Criteria for Evaluations Clause Samples
The "Criteria for Evaluations" clause defines the standards and benchmarks that will be used to assess performance, deliverables, or compliance under an agreement. It typically outlines specific metrics, qualitative or quantitative measures, or procedural steps that must be met for a party’s work or product to be considered satisfactory. For example, it may require that services meet certain industry standards or that products pass designated quality tests. This clause ensures that both parties have a clear, objective basis for evaluating outcomes, thereby reducing ambiguity and potential disputes over whether contractual obligations have been fulfilled.
Criteria for Evaluations. 1. Faculty will be evaluated based on their classification and criteria defined in the Faculty Evaluation Plan (Percentage Form) (Appendix C) and the Faculty Evaluation Rubrics (Appendix B). Faculty will receive an evaluation of one (1) of the following: Satisfactory Strong Stellar Exceptional Needs Improvement
2. Evidence to verify work performance shall be compiled and presented in a portfolio format.
3. The Total Evaluation Score will be determined by applying the score for each section in the Faculty Evaluation Plan (Percentage Form) (Appendix C) to its respective percentage chosen by the faculty member and approved by the evaluator, totaled and entered.
4. Any adverse action received during the Annual Performance Appraisal/Evaluation Period will result in a reduction of one (1) level from the Total Evaluation (i.e., a level of Strong will be reduced to a level of Satisfactory).
Criteria for Evaluations. 1. Criteria for the Evaluation of Full-time Faculty
a. i. teaching effectiveness, including pedagogical experimentation, as exhibited in lectures, seminars, internships, independent studies and other instructional settings;
Criteria for Evaluations. 4.5.1. Peer and ▇▇▇▇ evaluations of classes or library orientation sessions will focus on these five criteria:
4.5.1.1. Classroom management, 4.5.1.2. Organization, 4.5.1.3. Student-faculty interactions
Criteria for Evaluations. 1. Criteria for the Evaluation of Full-time Faculty
i. teaching effectiveness, including pedagogical experimentation, as exhibited in lectures, seminars, internships, independent studies and other instructional settings;
ii. academic advising, as prescribed in Section A(3) of Article XII;
b. i. continuing scholarship, including
(A) contributions to the content of the discipline;
(B) participation in or contributions to professional societies and organizations;
(C) research as demonstrated by published or unpublished work (or, where applicable, artistic or other creative activities); and
(D) work toward the terminal degree or relevant post-graduate study. Nothing in this paragraph (b)(i) shall be deemed to require any member of the faculty to engage in all or in any particular one of the activities that constitute continuing scholarship; and no member of the bargaining unit shall be denied a personnel action by sole reason of his/her not having engaged in any one or another of such activities. In evaluating each member of the faculty it shall be the responsibility of those cha rged with doing so to assess the quality, significance and relevance of that faculty member’s continuing scholarship.
Criteria for Evaluations. (a) Adjunct faculty employees will be evaluated based upon three criteria: Teaching Performance and Effectiveness, Professional Activity, and Administrative Responsibilities. Details with respect to that criteria is set forth in "Appendix A." Each criterion will be weighted as follows:
(i) Teaching Performance and Effectiveness — 55 - 65%
(ii) Professional Activity — 25 - 35%
(iii) Administrative Responsibilities — 10%
(b) Each candidate shall determine the percentages within the range set forth in Section 16.13(a); the total for Teaching Performance and Effectiveness and Professional Activity must together equal 90%.
(c) The reviewer will use the Assessment Categories and Criteria Checklist (Appendix A) in formulating the final evaluation. A scale rating of 1 - 5 will be used for each assessment category as follows: 5 - Outstanding 4 - Meritorious
Criteria for Evaluations