University Review Sample Clauses

University Review. 1) The University's written response will be issued to the grievant and the representative, if any, within fifteen (15) calendar days after the formal grievance is filed. If the response is not issued within this time limit, or if the grievance is not resolved at Step 1, the grievance may proceed to Step 2. 2) Resolution of the grievance at Step 1 or earlier, although final, shall not be precedent-setting.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (21)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
University Review. The traditional Faculty governance bodies, specifically the Faculty Senate and the Graduate Council, shall be responsible for preparing their final analysis and recommendations to the Board of Trustees within the specified deadline. Thereafter, the Board of Trustees shall make the final decision on the proposed plan. If the proposed plan undergoes substantive modification(s) once it has been submitted, with unit and Association reports to the Faculty Senate or Graduate Council, the Chair or Director of the affected unit(s) shall be informed of the modifications.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
University Review a. Grievances may be submitted to Step 3 when: 1) an employee grievance is not resolved, or written answer is not sent, within ten (10) work days after the Step 2 meeting; 2) the Union is filing a grievance; or 3) the grievance is the result of a suspension without pay or a discharge. b. All such grievances must be received by the Berkeley Campus Personnel Office within ten (10) work days after the grievant knew or should have known of the facts qualifying for a Step 3 grievance. c. Grievances which are initiated at Step 3 shall be reduced to writing on a form agreed to by the parties. The grievance shall be dated and signed by the grievant and shall set forth the information listed in Step 2, Article 24.B.2.b. d. Upon receipt of the written grievance by the University, a University Review Committee shall be convened to meet with the grievant and his or her representative, if any, to review the grievance, and to attempt to reach a resolution of the grievance. Within ten (10) work days after receipt of the step 3 grievance, the parties shall set a time and place for the University Review Committee Meeting. This is the last step for the grievant or his/her representative to present known facts or information which supports the grievant's contentions. e. The University Review Committee shall consider all information presented in the meeting, and must respond to the grievant in writing within ten (10) work days of the conclusion of the meeting. The decision becomes final on the twenty-first (21st) work day after the date of issuance, unless a timely request for arbitration is received from the Union on or before the twentieth (20th) work day. A copy of the decision will be mailed to the employee's representative and to the Union.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
University Review. All contracts between SMG and subcontractors shall be subject to the review and prior approval of the University before becoming operative. Specifically, any provision in any contract concerning the controls on the quality of food to be provided at the Convocation Center shall receive the prior approval of the University. The provisions of Section 5.1 regarding the approval by the University of Event contracts shall also be applicable to the approval by the University of subcontracts. Subject to the provisions of the next sentence, subcontracts which involve only a single Event at the Convocation Center shall be exempt from the provisions of this Section 15.
Sample 1
University Review. Proposals specifically conceiving new degrees or altered degree requirements must also undergo review by the Faculty Council’s Committee on Curriculum and Programs (CCP) and be approved by the Faculty Council. While the SNL initiatives process is modeled after the university process to be efficient for the proposer proposals falling into university review categories should review and strictly adhere to the requirements provided in the CCP guidelines. Proposers should work closely with the SNL CCP representative.
Sample 1

Related to University Review

  • Diversity Report The Contractor shall report to each Customer, spend with certified and other minority business enterprises. These reports shall include the period covered, the name, minority code and Federal Employer Identification Number of each minority business utilized during the period, Commodities provided by the minority business enterprise, and the amount paid to each minority business on behalf of each purchasing agency ordering under the terms of this Contract.

  • Research Analyst Independence The Company acknowledges that the Underwriters’ research analysts and research departments are required to be independent from their respective investment banking divisions and are subject to certain regulations and internal policies, and that such Underwriters’ research analysts may hold views and make statements or investment recommendations and/or publish research reports with respect to the Company and/or the offering that differ from the views of their respective investment banking divisions. The Company hereby waives and releases, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any claims that the Company may have against the Underwriters with respect to any conflict of interest that may arise from the fact that the views expressed by their independent research analysts and research departments may be different from or inconsistent with the views or advice communicated to the Company by such Underwriters’ investment banking divisions. The Company acknowledges that each of the Underwriters is a full service securities firm and as such from time to time, subject to applicable securities laws, may effect transactions for its own account or the account of its customers and hold long or short positions in debt or equity securities of the companies that may be the subject of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • University Any notice may be served upon the University by delivering it, in writing, to the University at the address set forth on the last page of this Agreement, by depositing it in a United States Postal Service deposit box with the postage fully prepaid and with the notice addressed to the University at the aforementioned address, or by sending a facsimile of it to the University facsimile number set forth on the last page of this Agreement.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Principal Investigator The Research will be supervised by __________________ ("Principal Investigator"). If for any reason the individual is unable to continue to serve as Principal Investigator and a successor acceptable to both the University and the Sponsor is not available, this agreement shall be terminated as provided in Article 9. The Principal Investigator may work with others at the University (“Associates”) in conducting the Research.

  • Investigator Where a difference arises between the parties relating to the dismissal, discipline or suspension of an employee, or to the interpretation, application, operation or alleged violation of this agreement, including any questions as to whether a matter is arbitrable, during the term of the collective agreement, an arbitrator agreed to by the parties shall, at the request of either party: (a) investigate the difference; (b) define the issue in the difference; and (c) make written recommendations to resolve the difference within five days of the date of receipt of the request and for those five days from that date time does not run in respect of the grievance procedure. The parties agree that this procedure will not be invoked until the grievance procedure has been completed.

  • System Security Review All systems processing and/or storing County PHI or PI must have at least an annual system risk assessment/security review which provides assurance that administrative, physical, and technical controls are functioning effectively and providing adequate levels of protection. Reviews should include vulnerability scanning tools.

  • Laboratory Services Covered Services include prescribed diagnostic clinical and anatomic pathological laboratory services and materials when authorized by a Member's PCP and HPN’s Managed Care Program.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!