LIST OF TABLES. Table 1.1
LIST OF TABLES. Table 1 Summary of Literature in AVs 2 Table 2 Summary of Literature on Adoption 6 Table 3 Summary of Literature on WTP 8 Table 4 Summary of Literature on Mode Choice 9 Table 5 Summary of Literature on Benefit and Concerns 10 Table 6 Summary of Literature on Perception of Technology and Operations 12 Table 7 Summary of Literature on Travel Demand 14 Table 8 Classification of Studies by Detailed Approach 16 Table 9 PCA result for AT1 (preferences for lifestyle and mobility options) 22 Table 10 PCA result for AT2 (perceived benefits and concerns of shared mobility) 23 Table 11 PCA result for AT3 (reasons toward or against private vehicle ownership) 24 Table 12 PCA result for AT4 (motivations for and desired features of AV) 24 Table 13 Result of Measurement Equations for AV Adoption and WTP 44 Table 14 Result of Structural Equations 45 Table 15 Result of Measurement Equations 50 Table 16 Result of Structural Model 52 Table 17 Results of Factor Analysis for Mode Dependency 56 Table 18 Linear SVM Model Performances 57 Table 19 Linear SVM Model Coefficients 59 Table 20 Mode Choice Model Results for Regular Trips (t-ratios in brackets) 68 Table 21 Mode Choice Model Results for Occasional Trips (t-ratios in brackets) 70 Table 22 Identified Latent Attitude Factors 72 Table 23 Model Results for Transit Users 74 Table 24 Model Results for Car Users 76 Table 25 Summary of Influential Attitudes to Emerging Mobility Options 81 Table 26 Summary of Influential Variables to Emerging Mobility Options 81 Table 27 Potential Model Changes for ACES Considerations 85 Today’s world is deeply influenced by the way new technology evolves. Advances in information and communication technologies have played an important role in how we live and travel and will continue to do so. Rapidly emerging mobile apps have contributed to the quick expansion of car sharing, ridesourcing, and various other on-demand services around the world. Similarly, connected and autonomous vehicle technologies are expected to bring a paradigm shift in how we define mobility. It is essential to incorporate ridesourcing and automated vehicle (AV) considerations into current long-range transportation planning efforts, which usually extends to the next 20 to 30 years. On the other hand, there are a lot of uncertainties with respect to technology development, regulations, and user acceptance that make it challenging to draw a clear picture of how shared mobility and AVs may affect our daily travel and the potential...
LIST OF TABLES. Table Page
LIST OF TABLES. Table 1 Median Age: Auglaize, Darke and Xxxxxx Counties, Ohio 13 Table 2 Population and Percent Change, 1950 – 2000 14 Table 3 Population and Percent Change 1990 – 2000 17 Table 4 Education Indicators: Auglaize, Darke and Xxxxxx Counties, Ohio 19 Table 5 Employment and Income Indicators: Auglaize, Darke and Xxxxxx Counties, Ohio 19 Table 6 Economic Impact of Tourism in Auglaize and Xxxxxx Counties 22 Table 7 Rare & Endangered Species, Upper Wabash Watershed 40 Table 8 Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water: Regulated Point Sources 62 Table 9 Land Use/Land Cover for Grand Lake/Wabash Watershed 63 Table 10 General Farm Structure 66 Table 11 2005 Commodity Production Rankings 66 Table 12 Coldwater Creek Acreage 82 Table 13 Coldwater Creek Riparian Corridor Status 85 Table 14 Coldwater Creek Operations and Animal Units 87 Table 15 Coldwater Creek Manure and Nutrient Production 89 Table 16 Coldwater Creek Livestock Operations and Proximity to Streams 90 Table 17 Coldwater Creek NPS Pollution Potential 92 Table 18 Grassy/Monroe Creeks Acreage 96 Table 19 Grassy/Monroe Creeks Riparian Corridor Status 98 Table 20 Grassy/Monroe Creeks Operations and Animal Units 100 Table 21 Grassy/Monroe Creeks Manure and Nutrient Production 102 Table 22 Grassy/Monroe Creeks Livestock Operations and Proximity to Streams103 Table 23 Grassy/Monroe Creeks NPS Pollution Potential 105 Table 24 Beaver Creek Acreage 109 Table 25 Beaver Creek Riparian Corridor Status 111 Table 26 Beaver Creek Operations and Animal Units 113 Table 27 Beaver Creek Manure and Nutrient Production 115 Table 28 Beaver Creek Livestock Operations and Proximity to Streams 116 Table 29 Beaver Creek NPS Pollution Potential 118 Table 30 Prairie Creek Acreage 122 Table 31 Prairie Creek Riparian Corridor Status 124 Table 32 Prairie Creek Operations and Animal Units 126 Table 33 Prairie Creek Manure and Nutrient Production 128 Table 34 Prairie Creek Livestock Operations and Proximity to Streams 129 Table 35 Prairie Creek NPS Pollution Potential 131 Table 36 Chickasaw Creek Acreage 135 Table 37 Chickasaw Creek Riparian Corridor Status 137 Table 38 Chickasaw Creek Operations and Animal Units 139 Table 39 Chickasaw Creek Manure and Nutrient Production 141 Table 40 Chickasaw Creek Livestock Operations and Proximity to Streams 142 Table 41 Chickasaw Creek NPS Pollution Potential 144 Table 42 Xxxxxx Creek Acreage 148 Table 43 Xxxxxx Creek Riparian Corridor Status 150 Table 44 Xxxxxx Creek Operations and Animal Units 152 Table 45 ...
LIST OF TABLES. Table 7-1. Shoreline use, development and modification matrix 43
LIST OF TABLES. Table 1-1. Table 7.1 from Appendix D of the Skagit Chinook Recovery Plan. Table 1-2. Restoration Projects Identified in the Skagit Chinook Recovery Plan Sorted by the Smolts Produced Per Acre. Table 2-1. Tidegates by Dike or Drainage District and by Priority. Table 2-2. Floodgates by Dike or Drainage District and by Habitat Tiers. Table 4-1. Drainage Area Calculation for Tidegate Maintenance Habitat Credit. Table 4-2. Habitat Requirements per Tidegate and Tier 1 Floodgates.
LIST OF TABLES. Table 2-1: 2016 Lake Chelan xxxxx survey angler data (lower lake). 6 Table 2-2: 2016 Lake Chelan xxxxx survey results (lower lake). 7 Table 2-3: 2016 Lake Chelan xxxxx survey angler data (upper lake). 8 Table 2-4: 2016 Lake Chelan xxxxx survey results (upper lake). 9 Table 2-5: 2016 Angler questionnaire results summary 11 Table 2-6: Angler preference for a trophy fishery and the species preferred by those who indicated they were in favor of a trophy fishery 12 Table 2-7: Estimated 2016 Lake Chelan tributary rainbow trout density and population abundance 13 Table 2-8: Estimated 2016 Lake Chelan tributary cutthroat trout density and population abundance 14 Table 2-9: Estimated 2015 Lake Chelan tributary rainbow trout density and population abundance 14 Table 2-10: Estimated 2015 Lake Chelan tributary cutthroat trout density and population abundance 14 Table 2-11: Estimated 2014 Lake Chelan tributary rainbow trout density and population abundance 15 Table 2-12: Estimated 2014 Lake Chelan tributary cutthroat trout density and population abundance 15 Table 2-13: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs. 2013 vs. 2016. ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Table 2-14: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs. 2015. 16 Table 2-15: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs. 2014. 16 Table 2-16: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs 2013. 16 Table 2-17: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs. 2012. 17 Table 2-18: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs. 2011. 17 Table 2-19: Lake Chelan tributary kokanee escapement estimates, peak counts and peak count dates, 2016. 20 Table 2-20: Amount of side channel habitat assessed, habitat suitable for kokanee spawning and migration, and number of fish sample segments in the Stehekin River expanded kokanee spawning surveys; 2000, 2010 and 2015. 20 Table 3-1: 2014 Fish Stocking Plan. 28 Table 3-2: 2014 Actual Fish Stocking 29 Table 3-3: 2015 Fish Stocking Plan. 29 Table 3-4: 2015 Actual Fish Stocking 30 Table 3-5: 2016 Fish Stocking Plan. 30 Table 3-6: 2016 Actual Fish Stocking 31 Table 3-7: 2017 Fish Stocking Plan. 31 Table 3-8: Estimated USFS budget and schedule for Fish Creek xXXX survey 32 Table 3-9: Estimated WDFW budget and schedule for tributary trout abundance 33 Table 3-10: Estimated 2017 NPS budget and schedule for westslo...
LIST OF TABLES. Table 1-1. Examples of Typical Protection and Restoration Actions 1-4 Table 1-2. Typical Restoration Phases and Actions 1-5 Table 2-1. Xxxxx County Restoration Goals, Objectives, Actions, and Success Measures 2-4 Table 4-1. Recommendations and Priorities for Protection, Restoration, and Enhancement in the Marine Shorelines of Xxxxx County Based upon Coastal Processes 4-3 Table 4-3. Recommendations and Priorities for Protection, Restoration and Enhancement in South Puget Sound 4-4 Table 5-1. Miles of Shoreline Recommended for Different Strategies to Achieve Sediment Supply, Sediment Transport, and Tidal Flow 5-4 Table 5-2. Restoration Opportunities on Public Shores of Hood Canal 5-6 Table 5-3. Restoration Opportunities on Public Shores of South Puget Sound 5-12 Table 6-1. Restoration Actions for Xxxxx County Lakes 6-5 Table 7-1. Restoration Actions for Xxxxx County Rivers and Streams – WRIA 14a 7-4 Table 7-2. Restoration Actions for Xxxxx County Rivers and Streams – WRIA 15 7-10 Table 7-3. Restoration Actions for Xxxxx County Rivers and Streams – WRIA 16/14b 7-14 Table 7-4. Restoration Actions for Xxxxx County Rivers and Streams – Table 8-1. Potential Restoration Partner Organizations and their Roles in Future Restoration 8-2
