INTERNAL REVIEW PROCEDURE Sample Clauses

INTERNAL REVIEW PROCEDURE. Section 7.1 Scope All complaints against the Xxxxxx Police Department or its employees shall be investigated.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INTERNAL REVIEW PROCEDURE. Section 7.1 Scope All complaints against the Xxxxxx Police Department or its employees shall be investigated. Section 7.2 Notification At any time an inquiry concerning a member occurs when the Employer believes that disciplinary action of record will or may result, the employee will be notified when first questioned, that such result is possible. Prior to any questioning, a member shall be informed of the nature of the investigation (whether disciplinary or criminal) and shall be provided written notice of the allegations made against the member. The member shall be informed of the member’s rights and responsibilities relative to the investigation, in advance of any questions. Section 7.3 Right to Representation During all questioning, the member may upon request, be accompanied by a representative of the FOP/OLC. If a member desires, the member shall be given a reasonable opportunity to consult with such representative before being required to answer questions. Employees may waive the right to FOP/OLC representation by signing the appropriate FOP/OLC forms. Section 7.4 Interviews Any questioning, or interviewing, of a member will be conducted at hours reasonably related to their shift, preferably during, or immediately before or after, the member’s working hours. Such sessions shall be for reasonable periods of time, and time shall be allowed during such questioning for rest periods and for a member’s attendance to other physical necessities. Section 7.5 Responsibility to Respond Before a member may be charged with insubordination or like offense for refusing to answer questions or participate in any investigation, the member shall be advised that such conduct, if continued, may be the basis for such a charge.
INTERNAL REVIEW PROCEDURE. IAAME will maintain procedures that have been approved by the Department and use these procedures to determine whether to terminate adverse actions against an accredited agency or approved person on the grounds that the deficiencies necessitating the adverse action have been corrected.
INTERNAL REVIEW PROCEDURE. COA will maintain procedures that have been approved by the Department and use these procedures to determine whether to terminate adverse actions against an accredited agency or approved person on the grounds that the deficiencies necessitating the adverse action have been corrected.
INTERNAL REVIEW PROCEDURE. (1) The Administrator must establish an Internal Review procedure to deal with complaints relating to— (a) any decision of the Administrator to decline an application for assistance; (b) any decision of the Administrator not to proceed to determine such an application unless the applicant takes further steps; (c) any determination of the Administrator that the applicant (or, as the case may be, the person on whose behalf the application was made) is not an eligible person; (d) any determination of the Administrator that an eligible person is not entitled to free assistance; (e) any determination of the Administrator as to the types of assistance which an eligible person will be offered; (f) any decision of the Administrator in relation to the provision of assistance by the Administrator, including in respect of the reliability of the equipment supplied by the Administrator; and (g) any decision of the Administrator about the standard of service provided by the Administrator under this Scheme. (2) The internal review procedure must include provisions to the effect of those set out in paragraphs (3) to (5). (3) A person making such a complaint (“the complainant”) must request an Internal Review within— (a) 28 days of the date on which the Administrator sends a notification under clause 14(4); (b) 28 days of the cause of complaint arising in paragraph (1)(f) or (1)(g); or (c) within the warranty period for the equipment, where the complaint relates to the reliability of the equipment supplied. (4) The Administrator may extend the time limit mentioned in paragraph (3) for a complainant to request an Internal Review. (5) As part of the Internal Review procedure the Administrator must— (a) take into account any relevant new evidence supplied by the complainant or any other person; (b) notify the complainant of the outcome of the Internal Review within a reasonable time; (c) notify the complainant of the matters specified in clause 15(1)(a) to (c) if relevant to the outcome of the Internal Review; and (d) notify the complainant of any further action the Administrator will take, or assistance which will be provided, as a consequence of the Internal Review.
INTERNAL REVIEW PROCEDURE. Section 8.1. All internal investigations will be conducted in accordance with this Article and written policy established by the Employer. The Employer agrees to meet with representatives of the Union to discuss any contemplated changes in the policy. Section 8.2. It is understood by the parties that the minimum requirements specified in Section 8.3 of this Article do not extend to day-to-day communication which occurs between a supervisor and an employee, including but not limited to, the following occurrences: performance evaluations; training; counseling sessions; work-related instructions; meetings; inquiries; or the furnishing of reports concerned with the initial investigation of an incident which does not involve the conduct of a formal internal affairs investigation at that point in time. However, when a supervisor or investigator has determined that an internal investigation interview of an employee is warranted due to allegations made against the employee, the employee shall be notified in writing that he/she is subject to such an investigation interview. A. Reasonably in advance of an investigation interview, written notification stating the charges made against an employee will be given to the employee. The employee will be provided a copy of the written charge. In addition, the employee will be notified at that time whether the charges are criminal or administrative in nature. B. Investigation interviews shall be scheduled so that the employee has a reasonable opportunity, not to exceed forty-eight (48) hours, to obtain a representative who shall be permitted, at the request of the employee, to be present during the investigation interview. Written notification is to be provided at the beginning of the investigation interview as to the specific allegations which support the charge. C. When an anonymous complaint is made against an employee and no corroborative evidence is obtained after an inquiry or investigation, the complaint shall be classified as unfounded. However, if three (3) or more anonymous complaints of a non-criminal nature are received within a twelve (12) month period or three (3) or more anonymous complaints of a criminal nature are received within a twenty-four (24) month period, then the anonymous complaint(s) may be classified as other than unfounded. D. No employee under investigation or called as a witness shall be charged with insubordination for failing to answer questions at an investigation interview unless the employe...
INTERNAL REVIEW PROCEDURE 
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to INTERNAL REVIEW PROCEDURE

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Review Procedures a. In consultation with the Illinois SHPO, NRCS shall identify those undertakings with little to no potential to affect historic properties and list those undertakings in Appendix A. Upon the determination by the CRS that a proposed undertaking is included in Appendix A, the NRCS is not required to consult further with the SHPO for that undertaking. A list of undertakings with the potential to affect historic properties comprises Appendix B. b. The lists of undertakings provided in Appendices A and B may be modified through consultation and written agreement between the NRCS State Conservationist and the SHPO without requiring an amendment to this Illinois Prototype Agreement. The NRCS State Office will maintain the master list and will provide an updated list to all consulting parties with an explanation of the rationale for classifying the practices accordingly. c. Undertakings identified in Appendix B shall require further review as outlined in Stipulation V. a. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO to define the undertaking’s APE, identify and evaluate historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking, assess potential effects, and identify strategies for resolving adverse effects prior to implementing the undertaking. 1) NRCS may provide its proposed APE, identification of historic properties and/or scope of identification efforts, and assessment of effects in a single transmittal to the SHPO, provided this documentation meets the substantive standards in 36 CFR Part 800.4-5 and 800.11. 2) The NRCS shall attempt to avoid adverse effects to historic properties whenever possible; where historic properties are located in the APE, NRCS shall describe how it proposes to modify, buffer, or move the undertaking to avoid adverse effects to historic properties. 3) Where the NRCS proposes a finding of "no historic properties affected" or "no adverse effect" to historic properties, the SHPO shall have 30 calendar days from receipt of this documented description and information to review it and provide comments. The NRCS shall take into account all timely comments. i. If the SHPO, or another consulting party, disagrees with NRCS' findings and/or determination, it shall notify the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar daytime period. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO or other consulting party to attempt to resolve the disagreement. If the disagreement cannot be resolved through this consultation, NRCS shall follow the dispute resolution process in Stipulation VIII below. ii. If the SHPO does not respond to the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar day period and/or the NRCS receives no objections from other consulting parties, or if the SHPO concurs with the NRCS' determination and proposed actions to avoid adverse effects, the NRCS shall document the concurrence/lack of response within the review time noted above and may move forward with the undertaking. 4) Where a proposed undertaking may adversely affect historic properties, NRCS shall describe proposed measures to minimize or mitigate the adverse effects, and follow the process in 36 CFR Part 800.6, including consultation with other consulting patties and notification to the ACHP, to develop a Memorandum of Agreement to resolve the adverse effects. Should the proposed undertaking have the potential to adversely affect a known NHL, the NRCS shall, to the maximum extent possible, undertake such planning and actions that may be necessary to minimize harm to the NHL in accordance with 54 U.S.C. § 306107 of the NHPA and 36 CFR Part 800.6 and 800.10, including consultation with the ACHP and respective National Park Service, Regional National Historic Landmark Program Coordinator, to develop a Memorandum of Agreement. d. NRCS will conduct archaeological surveys and will submit reports and other documentation to SHPO for review and comment. When no archaeological sites have been located by the archaeological survey, NRCS may proceed with the proposed undertaking. Reports for negative surveys must be submitted to SHPO on a quarterly basis. All positive and negative reports submitted to SHPO will be sent digitally for submission to the Inventory of Illinois Archaeological Sites (IAS) data file maintained by staff at the Illinois State Museum (ISM) housed under the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). The NRCS further agrees that access to specific site location data will be restricted to the CRS, the NRCS field personnel installing conservation practices adjacent to the cultural resource, and the landowner. Specific site location information for individual projects will be maintained in a secure cultural resources file kept in the field offices and will not be available to the public. e. Curation: NRCS personnel will not collect artifactual material during routine field inspections. However, if a professional survey, evaluation testing, or mitigation is required, NRCS shall ensure that all materials and records resulting from cultural resources surveys or data recovery activities on federal or state property are curated by the Illinois State Museum. The NRCS shall ensure that all records resulting from cultural resource surveys or data recovery activities on private property are curated by the Illinois State Museum or an equivalent curation facility in accordance with 36 CFR Part 79. Subject to the landowner's permission, all objects resulting from cultural resources surveys or data recovery activities are maintained by the Illinois State Museum or equivalent research institution until their analysis is complete and they are returned to their owner(s). Although landowners will be encouraged to donate artifactual material, it is understood that objects collected on private land remain the property of the landowner(s) unless the landowner(s) donates the material to the Illinois State Museum or equivalent research institution. This excludes burial goods, as stipulated by XXXXXX.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement which conform with and provide specificity to the statutory obligations established by Ohio Rev. Code § 3319.111 and § 3319.112.

  • Claims and Review Procedure In the event that any claim for benefits that must initially be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors, is denied (in whole or in part) hereunder, the claimant shall receive from First Charter a notice of denial in writing within 60 days, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for denial, with specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Supplemental Agreement. Any disagreements about such interpretations and construction shall be submitted to an arbitrator subject to the rules and procedures established by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator shall be acceptable to both First Charter and the Executive (or Beneficiary); if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator, the disagreement shall be heard by a panel of three arbitrators, with each party to appoint one arbitrator and the third to be chosen by the other two. No member of the Board of Directors shall be liable to any person for any action taken under Article VIII except those actions undertaken with lack of good faith.

  • Complaints Procedure (a) A formal complaint must be submitted in writing within six months of the last alleged occurrence. (b) A complaint must be submitted through the Union and/or directly to the Executive Director (or the equivalent or designate). When the Executive Director has received a complaint, they will notify the respondent and the union staff representative of the substance of the complaint in writing within 15 days. (c) The complaint must contain the specific instance(s) and date(s) that the alleged harassment occurred, the names of any witnesses, an explanation of how the action constitutes a violation of Article 29 (Harassment), and the remedy sought. (d) The Executive Director or their designate will investigate the complaint and will complete their report in writing within 30 days. (e) The Employer will take action to resolve the complaint within 10 days of receiving the investigator's report. (f) The Employer will advise the respondent, the complainant and the Union in writing of the substance of the investigator's report and the resolution of the complaint. (g) If the resolution involves separating employees, reasonable efforts will be made to relocate or reschedule the respondent. The complainant may agree in writing to be transferred or rescheduled. (h) If the resolution involves separating an employee and a respondent who is not an employee, reasonable efforts will be made to remedy the situation. (i) If the respondent is the Executive Director (or equivalent), or where there are possible systemic issues or multiple complaints, the following process will be used: (1) The complainant will contact the Union. (2) As soon as possible but within 30 days the Union will notify the Executive Director (or equivalent) and CSSEA. Clause 29.4 (a) and (c) apply to the notice. CSSEA will inform the Employer's Board of Directors. (3) CSSEA and the Union will appoint either Xxxxx Xxxxx or Xxxxxx Xxxx to resolve the complaint. (The person appointed is referred to below as "the Appointee".) (4) After consultation with the parties involved, the Appointee will establish the process to resolve the complaint. The process may include - at the Appointee's discretion - any of the following (or any combination of them): fact-finding, mediation, making recommendations or a full report, or conducting an expedited arbitration. In exercising their discretion with respect to the process, the Appointee will consider the parties' desire that the process be fair and expeditious, that it minimizes disruption in the workplace, that it respects individual privacy to the degree possible in the circumstances, and that it keeps costs to a reasonable level. The Appointee will submit any report or recommendations to CSSEA and the Union. The report and recommendations will remain confidential, except for distribution to the Employer's Board of Directors, the complainant and the respondent. The Appointee may stipulate conditions she/he deems appropriate with respect to distribution. Any outcomes of the process are without prejudice or precedent for other proceedings. (5) The Appointee's fees and expenses will be shared by the Employer and the Union. (j) The Employer may take appropriate action, including discipline, against a complainant if the investigation determines that the complaint is frivolous, vindictive or vexatious.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claims and Review Procedures 6.1 For all claims other than Disability benefits:

  • New Procedures New procedures as to who shall provide certain of these services in Section 1 may be established in writing from time to time by agreement between the Fund and the Transfer Agent. The Transfer Agent may at times perform only a portion of these services and the Fund or its agent may perform these services on the Fund's behalf;

  • GRIEVANCE ARBITRATION PROCEDURE 8.01 For purposes of this Agreement, a grievance is defined as a difference arising between the parties relating to the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of the Agreement, including any question as to whether a matter is arbitrable. 8.02 In all steps of this Grievance Procedure, the aggrieved nurse, if desired, may be accompanied by or represented by a nurse representative. 8.03 It is the mutual desire of the parties hereto that complaints of the nurses shall be adjusted as quickly as possible, and it is understood that a nurse has no grievance until she has first given the Unit Manager the opportunity of adjusting her complaint. Such complaint shall be discussed with the Unit Manager within ten (10) days after the circumstances giving rise to it have occurred or ought reasonably to have come to the attention of the nurse and failing settlement within five (5) days, it shall then be taken up as a grievance within ten (10) days following the Unit Manager's decision in the following manner and sequence: The nurse may submit a written grievance on the form set out in Appendix "A", signed by her, to the Unit Manager. The grievance shall identify the nature of the grievance and the remedy sought and should identify the provisions of the Agreement which are alleged to be violated. The Unit Manager will deliver her decision in writing within five (5) days of the submission of the grievance. Failing settlement, then: Within five (5) days following the decision in Step No. 1, the nurse may submit the written grievance to the Director of Resident Care who will deliver her decision, in writing, within five (5) days from the date on which the written grievance was presented to her. The parties may, if they so desire, meet to discuss the grievance at a time and place suitable to both parties. Failing settlement, then: Within ten (10) days of receiving the decision under Step 2, the grievance, in writing, may be referred to the Chief Executive Officer who shall call a meeting of the Grievance Committee within five (5) days of receipt of same. Within five (5) days following the meeting, the Chief Executive Officer shall reply, in writing, to the nurse and the Chairperson of the Grievance Committee. If the decision is unsatisfactory to the nurse, it may be referred to arbitration within fifteen (15) days and the Chief Executive Officer so notified, in writing.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!