Economic Evaluation. (1) Set out in Schedule “C” is the estimate of the costs of the Expansion Facilities including those costs attributable to engineering design, materials, labour, equipment and administrative activities and the Corporation’s economic evaluation with respect to the Expansion Facilities. The Developer acknowledges that the economic evaluation indicates that there will be a shortfall between the present value of the projected capital costs and ongoing maintenance costs for the Expansion Facilities and the present value of the projected revenue derived from the Expansion Facilities, which shortfall shall require a capital contribution from the Developer.
(2) The economic evaluation which the Corporation shall perform under Article 3.02
(1) of this Agreement shall identify the capital costs to be assumed by the Corporation in regard to the construction of the Expansion Facilities. The Corporation shall compensate the Developer for its share on a lot-by-lot basis at a rate of $• per lot as set out in Schedule “C” when the service for a lot is connected. Compensation will be paid monthly by the Corporation to the Developer following the date service is first connected to a lot on the Site Plan. The compensation payable by the Corporation will be for those lots connected up to the end of the five (5) year connection horizon provided in the economic evaluation. The Developer will not receive compensation for lots connected after the five (5) year connection horizon.
(3) The Corporation may, in its absolute discretion, adjust the per lot compensation payable to the Developer under Article 3.02
(2) if the lots are not connected for service at the rate predicted by the Developer or if there is a material change in the Site Plan.
Economic Evaluation. In addition to the criteria listed in ITB 38.2 (a) – (c) the following criteria shall apply.
Economic Evaluation. Item No. Installation Per Month -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Network Accesses -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zone A 34-Mbps ATM Access 2 units 4 400 000 Pts 1 510 072 Pts -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total network accesses 4 400 000 Pts 1 510 072 Pts -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Transfer rates for ISP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Transfer rate to IP Network-InfoVia Plus 1 Mbps 150 000 Pts 1 275 627 Pts Directo associated Transfer rate to Internet upon exit 1 Mbps 20 000 Pts [illegible] (leave Ibernet network) of 1 Mbps Transfer rate to Internet upon entry 1 Mbps 20 000 Pts [illegible] (entry to Ibernet network) of 1 Mbps -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total for ISP transfer rates 190 000 Pts 3 275 255 Pts -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Transfer rates for Portal -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Transfer rate to IP Network + InfoVia 1 Mbps 0 Pts 355 809 Pts associated anonymous accesses Transfer rate to Internet upon exit 1 Mbps 20 000 Xxx 000 000 Xxx (exit from Ibernet network) of 1 Mbps Transfer rate to Internet upon entry 1 Mbps 20 000 Xxx 000 000 Xxx (entry to Ibernet network) of 1 Mbps -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total for Portal transfer rates 40 000 Xxx 0 000 000 Xxx -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Network Node in customer's location -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Passport 50 AC Floor Mount Package 5 1 unit 686 984 Pts 46 973 Pts slot (Ref. TTD-M82) Redundant power supply (Ref. TTD-R02) 1 unit 0 Pts 7 681 Pts Redundant control processor (Ref. 1unit 0 Pts 34 270 Pts TTD-R01) Network access module E3 ATM 3 ports (Ref. TTD-M02) 2 units 0 Ptx 000 000 Xxx Xxxxx xxx XX xx (Ref. TTD-001) 1 unit 0 Pts 355 Pts PP 50 Management 1unit 0 Ptx 00 000 Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx xxxh PP 160 network node 1unit 0 Pts 343 492 Pts -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total for network nodes 686 000 Xxx 000 000 Xxx -------------------------------------------------------------------------------...
Economic Evaluation. The estimated cost of such Minimum Exploration Work Program is four million US Dollars (US $ 4,000,000).
Economic Evaluation. An investigation of the likely costs and operational problems of seismic acquisition, well drilling and other exploration operations. Potential costs of production and marketing of both oil and gas to be examined. The Risk-Return investment criteria of ongoing license operations and the fiscal, regulatory and operational criteria which can justify ongoing investment from the Western participants' point of view to be analyzed.
Economic Evaluation. Upon completion of the technical evaluation, the envelopes containing the financial offers for tenders that were not eliminated (i.e. those that were administratively compliant) are opened and all the originals of these financial offers are initialed by the chairperson and the secretary of the evaluation committee. The evaluation committee has to ensure that the financial offer satisfies all formal requirements.
Economic Evaluation. (1) Set out in Schedule “C” is the estimate of the costs of the Expansion Facilities and Connection Assets including those costs attributable to engineering design, materials, labour, equipment and administrative activities and the Corporation’s economic evaluation with respect to the Expansion Facilities and Connection Assets. The Developer acknowledges that the economic evaluation indicates that there will be a shortfall between the present value of the projected capital costs and ongoing maintenance costs for the Expansion Facilities and Connection Assets and the present value of the projected revenue derived from the Expansion Facilities and Connection Assets, which shortfall shall require a capital contribution from the Developer.
(2) The economic evaluation which the Corporation shall perform under Article 3.02
(1) of this Agreement shall identify the capital costs to be assumed by the Corporation in regard to the construction of the Expansion Facilities and Connection Assets. The Corporation shall compensate the Developer for its share on a lot-by-lot basis at a rate of $• per lot as set out in Schedule “C” when the service for a lot is connected. Compensation will be paid monthly by the Corporation to the Developer following the date service is first connected to a lot on the Plan. The compensation payable by the Corporation will be for those lots connected up to the end of the five (5) year connection horizon provided in the economic evaluation. The Developer will not receive compensation for lots connected after the five (5) year connection horizon.
(3) The Corporation may, in its absolute discretion, adjust the per lot compensation payable to the Developer under Article 3.02
(2) if the lots are not connected for service at the rate predicted by the Developer or if there is a material change in the Plan.
Economic Evaluation. To evaluate a Tender, the Procuring Entity shall consider the following:
a) the Tender price, excluding provisional sums and the provision, if any, for contingencies in the Price Schedules;
b) price adjustment due to discounts offered in accordance with ITT 17.11;
c) price adjustment due to quantifiable non material non-conformities in accordance with ITT 31.3;
d) converting the amount resulting from applying (a) to (c) above, if relevant, to a single currency in accordance with ITT 33; and
e) the evaluation factors specified in the TDS and in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.
Economic Evaluation. (1) Set out in Schedule “C” is the estimate of the costs of the Expansion Facilities and Connection Assets including those costs attributable to engineering design, materials, labour, equipment and administrative activities and the Corporation’s economic evaluation with respect to the Expansion Facilities and Connection Assets. The Developer acknowledges that the economic evaluation indicates that there will be a shortfall between the present value of the projected capital costs and ongoing maintenance costs for the Expansion Facilities and Connection Assets and the present value of the projected revenue derived from the Expansion Facilities and Connection Assets, which shortfall shall require a capital contribution from the Developer.
(2) The economic evaluation which the Corporation shall perform under Article 3.02
(1) of this Agreement shall identify the capital costs to be assumed by the Corporation in regard to the construction of the Expansion Facilities and Connection Assets. The Developer shall pay to the Corporation the Developer’s capital contribution under Article 3.02
(1) prior to the commencement of construction.
(3) The Corporation may, in its absolute discretion, adjust the capital contribution payable by the Developer under this Article 3 if the lots comprising the Plan are not connected for service at the rate assumed in the economic evaluation prepared by the Corporation under Article 3.02(1) or if there is a material change in the Plan.
Economic Evaluation. Lot 5 is focused on economic evaluation. Lot 5 will cover, but not be limited to: • Design, production, and population of econometric and statistical models • Value added analysis • Value for money analysis • Social return on investment • Cost benefit analysis • Cost-effectiveness analysis • Assessments of supply and demand. Suppliers bidding for Lot 5 would be expected to demonstrate significant expertise in one or more approaches to economic evaluation. Lot 6 is focused on strategy. Lot 6 will cover, but not be limited to: • Policy and Strategy reviews and development – including the exploration of areas for growth, improvement, and innovation • Sector analysis (in e.g. education) – including analysis of market conditions, barriers to entry, current players in the market, regulatory impact, current costs of delivery, challenges and opportunities • Rapid evidence reviews • Systematic reviews • Strategy evaluation – assessing whether a strategy is achieving its objectives or remains relevant over time in the context of policy, legislative, or other significant changes • Feasibility studies – incorporating an analysis of the benefits, disadvantages, costs, and risks of a current or planned service. This may include developing a Business Case. Below is some further information about the information requested in the PQQ Form, and how it will be assessed by GambleAware. The PQQ Form comprises five sections: • Section 1: Organisational Details • Section 2: Relevant Experience – Lot specific requirements • Section 3: Relevant Experience – Tender specific requirements • Section 4: References • Section 5: Declaration.
