Bureau of Reclamation Sample Clauses
Bureau of Reclamation. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (hereinafter called USBR) manages, develops, and protects water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public (43 U.S.C. Chapter 12). In accordance with the authority delegated in 255 DM 14.1 (U.S. Department of the Interior, Departmental Manual), which states that the Commissioner is delegated so much of the authority of the Secretary under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. § 661 et seq.) as is necessary to provide assistance, through grants or cooperative agreements, to public or private organizations for the improvement of fish and wildlife habitat associated with water systems or water supplies affected by Reclamation projects; and in accordance with the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-11), Subtitle F- Secure Water, §§ 9502, 9504, and 9509, the USBR is authorized to enter into a cooperative agreement to continue the Great Basin CESU to assist in providing research, technical assistance, and education.
Bureau of Reclamation. ● Reclamation will assign a PM with responsibilities for managing the timely completion oftasks and review ofmaterials as described in the PMP as well as coordinating the identification and resolution ofpotential issues. ● The PM will be responsible for coordinating ESA, NEPA, and other necessary compliance required for the Project. ● Reclamation’s PM will coordinate updates to the PMP, as necessary throughout the process. ● Reclamation will identify an executive sponsor with authorities and responsibilities for addressing policy-level issues as appropriate, coordinating with the Parties to this Memorandum as needed to complete tasks described in this Memorandum, and to identify and resolve issues. ● Reclamation will be the Federal action agency as it relates to its ESA Section 7 responsibilities. ● Provide analyses regarding potential e fects ofthe Proposed Action to federally-listed species and certain proposed species and their designated or proposed critical habitats. ● Explore potential alternative approaches to operate the CVP and SWP for all Project purposes. ● Evaluate the Proposed Action and alternatives in compliance with NEPA through preparation ofan EIS. ● Develop a Proposed Action that reflects current conditions, incorporates new planned facilities, and includes a suite ofactions to meet the requirements of ESA Sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2). ● Reclamation will secure a contractor and appropriate funding to help facilitate outreach, technical analysis, alternatives development, preparation ofan EIS, preparation ofa BA, and the preparation ofan administrative record documenting decision-making. The contractor will only take direction from Reclamation. ● Reclamation will assume appropriate legal responsibilities under the issued final BiOp(s) from USFWS and NMFS. ● Reclamation will facilitate coordination with CVP contractors who are not included as Parties to this MOU and stakeholders.
Bureau of Reclamation. The Authority may enter into a contract or other arrangement with the Bureau of Reclamation (“Reclamation”) to carry out the purposes of this Agreement.
Bureau of Reclamation. 1996 - Present Temperature Control Device, Hydropower Optimization, Endangered Species, Water Quality, Habitat Restoration, Selective Withdrawal, and Reservoir Stratification This Good Practice illustrates a successful case study of habitat restoration and hydropower optimization. During the period of late 1980s to the mid-1990s, the Bureau of Reclamation spilled cold water through Shasta Dam’s low-level river outlets to provide proper water temperatures for salmon downstream, instead of passing water through the hydro turbines. A Temperature Control Device (TCD), with a unique selective withdrawal system that routes water through Shasta Powerhouse, has provided the answer to maintaining the required water temperature for fish and at the same time, generating clean inexpensive electricity. An aerial view of the TCD, Shasta Dam and power plant is shown in Figure 1.
Bureau of Reclamation. Technical Representative: Insert the name of the Reclamation technical specialist that will be collaborating on this project and representing Reclamation’s interests
Bureau of Reclamation. The Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 1935, provided the initial Federal authority for the CVP. On Dec. 2, 1935, the president approved a finding of feasibility by the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to the Reclamation Act of 1902. The Rivers and Harbors Act of August 26, 1937, brought the CVP under Reclamation Law and authorized the construction, operation and maintenance. On October 6, 1992, Section 3406(a) of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA), Public Law 102-575, amended the project purposes of the CVP to include fish and wildlife purposes.
Bureau of Reclamation. Reclamation constructed, operates, and maintains the CVP as authorized by the Act of August 26, 1937 (50 Stat. 850), and all acts amendatory or supplemental thereto including but not limited to, the First Deficiency Appropriation Act, Fiscal Year 1936 (49 Stat. 1622); the Act of October 17, 1940 (54 Stat. 1198, 1199); the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887); the Act of October 14, 1949 (63 Stat. 852); the Act of September 26, 1950 (64 Stat. 1036); the Act of August 27, 1954 (68 Stat. 879); the Act of August 12, 1955 (69 Stat. 719); the Act of June 3, 1960 (74 Stat. 156); the Act of October 23, 1962 (76 Stat. 1173); the Act of September 2, 1965 (79 Stat. 615); the Act of August 19, 1967 (81 Stat. 167); the Act of August 27, 1967 (81 Stat. 173); the Act of October 23, 1970 (84 Stat. 1097); the Act of September 28, 1976 (90 Stat. 1324); the Act ofDecember 22, 1980 (94 Stat. 3339); the Act of October 27, 1986 (100 Stat. 3050); the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (106 Stat. 4706); the Act of November 5, 1990 (104 Stat. 2074); the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act (123 Stat. 1349, Title X); and the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (130 Stat. 1628, Title III, Subtitle J).
Bureau of Reclamation. Participants in the Wanapa Energy Center have requested that plant discharge water be discharged into Cold Springs Reservoir, part of Reclamation’s Umatilla Basin Project, a federal irrigation project. Reclamation must decide whether to approve crossing of Reclamation lands and easements, and use of facilities. The decision to permit crossing of lands and easements would consider potential impacts to operations and maintenance of facilities, to irrigation, to Cold Springs National Wildlife Refuge, and to water quality. The decision to permit use of facilities to store water for irrigation use is further dependent upon the Hermiston Irrigation District complying with Oregon Water Resources Department criteria to use the water for irrigation, and then subsequently entering into a Xxxxxx Act Contract with Reclamation for use of excess capacity in Cold Springs Reservoir. Reclamation’s decision would be documented in a ROD.
Bureau of Reclamation. Xxxxx Xxxxxx Environmental Services Manager Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region 0000 Xxxxxx Xx, Boise, ID 83706 Office: 000-000-0000 Xxxx Xxxxxxx Director of Public Works 000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Cheney, WA 99004 Office: 000-000-0000
Bureau of Reclamation. Technical Representative