Government Policy. The Service Provider will ensure compliance with the relevant regulatory and legislative obligations as may be amended from time to time and comply with any such revisions to the Prison Rules or instructions as the Purchaser may make. The Service Provider shall, where appropriate or requested, satisfy the Purchaser that the necessary action(s) or revisions to Operational Instructions or procedures have been enacted to maintain the necessary legal and regulatory compliance.
Government Policy. If any obligations relating to State government procurement policies are specified in the Agreement, then those obligations form part of the Agreement and the Agent must comply with them.
Government Policy. (1) Federal agencies providing disaster assistance under the Act or under their own au- thorities triggered by the Act, shall co- operate to prevent and rectify duplica- tion of benefits, according to the gen- eral policy guidance of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The
Government Policy. In event of any Government policies, which may affect the smooth running of real estate business and business generally, not limited to, Pandemic Lockdown, Fiscal Policy, Tax Policy, a formal notice would be written to the Investor by the Real Estate Development Company stating such policy and the inability to Pay any Return on Investment (ROI) for the Month(s) stated therein.
Government Policy a. National Policy on Resettlement and Rehabilitation for Project Affected Persons, (Ministry of Rural Development), 2003
Government Policy. The Scottish Ministers will consult the SCTS on all policy and legislative proposals which the Scottish Government is developing that may have an operational impact on those areas for which the SCTS is responsible. Scottish Ministers will consult the SCTS in reasonable time to allow the SCTS to make representations and for those representations to be fully considered before final decisions are taken and publicised.
Government Policy. In a largely publicly-funded sector, policy-making across a wide range of issues and themes is a major driver of change for employers and their workforce. Some of the main policy drivers and associated initiatives of the time were reviewed in the ‘Market assessment’ (LLUK, 2004). This chapter brings this earlier review up- to-date, considering the plethora of recent policy developments affecting the sector as a whole and within Scotland. Scotland has a distinct and separate education and training system from the rest of the UK. This has resulted in additional and considerable variations in the development and implementation of policy on common themes. The chapter begins by considering policies influencing the UK as a whole and Scotland in particular; taking into account ways in which these policies are also shaped by European agreements and initiatives.
Government Policy. 1.6.1 The Service Provider shall comply with the Authority‟s Operating Standards current on the day, which clarify and codify in a single document standards, distilled from Prison Rules, various Management Manuals and Instructions to Governors. The Authority will be responsible for deciding the extent to which policy and procedural developments apply to the Prisoner escort and court custody arrangements. The Service Provider shall comply with any such policy and procedural instructions as the Authority may notify and shall satisfy the Escort Monitor that the necessary action(s) have been taken within the required time period notified to the Service Provider.
Government Policy. In a largely publicly-funded sector, policy making across a wide range of issues and themes is a major driver of change for employers and their workforce. Some of the main policy drivers and associated initiatives of the time were reviewed in the ‘Market assessment’ (LLUK, 2004). This chapter brings this earlier review up- to-date, considering the plethora of recent policy developments affecting the sector and its component constituencies within the UK. It begins by considering policies influencing the UK as a whole and takes into account ways in which UK-wide policies are also shaped by European agreements and initiatives. The education system in Scotland has been separate from that in the remainder of the UK for many years. Also, in 1998 powers for education and training were devolved to the National Assembly for Wales, and powers for education, learning and employment were devolved to the Northern Ireland Assembly. This has resulted in additional and considerable variations in the development and implementation of policy on common themes across the four home countries of the UK. In order to address this, each UK home country is also considered in turn, with the intention of summarising the main features of relevant policy development in that country. Additional information in relation to individual policies within individual UK home countries is presented in Annexes D–G, and specific reference to these is made within the text where relevant.
Government Policy. The policy requirement was articulated most forcefully by the Justice tribunal with reference to peacetime crimes against humanity: As we construe it, [Article II(1)(c)] provides for punishment of crimes committed against German nationals only where there is proof of conscious participation in systematic government organized or approved procedures amounting to atrocities and offenses of the kind specified in the act and committed against populations or amounting to persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds.66 That requirement followed naturally from the Tribunal‟s insistence that the Nazis‟ pre-war atrocities and persecutions violated international law even though they were not connected to war crimes or crimes against peace. Such acts violated international law precisely because they were the product of government policy. In the words of the Tribunal, “governmental participation is a material element of the crime against humanity” because “[o]nly when official organs of sovereignty participated in atrocities and persecutions did those crimes assume international proportions.”67 The Einsatzgruppen tribunal also viewed the policy requirement as a substitute for the nexus requirement. Although it concluded that Article II(1)(c) was not “limited to offenses committed during war,” it insisted that such peacetime offenses violated international law only if the Nazi regime had been in some sense responsible for their commission: Crimes against humanity are acts committed in the course of wholesale and systematic violation of life and liberty. It is to be observed that insofar as international jurisdiction is concerned, the concept of crimes against humanity does not apply to offenses for which the criminal code of any well-ordered state makes adequate provision. They can only come within the purview of this basic code of humanity because the state involved, owing to indifference, 65 Ministries, XIV TWC 557. 66 Justice, III TWC 982. 67 Id. at 984. impotency or complicity, has been unable or has refused to halt the crimes and punish the criminals.68 As the quotes indicate, the Einsatzgruppen tribunal took a slightly broader approach to the policy requirement than the Justice tribunal. The latter held that the requirement was satisfied as long as the crimes in question were “government organized or approved.” The former, by contrast, held that the requirement was satisfied by government “indifference, impotence, or complicity.” The Einsatzgruppen trib...
