Outcome Measurements. General Management Solutions, Inc. will maintain systems in place to measure program performance and ensure continuous quality improvement. To measure progress toward career center success indicators Entered into Employment, Retention Rate and Average Earnings earned, the Program Manager will utilize XXXXXXX.XXX. o Number of new enrollments o Number of participants that found employment during the month o Number of participants that are enrolled into training o Number that completed training o Number of participants that exited the program during the month o Summary of participants training programs (i.e. Bio Bootcamp, Medical Coding, etc.)
Outcome Measurements. Educational Data Systems, Inc. will maintain systems in place to measure program performance and ensure continuous quality improvement. To measure progress toward career center success indicators EDSI will use the number of dislocated workers identified as in need of short-term occupational skills training, # enrolled in Bootcamp/ short-term occupational skills training/ Work Experience, retention rate of short term occupational skills training/ Work Experience, exited with employment, and the average wage first quarter after exit with employment. The Program Manager will utilize XXXXXXX.XXX to schedule services and track the participants’ progress. o Number identified as in need of short-term occupational skills training/Work Experience. o Number enrolled in Bootcamp o Number enrolled in short-term occupational skills training outside of Bootcamp by training type. o Number of North Carolina Institute of Minority Economic Development (NCIMED) Pilot program students provided Work Experience o Number of Dislocated Worker Contingency Fund (DWCF) recipients completing training by month and total. o Number of NCIMED Pilot Program Participants completing the three month Work Experience o Number DWCF recipients exiting program with employment o Average wage first, second, and third quarter after exit
Outcome Measurements. Educational Data Systems Incorporated will maintain systems in place to measure program performance and ensure continuous quality improvement. The Contractor is expected to have participant data keyed into NCWorks Online within 15 days of service to ensure that outcomes can be measured in a timely fashion.
Outcome Measurements. Educational Data Systems, Inc. will maintain systems in place to measure program performance and ensure continuous quality improvement. To measure progress toward NCWorks Career Center success indicators entered into employment, retention rate, average earnings earned, credential rate, and measurable skills gain, the Program Manager will utilize XXXXXXX.XXX. A monthly report compiled by the Program Manager due to OEWD by the 13th of each month will include the following: o Budget and expenditure information by formula Adult Worker/ Dislocated Worker (year to date expenditures, total expenditures and remaining funds) OJT Formula/ Federal, and Contingency funds o Number of new enrollments o Number of Active clients served (year to date, and monthly) o Number carried over from previous year o Total Clients Served o Number exited (year to date, and monthly) o Number of clients in follow up (year to date and monthly) o Number of clients exhausted from program year to date o Number of participants that found employment during the month o Number of Unsubsidized employments (Year to date and Monthly) o Number of participants that are enrolled into training o Number that completed training o Summary of participants training programs (i.e. Bio Bootcamp, Medical Coding, etc.)
Outcome Measurements. Educational Data Systems, Inc. will maintain systems in place to measure program performance and ensure continuous quality improvement. To measure progress toward career center success indicators Entered into Employment, Retention Rate and Average Earnings earned, the Program Manager will utilize XXXXXXX.XXX. o Budget and expenditure information by formula Adult Worker/ Dislocated Worker (year to date expenditures, total expenditures and remaining funds) OJT Formula/ Federal, and Contingency funds o Number of new enrollments o Number of Active clients served (year to date, and monthly) o Number carried over from previous year o Total Clients Served o Number exited (year to date, and monthly) o Number of clients in follow up (year to date and monthly) o Number of clients exhausted from program year to date o Number of participants that found employment during the month o Number of Unsubsidized employments (Year to date and Monthly) o Number of participants that are enrolled into training o Number that completed training o Summary of participants training programs (i.e. Bio Bootcamp, Medical Coding, etc.)
Outcome Measurements. 222. In addition to compliance reviews, the Monitor will conduct semi-annual qualitative and quantitative outcome assessments to measure whether the implementation of this Agreement has created: (1) capable systems and resources for responding to persons in mental health crisis; (2) competent accountability and oversight systems; (3) effective training for police officers that increases the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary for effective and successful delivery of service to persons in mental health crisis; (4) proper management of the use of force to meet constitutional standards; and (5) robust systems of community engagement. These outcome assessments will be informed by the following:
a. Use of Force Data:
i. the number of police interactions where force was used on individuals in an actual or perceived mental health crisis, including the type of force used; the reason for the interaction, i.e., suspected criminal conduct or a well- being check; the threat to public safety, including whether the person was armed and if so, weapon type; a description of the facts and circumstances of resistance offered, if any; and a description of any attempts at strategic disengagement or de-escalation;
ii. the rate of force used per arrest by PPB; force type used; geographic area (i.e., street address, neighborhood, or police precinct); reason for arrest; and the subject’s age, gender, race, and whether they were in an actual or perceived mental health crisis);
iii. the number of officers who repeatedly use force within the outcome measurement reporting period, or have more than one instance of force found to violate policy;
iv. number of officer and subject injuries resulting from force interactions, and force type used by the officer; and
v. a comparison of the category of non-deadly use of force cases for force used against persons in a mental health crisis and persons not in a mental health crisis.
b. Mental health interaction data on:
i. Percentage of ECIT dispatched calls that have an ECIT officer on-scene;
ii. MCPT, currently known as Behavioral Health Response Team (BHRT), dispositions, including the percent of outcomes that are due to behavioral health system coordination (i.e., coordinated services, civil commitment, and systems coordination);
iii. the number of people with an actual or perceived mental illness encountered by PPB;
iv. the number of calls for service involving an individual with an actual or perceived mental illness who has been the ...
Outcome Measurements. General Management Solutions, Inc. will maintain systems in place to measure program performance and ensure continuous quality improvement. To measure progress toward career center success indicators Entered into Employment, Retention Rate and Average Earnings earned, the Program Manager will utilize XXXXXXX.XXX. A monthly report compiled by the Program Manager due to OEWD by the 13th of each month will include the following: o Number of new enrollments o Number of participants that found employment during the month o Number of participants that are enrolled into training o Number that completed training o Number of participants that exited the program during the month o Summary of participants training programs (i.e. Bio Bootcamp, Medical Coding, etc.)
Outcome Measurements. 367. In addition to compliance reviews and audits, the Monitor will conduct qualitative and quantitative assessments to measure whether implementing this Agreement has resulted in constitutional policing. The measurements relating to use of force; addressing individuals in crisis; and stop, search, and arrest are not intended to expand the City’s data collection requirements set forth elsewhere in the Agreement. These outcome assessments will include collecting and analyzing, at least annually, the following outcome data, trends, and patterns:
a. Use of force measurements, including:
1. number of use-of-force incidents as compared to number of arrests, with use-of-force incidents broken down by force type, District, type of related arrest (if any); actual or perceived race, ethnicity, age, and gender of the subject; and, if indicated at the time force was used, the subject’s mental or medical condition, use of drugs or alcohol, or the presence of a disability;
2. number of injuries to officers and public, the rate at which officer and subject injuries decrease or increase overall and by severity of injury; number of force complaints, disposition of complaints, source of complaint (internal or external), force type, geographic area, and any identified demographic category of complainant;
3. the rate at which ECW usage decreases or increases compared to the use of force overall and by weapon;
4. number of uses of force found to violate policy, broken down by force type, geographic area, type of arrest; actual or perceived race, ethnicity, age, and gender of the subject; and, if indicated at the time force was used, the subject’s mental or medical condition, use of drugs or alcohol, or the presence of a disability;
5. number of officers who have more than one instance of use of force in violation of policy;
6. force reviews or investigations indicating a policy, training, or tactical deficiency; and
7. quality of use of force investigations and reviews; and number and rate of use of force administrative investigations which are returned for lack of completeness.
b. Addressing individuals in crisis measurements, including:
1. number of calls for service and incidents that appear to involve an individual in crisis, broken down by whether specialized CIT officers responded to the calls; and the rate of individuals in crisis directed to the healthcare system, rather than the judicial system;
2. number of police interactions where force was used on individuals in ...
Outcome Measurements. Systematic method of assessing the extent to which a program has achieved its intended result.
Outcome Measurements. The Secretary shall establish a method to verify that actions described in section 771.117(c) of title 23, Code of Federal Regula- tions (as in effect on the date of enactment of this subsection), are evaluated and documented in a con- sistent manner by the State that uses the template programmatic agreement under this subsection.’’ Engineering Judgment Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, § 1529, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 583, provided that: ‘‘Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [see section 3(a), (b)
