Performance Measurement and Evaluation Sample Clauses

Performance Measurement and Evaluation. The Contractor shall identify the type, quantity, and quality of data that need to be collected to estimate the mobility, environment, and public agency efficiency-related performance measures documented in the site-specific Refined Evaluation Plans. This section shall also describe the overall approach for collecting the data.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Measurement and Evaluation. A key element of SFRF is the requirement that use of federal funds be tied to performance measurement strategies capable of demonstrating whether an initiative achieved its intended outcome. As the subject matter expert for the program(s), Agency shall be responsible, in consultation with the Governor’s Office, for proposing a set of evaluative metrics for the program(s) in the Reporting and Compliance Form. The evaluative metrics shall be designed to produce quantitative numerical data that can be usefully subjected to standard statistical analyses. The metrics may include opinion or satisfaction data. As the office responsible for reporting initiative outcomes, PRO shall review the metrics proposed by Agency and shall work with the Agency to ensure the metrics are appropriate and comply with all federal reporting requirements. Agency shall be responsible for collecting the numerical data necessary to evaluate the output and outcomes of the initiative and provide this information to PRO as requested. Agency shall also be responsible for collecting qualitative data using a structured methodology. These data may consist of testimonials or narratives describing the experiences of initiative participants. This information shall be provided to PRO as requested. Agency shall provide reports monthly on initiative activities and outputs in the form and manner requested by the PRO.
Sample 1Sample 2
Performance Measurement and Evaluation a) A system of performance evaluation of the work done, feed back of the results, analysis of deviations as compared to plan and initiation and completion of corrective action before the next cycle; in this case a cycle time is only 24 hours, elaborated below shall be introduced.
Sample 1
Performance Measurement and Evaluation. The parties will: • jointly develop baseline data for this Agreement, focussing primarily on reporting against the key targets outlined in this Agreement, and agree on a relevant dataset that can be reported against on a quarterly basis; • monitor and evaluate progress against the timeframes and performance indicators outlined in the Project Plans and provide sufficient information to the RPC for that purpose; • undertake a formal evaluation of progress against the targets and key performance indicators contained in the Agreement in July 2008 with annual reviews thereafter for the duration of the Agreement; and • provide performance information for evaluations as agreed to from time to time and not unreasonably withhold permission for such.
Sample 1
Performance Measurement and Evaluation. 5.1 All parties will support a baseline data study as per Schedule A Part 7, to inform negotiations for additional Schedules and improve the capacity to measure changes in outcomes in the communities.
Sample 1
Performance Measurement and Evaluation. A. Performance Measurement and Evaluation Planning Process The Contractor shall name a person who will lead performance measurement, evaluation, and continuous quality improvement activities for each addendum. A Performance Measurement and Evaluation (PME) Plan shall be co-developed for each Program. The PME Plans are intended to detail the activities necessary to provide both Parties with useful information for decision-making, planning and program management. Both Parties shall work collaboratively to identify relevant measures of service delivery, quality and Program results, and then determine the mechanisms by which required information will be collected, managed and reported. Department of Community and Human Services/Behavioral Health and Recovery Division (DCHS/BHRD) and its PME unit are responsible for providing a first draft of the PME Plans. The PME Plans shall be considered final after written acceptance is received by both Parties. Email communication is sufficient.
Sample 1
Performance Measurement and Evaluation. The Contractor shall submit performance metrics and program data as set forth in Exhibits to this Contract. The Contractor shall participate in evaluation activities as required by the City and shall make available all information required by any such performance measurement and evaluation processes.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Measurement and Evaluation. The Recipient shall:
Sample 1
Performance Measurement and Evaluation. A. Performance Measurement and Evaluation Planning Process The Contractor shall name a person who will lead performance measurement, evaluation, and continuous quality improvement activities, as outlined in this Exhibit. A Performance Measurement and Evaluation (PME) Plan shall be co-developed by the County and the Contractor. The plan is intended to provide the Contractor and King County with useful information for decision-making, planning and program management. The Contractor and King County staff shall work collaboratively to identify relevant measures of service delivery, quality and program results, and determine the mechanisms by which required information will be collected, managed and reported. King County is responsible for providing a first draft of the PME plan. The PME Plan shall be considered final after written acceptance is received by both parties. Email communication is sufficient.
Sample 1

Related to Performance Measurement and Evaluation

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.