Five Year Evaluation Cycle Sample Clauses

Five Year Evaluation Cycle. 10.3.1 Evaluation every five years: By mutual agreement of the Evaluator and the unit member to be evaluated, the unit member shall be evaluated at least once every five (5) years providing all of the following conditions apply:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. Permanent teachers who have been employed by the District for at least ten (10) consecutive years as a teacher who are considered “highly qualified” pursuant to the regulations under “No Child Left Behind” (20 U.S.C. 7801, et. seq.) and whose most recent evaluation ratings have been satisfactory may be evaluated every five (5) years, provided the teacher and his/her primary evaluator consent. At any time, the teacher or the evaluator may withdraw consent returning to the “every two (2) years” cycle. Written notice, as set forth in Appendix E (Return to Evaluation Cycle and/or Referral to Peer Assistance and Review Program) shall be provided to the employee. The withdrawal of consent shall not be subject to the grievance /arbitration procedure.
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. (*This piece of language has no sunset date) A bargaining unit member and his/her evaluator may mutually agree to a five-year evaluation cycle if the following conditions are met. The bargaining unit member:  has permanent status;  has been employed by the school District for at least 10 years or an employee with the District for 8 years with a minimum of 12 years credentialed teaching experience;  meets the federal definition of highly qualified (if those employees occupy positions that are required to be filled by a highly qualified professional by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301, et seq.], as defined in 20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801) and meets all state credentialing and certification requirements; and  has met or exceeded standards in the previous evaluation or has successfully completed an alternative evaluation project. The unit member or administrator may opt out of this evaluation option at any time.  This five-year cycle will be evaluated for effectiveness by the District and the Association at the conclusion of the 2007-2008 school year.
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. Qualification for this cycle requires permanent status, completion of at least 10 years in the district, being currently rated highly qualified as defined in federal law (20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801), having previous evaluations rated as meeting or exceeding standards, and the agreement of the evaluator and the certificated employee (which can be withdrawn during the five year evaluation cycle). It is intended that participation in the five year evaluation cycle will be established and maintained as provided for in the Education Code (the terms of which have been summarized above).
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. 14.3.11.1 For the purpose of Article 14, and per Education Code 44664 (a), a permanent unit member shall be eligible for the five year evaluation cycle if the unit member has the consent of the unit member’s evaluator and meets the following criteria: ● Has been employed at least 10 consecutive years with the District, and ● is highly qualified as defined in 20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801, and ● has earned a satisfactory rating on the unit member’s most recent evaluation, and has obtained the signed, eligibility form described in Section 14.3.11.2
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. (*This piece of language has no sunset date) A bargaining unit member and his/her evaluator may mutually agree to a five-year evaluation cycle if the following conditions are met. The bargaining unit member: • has permanent status; • has been employed by the school District for at least 10 years or an employee with the District for 8 years with a minimum of 12 years credentialed teaching experience; • meets the federal definition of highly qualified (if those employees occupy positions that are required to be filled by a highly qualified professional by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301, et seq.], as defined in 20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801) and meets all state credentialing and
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. Permanent classified employees who have been employed by the District for at least (5) consecutive years as a classified employee and whose most recent evaluation ratings have been satisfactory may be evaluated every five (5) years, provided the classified employee and his/her primary evaluator consent. A written notice returning an employee to the evaluation cycle shall be provided within the first sixty (60) days of the employee’s work year. If an employee elects to return to the evaluation cycle, they must notify the evaluator of this request within the first sixty (60) days of the employee’s work year. The withdrawal of consent shall not be subject to the grievance/arbitration procedure.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. 1. A Unit Member may maintain a 2-year evaluation cycle (traditional or alternative) or choose to participate in a 5-year cycle. In order to participate in the 5-year cycle, the Unit Member must have met standards in all areas evaluated the year prior and completed at least ten (10) years in the District at the date of the Unit Member’s last summative.

Related to Five Year Evaluation Cycle

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!