University Review Sample Clauses

University Review. 1) The University's written response will be issued to the grievant and the representative, if any, within fifteen (15) calendar days after the formal grievance is filed. If the response is not issued within this time limit, or if the grievance is not resolved at Step 1, the grievance may proceed to Step 2.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (21)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
University Review. The traditional Faculty governance bodies, specifically the Faculty Senate and the Graduate Council, shall be responsible for preparing their final analysis and recommendations to the Board of Trustees within the specified deadline. Thereafter, the Board of Trustees shall make the final decision on the proposed plan. If the proposed plan undergoes substantive modification(s) once it has been submitted, with unit and Association reports to the Faculty Senate or Graduate Council, the Chair or Director of the affected unit(s) shall be informed of the modifications.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
University Review a. Grievances may be submitted to Step 3 when:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
University Review. All contracts between SMG and subcontractors shall be subject to the review and prior approval of the University before becoming operative. Specifically, any provision in any contract concerning the controls on the quality of food to be provided at the Convocation Center shall receive the prior approval of the University. The provisions of Section 5.1 regarding the approval by the University of Event contracts shall also be applicable to the approval by the University of subcontracts. Subject to the provisions of the next sentence, subcontracts which involve only a single Event at the Convocation Center shall be exempt from the provisions of this Section 15.2. Any subcontract (even if involving only a single Event) between SMG, as manager of the Convocation Center, and any general partner of SMG, or any business entity or enterprise affiliated with SMG or any partner thereof, shall be of no force and effect without the approval of the University. The University hereby approves SMG to sell sponsorships in the Convocation Center or relating to Events to be presented therein, and the payment of commissions and cost of sales to SMG on the sale of any such sponsorships.
Sample 1
University Review. Proposals specifically conceiving new degrees or altered degree requirements must also undergo review by the Faculty Council’s Committee on Curriculum and Programs (CCP) and be approved by the Faculty Council. While the SNL initiatives process is modeled after the university process to be efficient for the proposer proposals falling into university review categories should review and strictly adhere to the requirements provided in the CCP guidelines. Proposers should work closely with the SNL CCP representative.
Sample 1

Related to University Review

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Diversity Report The Contractor shall report to each Customer, spend with certified and other minority business enterprises. These reports shall include the period covered, the name, minority code and Federal Employer Identification Number of each minority business utilized during the period, Commodities provided by the minority business enterprise, and the amount paid to each minority business on behalf of each purchasing agency ordering under the terms of this Contract.

  • Professional Development Reimbursement Management will provide reimbursement for approved professional development expenses for Lieutenants and Sergeants. Funds may be used for the purpose of improving job performance, maintaining and increasing proficiency, preparing Lieutenants and Sergeants for greater responsibility, or increasing promotional opportunities. Management must approve of the specific professional development request in advance. Denial will require written notification to the requesting Lieutenant or Sergeant.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.