceed sixteen weeks from the date of commencement of the program in the individual department or unit. Each individual department or unit, if approved by the Employer to adopt a compressed work week schedule, will undergo the trial period. During the trial period, the program will be evaluated separately by the Employer and the employees participating at the end of eight (8) and twelve (12) weeks, in order to ascertain the wishes of the Employer and employees as to continuation beyond the initial sixteen (16) week trial period. The program may be terminated at any time during the trial period if deemed unsatisfactory by the Employer or seventy-five percent (75%) of the departmental or unit employees affected. Any problems or disputes arising from the required changes to implement the compressed work week program will not be the subject of the grievance procedure but will be discussed and resolved locally by the parties.
Trial Period and Evaluation. Prior to the implementation of a trial extended shift schedule the Employer will post work schedules for the unit affected a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance so that employees affected can individually evaluate the impact of the program. If the Employer and eighty per cent (80%) of the employees in a unit mutually agree to implementing an extended shift schedule, the changes to implement a compressed work week will be in effect for a trial period of six (6) months. The program will be evaluated separately by the Employer and the Union participating in the program at the end of the fourth (4th) month in order to ascertain whether to continue the program beyond the initial six (6) month period.
Trial Period and Evaluation. The parties agree that the compressed work week program will be implemented for a trial period, not to exceed sixteen weeks from the date of commencement of the program in the individual department or unit. Each individual department or unit, if approved by the Employer to adopt a compressed work week schedule, will undergo the trial period. During the trial period, the program will be evaluated separately by the Employer and the employees participating at the end of eight (8) and twelve (12) weeks, in order to ascertain the wishes of the Employer and employees as to continuation beyond the initial sixteen (1 6) week trial period. The program may be terminated at any time during the trial period if deemed unsatisfactory by the Employer or percent (75%) of the departmental or unit employees affected. Any problems or disputes arising from the required changes to implement the compressed work week program will not be the subject of the grievance procedure but will be discussed and resolved locally by the parties. All full-time and part-time employees assigned to a department or unit implementing the compressed work week program will be required to participate. Continuation: Continuation of the compressed work week program beyond the initial trial period will be based upon the trial period evaluations and the support shown by the employees affected. Thereafter, the parties agree that if either Appendix on Local percent (75%) of the department or unit employees affected or the Employer wish to discontinue the scheduling of the compressed work week, there will be discussion at the local level as to the reasons for the change and in any event, written notice advising the other party of their wish to discontinue must be given at least four (4) weeks prior to the date such party wishes to return to the work week as set out in the Collective Agreement. Should the compressed work week be discontinued in all departments or units, all reference to it in the Collective Agreement will be deleted.
Trial Period and Evaluation. All employees promoted to the rank of Sergeant/Lieutenant shall be appointed initially for a six (6) month trial period; however, this period may be extended for an additional six (6) months upon the recommendation of such employee's Captain. Newly appointed Sergeants and Lieutenants shall be evaluated monthly during their trial period. During the evaluation period, an employee may be returned to the rank previously held at the discretion of the Chief of Corrections for cause and such return shall not be grievable or arbitrable. The returned employee will retain their seniority previously held at the lower rank. After satisfactorily completing the trial period, such promotions shall be considered permanent, subject to the usual performance and disciplinary requirements. All newly promoted employees shall be evaluated at the end of the trial period by their immediate supervisors. 34.4.1 A Corrections Officer training to be a Sergeant will be paid at the Corrections Officer pay rate. A Sergeant training to be a Lieutenant will be paid at the Sergeants pay rate. The Officers and Sergeants in training are required to complete all training assignments under the instructions of a supervisor. They are not authorized to approve reports until the effective date of their promotion. Should any part of the training curriculum be missed for any reason, that training must be made up in order for the training to be considered complete. 34.4.2 A Training agreement for any/all future promotions is as follows: 34.4.2.1 Training will take place prior to the date of promotion in rank. 34.4.2.2 Trainee will not be eligible for voluntary overtime and shall not be ordered to work mandatory overtime during this period. 34.4.3 Newly promoted Sergeants and Lieutenants will be offered roster vacancies that are available at the time of their promotion date.
Trial Period and Evaluation. The parties agree that the compressed work week Program will be implemented for a trial period, not to exceed sixteen weeks from the date of commencement of the program in the individual department or unit. Each individual department or unit, if approved by the employer to adopt a compressed workweek schedule, will undergo the trial period.
Trial Period and Evaluation. All Deputies promoted to the rank of Sergeant/Lieutenant shall be appointed initially for a six (6) month trial period; however, this period may be extended for an additional six
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Trial Period and Evaluation

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not increase your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for the life of the contract, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIPS, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from the “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, with any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they may apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@xxxx-xxx.xxx If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law clauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to read as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!