QA/QC Review. CONSULTANT shall perform a review of all deliverables submitted to the CITY as part of the Task 19. The reviews will follow the QA/QC plan established for this project. • CITY will compile the Project Manual and bidding documents. • CITY will coordinate uploading of bidding documents to the CITY’s preferred planhold site.
QA/QC Review. Consultant shall perform an internal quality review at the 60%, 90%, and 100% levels of completion with all comments made by the quality reviewers addressed and appropriately incorporated into the documents prior to submittal to City for review.
QA/QC Review. CONSULTANT shall perform a senior level review of all deliverables associated with this task prior to being submitted to the CITY. The reviews will follow the QA/QC plan established for this project. • The CONSULTANT will lead all permitting efforts. • CONSULTANT will not be required to provide Mazama Pocket Gopher habitat calculations and compensatory habitat area calculations. • It is assumed that the roundabout improvements will be designed to stay within the previous project footprint defined by the CITY. • Findings from desktop critical areas review and field assessment will be documented within the Habitat Protection Plan. • The Project is exempt from 16.08.080.C
QA/QC Review. CONSULTANT shall perform a senior level review of all deliverables associated with this task prior to being submitted to the CITY. The reviews will follow the QA/QC plan established for this project.
QA/QC Review. CONSULTANT shall perform a senior level review of all deliverables associated with this task prior to being submitted to the CITY. The reviews will follow the QA/QC plan established for this project. • CITY will provide a list of contact names for utility located within the project limits. • It is assumed that undergrounding of overhead utilities into a joint utility trench will be required for the FRONTAGE project site. • Preliminary Utility Base Map (PDF format) • Conflict Assessment Map (PDF format) • Conflict Assessment Log (Excel & PDF format) CONSULTANT will advance the FRONTAGE project design to a 75% level after the 30% design submittal and finalize the design details between the 75% and Draft Final design submittals.
QA/QC Review. CONSULTANT shall perform a review of all deliverables submitted to the CITY as part of the Task 16. The reviews will follow the QA/QC plan established for this project. • Roll Plots will be submitted in PDF and AutoCAD format. • City will provide a list of bid items with special provisions that the CITY uses in their construction documents. • OPCC will be provided in CITY preferred format with bid items in order of the WSDOT specification number.
QA/QC Review. CONSULTANT shall perform a review of all deliverables submitted to the CITY as part of this task. The reviews will follow the QA/QC plan established for this project. • Plans will be submitted in PDF format. • The number of sheets identified is an estimate based on the scope of work and project limits identified. The actual sheet count will include what is necessary to produce a readable, biddable, and constructible plan set. • Plans will follow APWA and CITY drafting standards • OPCC will be provided in CITY preferred format (ordered by WSDOT spec no.) • 75% Plans • 75% Specifications • 75% OPCC The Draft Final design submittal will consist of draft final construction plans and project specifications updated from the 75% submittal, and a 75% opinion of probable construction costs. CONSULTANT will develop comment response resolution forms to document the 75% comment resolution process. The following plans will be included with the Draft Final design submittal: Cover Sheet – (1 sheet) The Cover Sheet will be updated to address comments received on the 75% design
QA/QC Review. CONSULTANT shall perform a review of all deliverables submitted to the CITY as part of the Task 18. The reviews will follow the QA/QC plan established for this project. • Plans will be submitted in AutoCAD and PDF format. • The number of sheets identified is an estimate based on the scope of work and project limits identified. The actual sheet count will include what is necessary to produce a readable, biddable, and constructible plan set. • Plans will follow APWA and CITY drafting standards • OPCC will be provided in City preferred format (ordered by WSDOT spec no.) Task 18 - Deliverables: • Draft Final Plans • Draft Final Specifications • Draft Final OPCC This task includes efforts to address comments on the Draft Final design submittal, support the CITY with compiling the Project Manual for advertisement and bidding, and responding to questions during bidding.
QA/QC Review. CONSULTANT shall perform a review of all deliverables submitted to the CITY as part of the Task 21. The reviews will follow the QA/QC plan established for this project. • Roll Plots will be submitted in PDF and AutoCAD format. • City will provide a list of bid items with special provisions that the CITY uses in their construction documents. • OPCC will be provided in CITY preferred format with bid items in order of the WSDOT specification number. • 30% Roll Plots(s) • 30% Design Documentation Memo • 30% OPCC The 75% design submittal will consist of the 75% construction plans, a draft of the project special provisions, and a 75% opinion of probable construction costs. CONSULTANT will develop comment response resolution forms to document the 30% comment resolution process.
Task 22.2 75% Plans
QA/QC Review. CONSULTANT shall perform a review of all deliverables submitted to the CITY as part of this Task. The reviews will follow the QA/QC plan established for this project. • Plans will be submitted in PDF format. • The number of sheets identified is an estimate based on the scope of work and project limits identified. The actual sheet count will include what is necessary to produce a readable, biddable, and constructible plan set. • Plans will follow APWA and CITY drafting standards • OPCC will be provided in CITY preferred format (ordered by WSDOT spec no.) • 75% Plans • 75% Specifications • 75% OPCC
