Five Year Evaluation Cycle Sample Clauses

Five Year Evaluation Cycle. 10.3.1 Evaluation every five years: By mutual agreement of the Evaluator and the unit member to be evaluated, the unit member shall be evaluated at least once every five (5) years providing all of the following conditions apply: a. The unit member has achieved permanent status; b. The unit member has been employed by the District for ten (10) years; c. The unit member’s immediate prior evaluation was deemed satisfactory as defined in the Article 10.6.3; and d. The unit member has been determined to be highly qualified as defined in the ESEA 20 USC Section 7801. 10.3.2 Mutual agreement may be withdrawn by either the Evaluator or the unit member.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. Permanent teachers who have been employed by the District for at least ten (10) consecutive years as a teacher who are considered “highly qualified” pursuant to the regulations under “No Child Left Behind” (20 U.S.C. 7801, et. seq.) and whose most recent evaluation ratings have been satisfactory may be evaluated every five (5) years, provided the teacher and his/her primary evaluator consent. At any time, the teacher or the evaluator may withdraw consent returning to the “every two (2) years” cycle. Written notice, as set forth in Appendix E (Return to Evaluation Cycle and/or Referral to Peer Assistance and Review Program) shall be provided to the employee. The withdrawal of consent shall not be subject to the grievance /arbitration procedure.
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. Qualification for this cycle requires permanent status, completion of at least 10 years in the district, being currently rated highly qualified as defined in federal law (20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801), having previous evaluations rated as meeting or exceeding standards, and the agreement of the evaluator and the certificated employee (which can be withdrawn during the five year evaluation cycle). It is intended that participation in the five year evaluation cycle will be established and maintained as provided for in the Education Code (the terms of which have been summarized above).
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. (*This piece of language has no sunset date) A bargaining unit member and his/her evaluator may mutually agree to a five-year evaluation cycle if the following conditions are met. The bargaining unit member: • has permanent status; • has been employed by the school District for at least 10 years or an employee with the District for 8 years with a minimum of 12 years credentialed teaching experience; • meets the federal definition of highly qualified (if those employees occupy positions that are required to be filled by a highly qualified professional by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301, et seq.], as defined in 20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801) and meets all state credentialing and certification requirements; and • has met or exceeded standards in the previous evaluation or has successfully completed an alternative evaluation project. The unit member or administrator may opt out of this evaluation option at any time. • This five-year cycle will be evaluated for effectiveness by the District and the Association at the conclusion of the 2007-2008 school year.
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. 14.3.11.1 For the purpose of Article 14, and per Education Code 44664 (a), a permanent unit member shall be eligible for the five year evaluation cycle if the unit member has the consent of the unit member’s evaluator and meets the following criteria: ● Has been employed at least 10 consecutive years with the District, and ● is highly qualified as defined in 20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801, and ● has earned a satisfactory rating on the unit member’s most recent evaluation, and has obtained the signed, eligibility form described in Section 14.3.11.2
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. 1. A Unit Member may maintain a 2-year evaluation cycle (traditional or alternative) or choose to participate in a 5-year cycle. In order to participate in the 5-year cycle, the Unit Member must have met standards in all areas evaluated the year prior and completed at least ten (10) years in the District at the date of the Unit Member’s last summative. 2. If a Unit Member elects to participate in a 5-year evaluation cycle, the Unit Member will be required to participate in annual staff development of his/her choice, for example but not limited to: a. Individual/Group Book Studies b. PENS visit c. In-house training opportunities d. Outside District conferences 3. Staff development will be monitored by the Unit Member. Activities shall be completed by the end of the school year to apply to that year. The Unit Member will provide documentation of staff development upon request. Any staff development activities that occur over the summer shall be applicable to the following year. If the Unit Member does not complete the annual staff development component, the Unit Member will return to the 2-year evaluation cycle.
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. Permanent classified employees who have been employed by the District for at least (5) consecutive years as a classified employee and whose most recent evaluation ratings have been satisfactory may be evaluated every five (5) years, provided the classified employee and his/her primary evaluator consent. A written notice returning an employee to the evaluation cycle shall be provided within the first sixty (60) days of the employee’s work year. If an employee elects to return to the evaluation cycle, they must notify the evaluator of this request within the first sixty (60) days of the employee’s work year. The withdrawal of consent shall not be subject to the grievance/arbitration procedure.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Five Year Evaluation Cycle. (*This piece of language has no sunset date) A bargaining unit member and his/her evaluator may mutually agree to a five-year evaluation cycle if the following conditions are met. The bargaining unit member: • has permanent status; • has been employed by the school District for at least 10 years or an employee with the District for 8 years with a minimum of 12 years credentialed teaching experience; • meets the federal definition of highly qualified (if those employees occupy positions that are required to be filled by a highly qualified professional by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301, et seq.], as defined in 20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801) and meets all state credentialing and

Related to Five Year Evaluation Cycle

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Adjustment of Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target Distribution Levels (a) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution, Third Target Distribution, Common Unit Arrearages and Cumulative Common Unit Arrearages shall be proportionately adjusted in the event of any distribution, combination or subdivision (whether effected by a distribution payable in Units or otherwise) of Units or other Partnership Securities in accordance with Section 5.10. In the event of a distribution of Available Cash that is deemed to be from Capital Surplus, the then applicable Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, shall be adjusted proportionately downward to equal the product obtained by multiplying the otherwise applicable Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, as the case may be, by a fraction of which the numerator is the Unrecovered Capital of the Common Units immediately after giving effect to such distribution and of which the denominator is the Unrecovered Capital of the Common Units immediately prior to giving effect to such distribution. (b) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, shall also be subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 6.9.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Payment and Year-End Adjustment Amounts accrued pursuant to this Agreement shall be payable to the Adviser as of the last day of each month. If necessary, on or before the last day of the first month of each fiscal year, an adjustment payment shall be made by the appropriate party in order that the actual Fund Operating Expenses of a Fund for the prior fiscal year (including any reimbursement payments hereunder with respect to such fiscal year) do not exceed the Maximum Annual Operating Expense Limit.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • End of Fiscal Years; Fiscal Quarters The Borrower will cause (i) its and each of its Domestic Subsidiaries’ fiscal years to end on December 31 of each calendar year and (ii) its and each of its Domestic Subsidiaries’ fiscal quarters to end on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each calendar year.

  • Calendar Year Calendar Year" for the purposes of this Agreement shall mean the twelve (12) month period from January 1st to December 31st, inclusive.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!