We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Assessment Committee Sample Clauses

Assessment Committee. (a) Each Department or Faculty (in non-departmentalized faculties) intending to post courses for Contract Academic Instructor appointments shall establish a Contract Academic Instructor Assessment Committee. (b) This Committee shall normally be made up of the Chair or Xxxx, one (1) full-time faculty member and, where possible, one (1) Contract Academic Instructor holding a Multi-Year Appointment or a Right of First Refusal from the Department or Faculty. The Committee, with the exception of the Chair or Xxxx, shall be elected annually within the first two (2) weeks of the fall term. The Committee’s full-time member shall be elected by full-time members in the Faculty or Department. The Committee’s Contract Academic Instructor member shall be elected by Contract Academic Instructors in the Faculty or Department appointed to teach in the contract year. When there is a single candidate for either position, the candidate’s name shall be submitted to a confidential yes/no vote by members of the relevant electorate. Except where there is a majority negative vote, the candidate shall be deemed to be elected. When elections are completed, the Chair or Xxxx shall communicate the names of the Committee members to all persons teaching in the academic unit. (c) Instructors of Interdisciplinary courses (i.e. those not affiliated with a particular faculty or department) that are part of interdisciplinary programs that span academic units will be subject to separate assessment committees. Such a Committee shall normally be made up of the Program Director or Coordinator, one (1) full-time faculty member and, where possible, one (1) Contract Academic Instructor holding a Multi-Year Appointment or a Right of First Refusal from the Interdisciplinary Program. The Committee, with the exception of the Director or Coordinator, shall be elected annually within the first two (2) weeks of the fall term by full-time and part-time members of the Interdisciplinary program following the procedures outline above in paragraph (b). (d) The Contract Academic Instructor Assessment Committee shall consider all applications for Contract Academic Instructor appointments. As part of this process, the Contract Academic Instructor Assessment Committee shall invite and take into consideration comments from all full-time faculty and instructors and from Contract Academic Instructors holding Multi-Year Appointments. (e) The Contract Academic Instructor Assessment Committee shall ensure a fair appoin...
Assessment Committee. ‌ The parties agree to have a committee to study the evaluation system for paraprofessionals and to recommend improvements. MEA will appoint 6 (six) representatives to the committee from the bargaining units represented by MEA. The Superintendent will appoint six (6) representatives from management to the committee. Until such time as changes and/or new forms are adopted by the parties, the current system and forms shall be used. Section 1 - Paid Leaves:‌‌‌
Assessment Committee. The following nurses have allowed their names to stand as Chairpersons - Nursing Assessment Committees - in the above named sector:
Assessment Committee a. General Statement of Purpose: The Assessment Committee works collaboratively with the Chief Academic Officer and Xxxxx to support assessment efforts across the curriculum, to review the results of assessment activities, and to recommend quality improvements related to academic assessment and student learning.
Assessment Committee. 1. Each school year, the District and the Association will assemble an Assessment Committee. The purpose of this committee is to serve shared interests in conforming to law where applicable, engaging students in meaningful, relevant assessments, limiting infringement on instructional time, and ensuring that assessments provide important summative and formative value for teachers, families and district leadership. 2. The Association and the District will each be allowed to appoint up to five (5) members of the Assessment Committee. 3. Annually, the District will share an assessment calendar with the committee. This will occur no later than October
Assessment Committee. The Chair of the Department shall appoint a minimum of three (3) department faculty of varying ranks to serve on the Assessment committee. The Assessment committee is responsible for reviewing and program assessment data to determine if the program is consistent with the department’s mission, goals, and objectives. Assessments are also utilized to make sure the program is in compliance with state and University accreditation standards.
Assessment Committee. The application will only be assessed by a committee comprising at least two people that has been appointed for this purpose by the employer. The tasks of this committee are to assess the applications, to determine the reimbursement amounts and to ensure payment of the reimbursement amounts. The committee will deal with all the details concerning the applications and medical treatment in strict confidentiality. The committee will announce its decisions to the applicants in writing by the month of May at the latest. Correspondence about the committee’s decisions may not be entered into.
Assessment Committee. The Master Officer Program will be overseen by an Assessment Committee comprised of a Program Director, a Lieutenant, and two (2) UNION members. The Chief of Police will appoint the Program Director and the Lieutenant, while the Executive Committee of the UNION will appoint two (2) of its members to the Assessment Committee. The Assessment Committee will oversee and coordinate the content, scheduling and administration of all phases of the program and to rule on questions of clarity, including the validation of Technical services to the department and services to the community. The Committee's interpretation and application of Article 27 shall be final except where there is a tie vote and then the Chief shall make the final decision.
Assessment Committee. 1. In order to ensure proper follow-up of the cooperation, the Assessment Committee shall be set up to monitor the implementation of this Cooperation Agreement and discuss new cooperation plans. 2. The Assessment Committee shall be composed of representatives of each Party. The list of members for each Party shall be communicated through diplomatic channels after the entry into force of this Cooperation Agreement. 3. The Committee shall prepare annual reports and set out future projects and orientations. 4. The Committee shall meet at least once a year at the initiative of either of the Parties.
Assessment Committee. 10.1 The assessment committee shall be appointed by SDU and shall be composed of three (3) members who shall be recognized researchers within the relevant field of which two (2) shall be external (meaning they shall not be employed with SDU or X). SDU appoints one of the members as chairman and the chairman must be employed at SDU. 10.2 None of the supervisors can be members of the assessment committee, but the principal supervisor at SDU and the main supervisor at X will assist the assessment committee without voting rights. 10.3 The PhD Candidate must be informed of the composition of the assessment committee. The PhD Candidate can object to the appointment of the individual members of the assessment committee within a week of being notified of the composition. 10.4 No later than two (2) months after the submission of the PhD thesis and two (2) weeks before the PhD defence, the assessment committee must submit to SDU a written recommendation stating whether the PhD thesis is suitable for defence or not. SDU will send a copy of the recommendation to X. 10.5 In the event the assessment committee deems the PhD thesis not suitable for defence, the assessment committee in its recommendation will state whether the PhD thesis can be submitted again in a revised edition within a certain timeframe. The PhD Candidate and the principal supervisor shall have an opportunity to comment on the assessment committee’s recommendation. 10.6 In the event the assessment committee deems the PhD thesis not suitable for defence SDU must make one of the following decisions based on the assessment committee’s recommendation and the PhD student’s and the principal supervisor’s comments, if any: 1) that the defence of the thesis may not take place 2) that the PhD thesis may be resubmitted in a revised version within a deadline of at least three months. If the PhD thesis is resubmitted it must be assessed by the same assessment committee unless special circumstances apply. 3) that the PhD thesis must be submitted for assessment by a new assessment committee. SDU will send a copy of the decision to X.