COMMISSIONING PROCESS. The project’s commissioning plan and specific commissioning requirements that the QESP will develop shall include at least the following: • Qualifications and affiliation of the Commissioning Agent (CxA), including project staff licensed by the State of Connecticut as Professional Engineers in mechanical or electrical engineering and project staff certified in building commissioning by the Building Commissioning Association or the Association of Energy Engineers; • Roles and responsibilities of CxA, including directing the commissioning team in the completion of the commissioning requirements, overseeing or performing the commissioning tests, and verifying the adequacy of the commissioning results; • Roles and responsibilities of QESP, Department, and Department’s commissioning representative, including witnessing of commissioning activities; • Process that will be followed to document the design intent or Department’s project requirements for each ESM or system, including: o Operational parameters, such as temperature setback capabilities or operator interface features, o Requirements for design details or ancillary items, such as sensors, valves, access, electrical, existing Goods demolition, etc., and o Performance requirements, such as Equipment efficiencies, or ton-hours of chilled water to be delivered; • Requirements for Department reviews or submittal approvals; • Schedule for developing and approving a commissioning plan, including expected content such as: o Pre-functional inspections, o Functional testing procedures, and o Required use of manufacturers’ start-up procedures; • Requirements for the documentation of the Department’s attendance at the various tests and the Department’s approval that the tests followed the specified procedures and meet or exceed the expected results; • Plan for seasonal testing and conditional acceptance, if needed; • Contents and timing of periodic project reports, Final Commissioning Report, and Systems Manual; • Requirements for CxA oversight of O&M training; and • Plan for warranty walk-though or other follow-up procedures. QESP shall be responsible for successful performance of commissioning activities by the CxA during the design phase, including: • Meeting with Department to review project design and approve Equipment submittals; • Documenting the design intent for each ESM or system; • Developing a draft commissioning plan, including the specifics of all pre-functional inspections and functional performance t...
COMMISSIONING PROCESS. The commissioning process outlines a quality-orientated methodology for verifying and documenting the commissioning and functional testing of (i) each Block and (ii) the Facility. The commissioning process is intended to help ensure that all system components meet defined objectives and criteria, as established in this Agreement. The commissioning process is designed to support the entire engineering, procurement and construction process, and consists of the following phases: (1) Planning Phase, (2) Construction Phase, and (3) Functional Test Phase. The phases and activities are described below.
COMMISSIONING PROCESS. 1 Commissioning during construction begins with a scope meeting conducted by the CxA where the commissioning process is reviewed with the commissioning team members.
COMMISSIONING PROCESS. 1 Replace article 2.8 with - Project commissioning is to comply with the CSA Z320- 11 Standard. .7 Article 2.9.5.3 Submissions:
COMMISSIONING PROCESS. B2i On commissioning the Writer and the Manager shall agree: a a delivery date for the treatment (if required) b a delivery date for the first full draft c a basic schedule of script development meetings d any working with actors in the course of writing e any dramaturgical input. The ‘Production Schedule’ shall be in writing and incorporated into the form of engagement which is attached to this contract. B2ii The Writer shall deliver the first draft by the mutually agreed date. This date may be altered only by written mutual agreement between the Writer and the Manager. B2iii From the date of delivery of the first full draft the Manager shall have 6 weeks in which to discuss the Play with the Writer. Then: a If the Manager does not require rewrites then by the end of a further 3 weeks the Manager will inform the Writer in writing of the decision whether or not to produce. b If the Manager requires rewrites a time-scale for such rewrites will be agreed, subject to a maximum six-week period for such rewrites. Following delivery of the rewrites, the Manager shall have a further 3 weeks in which to decide whether to produce the play and shall inform the Writer of the decision in writing.
COMMISSIONING PROCESS. The implementation of the IOG may result in increased costs for quality improvement in the service. The NSSG will develop a business case for any additional funding required and this will be submitted to the Commissioners through the Local Delivery Planning process.
COMMISSIONING PROCESS. The Owner shall be responsible for the cost of the initial Cultural Heritage Report and any costs related to the proposed RFP (artist selection process) associated with the initial three-year period of the Term, provided that the Owner’s contribution to this portion of the process shall not exceed $5,000.00. Any excess costs above this cost cap, shall be the responsibility of the City.
COMMISSIONING PROCESS
