MEMBER EVALUATIONS Sample Clauses

MEMBER EVALUATIONS. The following principles shall be applied in the evaluation of member performance:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
MEMBER EVALUATIONS. Host Site must complete an evaluation of each member’s term of service. Members who do not receive an evaluation are not eligible for their education award and will be exited for cause. Host Site must complete a mid-term evaluation of each FT, TQT, and HT member, as well as any other less-than HT members (RHT, QT, MT, AT) that serve over a period of 9 months or more, within a reasonable period of the mid-date of the member term. Host Site must complete an end-of-term evaluation of each member and submit it to Program within [7 days] of the member’s last day of service as indicated on the Member Service Agreement (MSA). Evaluations must be signed and dated by both the member and site supervisor.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
MEMBER EVALUATIONS. Host sites must complete evaluation of each member’s term of service. Members who do not receive an evaluation are not eligible for their education award and will be exited for cause. Host sites must complete a mid-term evaluation of each full-time and half-time member by the first working Friday in March. Host sites must complete an end-of-term evaluation of each member and submit it to the [AMERICORPS PROGRAM] within 7 days of the member’s last day of service as indicated on the member service agreement. Evaluations must be signed and dated by both the member and site supervisor.
Sample 1

Related to MEMBER EVALUATIONS

  • TEACHER EVALUATIONS A. Each teacher shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her personal file folder.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Formal Evaluations The employer shall undertake formal evaluations of an employee’s performance of the various duties and responsibilities of a position only if one or more of the following conditions is present: • employee request • mutual agreement of hiring unit and employee • recommendation arising from informal evaluation • decision of Chair, Xxxx, Director or designate resulting from the processing of a complaint in accordance with Article 8.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 3. Any matter for which there is recourse under State or Federal statutes.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Focused Evaluation The Focused Evaluation is used when a teacher is not evaluated using the Comprehensive Evaluation process, and will include evaluation of one of the eight state criteria (student growth impact required). If a non-provisional teacher has scored at Proficient or higher the previous year, they may be moved to Focused Evaluation. The teacher may remain on the Focused Evaluation for five (5) years before returning to the Comprehensive Evaluation. The teacher or the evaluator can initiate a move from the Focused to the Comprehensive Evaluation. A decision to move a teacher from a Focused to a Comprehensive Evaluation must occur by December 15.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Re-evaluation a) When a job has moved to a higher group as a result of re-evaluation, the resulting rate shall be retroactive from the date that Management or the employee has applied to the Plant Job Review Committee for re-evaluation.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the fall semester.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.