Evaluation Rating means the final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher pursuant to terms of this policy. The evaluation rating is assigned at the conclusion of the evaluation cycle when the teacher performance rating is combined with the results of student growth measures where fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation rating is based on student growth measures as provided for in this policy and fifty percent (50%) the evaluation rating is based on a teacher performance rating as provided for in this policy. Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of one of the following evaluation ratings to Accomplished, Proficient, Developing, or Ineffective.
Evaluation Rating means the final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a school counselor pursuant to terms of this policy. The evaluation rating is assigned at the conclusion of the evaluation cycle when the school counselor performance rating is combined with the results of student metrics. Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of one (1) of the following evaluation ratings to Accomplished, Skilled, Developing, or Ineffective.
Evaluation Rating means the final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher pursuant to terms of this policy. The evaluation rating is assigned at the conclusion of the evaluation cycle when the teacher performance rating is combined with the results of student growth measures where fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation rating is based on student growth measures as provided for in this policy and fifty percent (50%) the evaluation rating is based on a teacher performance rating as provided for in this policy Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of one of the following evaluation ratings to Accomplished, Skilled, Developing, or Ineffective. “Student Growth” – for the purpose of the district’s evaluation policy, student growth is defined as the change in student achievement for an individual student between two or more points in time. “Student Learning Objectives” (“SLOs”) – include goals identified by a teacher or group of teachers that identify expected learning outcomes or growth targets for a group of students over a period of time. “Shared Attribution Measures” – student growth measures that can be attributed to a group. "Teacher Performance" – is the assessment of a teacher’s performance, resulting in a performance rating. As an evaluation factor, the teacher performance dimension is based on direct observations of a teacher’s practice (including materials and other instructional artifacts) and walkthroughs that are performed by a credentialed evaluator. Teacher performance results are reported as a teacher performance rating that may be coded as “1” indicating lowest performance to “4” indicating highest performance. "Teacher-Student Data Linkage" (TSDL) – refers to the process of connecting the teacher(s) of record [based upon above definition] to a student and/or defined group of students’ achievement scores for the purpose of attributing student growth to that teacher.
Examples of Evaluation Rating in a sentence
Beginning with the 2015-16 academic school year, the Weld Re-5J School District shall ensure that a nonprobationary Teacher who objects to a second consecutive Performance Evaluation Rating of ineffective or partially effective has an opportunity to appeal that rating.
A detailed, written plan collaboratively developed between the teacher and evaluator, utilized when a teacher receives an Evaluation Rating of ineffective.
The principal will place a teacher on a Monitored Professional Development Plan whenever he or she is rated Developing on one or more standards on the Teacher Summary Evaluation Rating Form.
Process for Nonprobationary Teacher to Appeal a Second Consecutive Performance Evaluation Rating of Ineffective or Partially Effective The following requirements shall apply to the appeal process developed by the Weld Re-5 School District for a nonprobationary Teacher to appeal a second consecutive Performance Evaluation Rating of ineffective or partially effective.
In this case, the Evaluator and Educator shall analyze the discrepancy between the Summative Evaluation Rating and the rating for impact on student learning to seek to determine the cause(s) of the discrepancy.
More Definitions of Evaluation Rating
Evaluation Rating. The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “Accomplished”, “Skilled”, “Developing”, or “Ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.
Evaluation Rating. The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “Accomplished”, “Skilled”, “Developing”, or “Ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating. Evidence: Information collected by the evaluator and/or information provided to the credentialed evaluator by the teacher, to support and inform the accurate reflection of the Evaluation Factors. Examples include, but are not limited to, student information affecting educational progress, student interest or learning style surveys, newsletters, classroom rules, lesson plans, student portfolios, summative assessments, and student work samples. High-Quality Student Data (HQSD): Quantitative information derived from instrument(s) rigorously reviewed and approved by locally determined education experts, which provide evidence of student learning that can be directly attributed to the teacher being evaluated.
Evaluation Rating the Teacher received a Highly Effective or Effective overall evaluation rating for the prior year.
Evaluation Rating means the final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher pursuant to terms of this policy. The evaluation rating is assigned at the conclusion of the evaluation cycle when the evaluation factors are combined. Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of one (1) of the following evaluation ratings: Accomplished, Skilled, Developing, or Ineffective. "Teacher Performance" – is the assessment of a teacher’s performance, resulting in a performance rating. As an evaluation factor, the teacher performance dimension is based on direct observations of a teacher’s practice (including materials and other instructional artifacts) and walkthroughs that are performed by a credentialed evaluator. Teacher performance results are reported as a teacher performance rating that may be coded as "1" indicating lowest performance to "4" indicating highest performance. "Teacher-Student Data Linkage" (TSDL) – refers to the process of connecting the teacher(s) of record (based upon above definition) to a student and/or defined group of students’ achievement scores for the purpose of attributing student growth to that teacher.
Evaluation Rating means the final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher pursuant to terms of this policy. The evaluation rating is assigned at the conclusion of the evaluation cycle when the teacher performance rating is combined with the results of student growth measures where fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation rating is based on student growth measures as provided for in this policy and fifty percent (50%) the evaluation rating is based on a teacher performance rating as provided for in this policy. Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of one of the following evaluation ratings to Accomplished, Skilled, Developing, or Ineffective. ‟Student Growth” – means a unit of academic growth projected for a student over specified period of time, and which has been established according to a set of procedures defined either by the value-added data system provider employed by the State of Ohio or by the school district for approved vendor assessments or locally developed student learning objectives (SLOs). ‟Student Learning Objectives” (‟SLOs”) – A measurable academic growth target that is set at the beginning of the course/term for all students or for subgroups of students to be achieved by completion of an established interval based upon baseline data gathered at the beginning of the course. ‟Shared Attribution Measures” – encompasses student growth measures that can be attributed to a group as determined in consultation with the Student Growth Measures Committee. ‟Value-Added” – refers to the EVAAS Value-Added methodology provided by SAS, Inc., which provides a measure of student progress at the district and school level based on each student’s scores on state issued standardized assessments. ‟Vendor Assessment” – student assessments approved by the Ohio Department of Education that measure mastery of the course content for the appropriate grade level, which may include nationally normed standardized assessments, industry certification exams, or end-of-course examinations for grade level and subjects for which the Value-Added measure does not apply. ‟Remediation Plan” – refers to a written plan which shall be collaboratively put into place with the teacher and the assigned credentialed evaluator, in order to directly address any deficiencies cited in the evidence that is gathered during walkthroughs and formal observations. The Remediation Form (See Appendix H) will be utilized for this purpose. ‟Teacher Performance” – is the assessment of ...
Evaluation Rating means the final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The evaluation rating is assigned at the conclusion of the evaluation cycle when the teacher performance rating is combined with the results of student growth measures where fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation rating is based on student growth measures as provided for in this Agreement and fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation rating is based on a teacher performance rating as provided for in this Agreement. Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of one of the following evaluation ratings to the Accomplished, Skilled, Developing, or Ineffective. The Credential Evaluator will use a holistic approach when scoring the Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric. Any changes to this language will be discusses and agreed upon by the BOE and the GEA.
Evaluation Rating. – means the final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher pursuant to terms of this policy. The evaluation rating is assigned at the conclusion of the evaluation cycle when the teacher performance rating is combined with the results of student growth measures where fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation rating is based on student growth measures as provided for in this policy and fifty percent (50%) the evaluation rating is based on a teacher performance rating as provided for in this policy Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of one of the following evaluation ratings to Accomplished, Skilled, Developing, or Ineffective.