Roadway Plans Sample Clauses

Roadway Plans. Garver will perform the following as applicable:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Roadway Plans. Printing Costs (bond) = $0.45 per square foot (sq. ft.) Reduced Sheets (11"x17") = Full-Size Sheets (22"x34") = Full-Size Mylar Sheets = 1.3 sq. ft. 5.2 sq. ft. $7.50 each Total Number of Sheets = 55 Pre-Final Submittal IDOT Oswego Utilities N/A Total Reduced Plan Sets 5 2 10 17 Subtotal: $546.98 Final Submittal IDOT Oswego Utilities N/A Total Reduced Plan Sets 5 2 10 17 Subtotal: $546.98 Subtotal: $140.00 ($10.00 per specifications book X 14 sets of specifications) Mileage Rate: $0.655 Mileage Number Destination Round-Trip of Trips HRG (Aurora) to Client 22 2 Mileage: $28.82 Subtotal: $28.82 2.11 Administration Postage Allowance $ 200.00 Subtotal: $200.00 Exhibit D May 4, 2022 Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, PE Project Manager - Transportation XX XXXXX, INC. 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxx 000 Aurora, IL 60506 Re: Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Services Xxxxxxx Road Bridge over Xxxxxx Creek Phase II Engineering Services Oswego, Kendal County, Illinois Wang No. P220417 Dear Xx. Xxxxxxxx: Xxxx Engineering, Inc. (Xxxx) is pleased to present this proposal to provide geotechnical drilling, laboratory testing, engineering analyses, and recommendations for the Phase II engineering services for the proposed replacement of the bridge carrying Xxxxxxx Road Bridge over Xxxxxx Creek, in Oswego, Kendall County, Illinois. Xxxx prepared a structure geotechnical report (SGR) during Phase I design. This proposal is for a roadway geotechnical roadway report (RGR) and preliminary environmental site assessment for soil disposal. The following describes our proposed scope of work, cost estimate, and assumptions made in developing the cost estimate.
Sample 1
Roadway Plans. The Roadway Expansion will be designed by the City Engineer, or such other engineer as is selected by the City, in accordinace with applicable rules and regulations. Upon completion of the preliminary plans and specifications for the Roadway Expansion (the “Roadway Plans”), the City Engineer will submit a set of the Roadway Plans to Developer for review. Developer may, at its election, provide a written request to the City specifically identifying any requested additions to the Roadway Plans, which may include a deceleration lane into or other improvements serving the Development, within thirty (30) days of receipt. If Developer fails to provide such written request within this thirty (30)-day period, Developer will be deemed to have requested no additions to the Roadway Plans. In the event that Developer does timely request additions to the Roadway Plans as set forth herein, the City agrees to cooperate with Developer to agree on modifications to the Roadway Plans, provided that the City and Developer will enter into a cost sharing agreement pursuant to which Developer will fund all costs incurred by the City in connection with the design, permitting and construction of such additions.
Sample 1
Roadway Plans. The plans and specifications for improvements to Olympia Drive prepared by Tenant and approved by Landlord, entitled “Olympia Drive Plan,” prepared by Xxxxxx & Associates, Inc., dated July 20, 2012, included as Sheets C8 and C9 of the Approved Plans, a copy of which plans and specifications are on file with Landlord, Tenant, and the Amherst Town Clerk.
Sample 1
Roadway Plans. The roadway plans are working drawings that show the location, configuration and dimensions of the prescribed work that includes: layouts, profiles, structures and other necessary details. The civil plan set will consist of the following drawings:
Sample 1
Roadway Plans. The roadway plans will be prepared under the supervision of a Professional Engineer and will consist of the following drawings: ▪ Cover Sheet 1 Sheet ▪ Index of Sheets, Highway Standards and Commitments 1 Sheets ▪ General Notes 2 Sheets ▪ Summary of Quantities 6 Sheets ▪ Schedule of Quantities 6 Sheets ▪ Typical Sections 4 Sheets ▪ Alignment, Ties and Benchmarks 1 Sheets ▪ Removal Plan 2 Sheets ▪ Plan & Profile 4 Sheets ▪ Drainage and Utility Plan and Profile 4 Sheets ▪ Detour Plan and Notes 2 Sheets ▪ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and Notes 1 Sheets ▪ Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Details 8 Sheets ▪ In-Stream Guideline Details 1 Sheets ▪ Grading Plan – Bridge and Channel 2 Sheets ▪ Plat of Highways 10 Sheets ▪ Pavement Marking & Signing 2 Sheets ▪ Landscaping Plan 3 Sheets ▪ Structural Sheets See Task 6 ▪ Detail Sheets 2 Sheets ▪ District One Details 5 Sheets ▪ Cross Sections 20 Sheets
Sample 1
Roadway Plans. Title sheet; detailed index; general notes; typical sections; summary of quantities; estimated quantities; plan-profile sheets; special design sheets; construction sequencing sheets (when necessary), traffic signal sheets, traffic control plan; complete form grades for interchange ramps, loops, and channelized intersections (in accordance with current Design Manual, at 25 feet intervals); permanent directional signing sheets that include layouts, details (signs and overhead assemblies), and estimated quantities; detailed pavement marking sheets; Right-of-Way Coordinate Sheet(s), final cross- sections; and all notes and data used to develop the plans.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Roadway Plans. 1. Unless instructed otherwise by the Project Manager, Conceptual Roadway Plans will be limited to the Title Sheet(s), Typical Sections, and Plan-Profile Sheets. If specified in the Work Assignment, a Preliminary Traffic Control Plan and phase construction details shall be included to ensure that traffic can be maintained and the project is constructable as proposed. If specified in the Work Assignment, conceptual permanent signing and striping plans shall be required. 2. For Work Assignments that include grade separations, the CONSULTANT may be required to conduct an over/under analysis at each grade separation to determine the most cost-effective solution as to which route is to be bridged. Factors to be considered include, but are not limited to, Right-of-Way acquisition, maintenance of traffic, bridge cost, existing elevations at both proposed roadways, and constructability. 3. For Work Assignments that include design of new or reconstructed interchanges, the CONSULTANT shall include all applicable horizontal and vertical alignment information of the interchange. 4. For Work Assignments that require local road improvements to be made as a result of the primary purpose of the project, the CONSULTANT shall investigate all local roads within the project limits to determine the appropriate approach to reconstructing the local roads to an acceptable design while keeping additional costs to a minimum. Factors to be considered include, but are not limited to, intersection sight distance, angle of intersection, offset intersections, and crossover spacing. 5. For Work Assignments that include local roads to be reconstructed as the primary purpose of the project, the CONSULTANT shall investigate the local roads to determine the appropriate approach to reconstruct the local roads to an acceptable design to meet the goals of the project. Factors to be considered include, but are not limited to, intersection sight distance, angle of intersection, offset intersections, and crossover spacing. 6. For Work Assignments that include lighting, the CONSULTANT shall provide a lighting plan to determine the most effective means of lighting the roadway to achieve the desired lighting levels. The Conceptual Plans shall show the location of the proposed lighting assemblies and provide information for MDOT’s review. Height of poles, number of luminaires, type of lamps, and any special features required shall be indicated on the plans. The CONSULTANT shall ensure the proposed lay...
Sample 1
Roadway Plans. The Roadway Plans shall contain, at a minimum:
Sample 1

Related to Roadway Plans

  • Loop Makeup Response Time - Electronic Exclusions Business Rules

  • Benefit Plans (a) Section 5.13(a) of the Hanover Disclosure Letter lists each material “employee benefit plan” (as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA), and all other material employee benefit, bonus, incentive, deferred compensation, stock option (or other equity-based), severance, change in control, welfare (including post-retirement medical and life insurance) and fringe benefit plans, programs and arrangements, whether or not subject to ERISA and, whether written or oral (i) sponsored, maintained or contributed to or required to be contributed to by Hanover or any of its Subsidiaries or to which Hanover or any of its Subsidiaries is a party and (ii) in which any individual who is currently or has been an officer, director or employee of Hanover (a “Hanover Employee”) is a participant (the “Hanover Benefit Plans”). Neither Hanover, any of its Subsidiaries nor any ERISA Affiliate thereof has any commitment or formal plan, whether legally binding or not, to create any additional employee benefit plan or modify or change any existing Hanover Benefit Plan that would affect any Hanover Employee except in the ordinary course of business. Hanover has heretofore delivered or made available to Xxxxxx and Spinco true and complete copies of each Hanover Benefit Plan and any amendments thereto (or if the plan is not a written plan, a description thereof), any related trust or other funding vehicle, the most recent annual reports or summaries required to be prepared or filed under ERISA or the Code and the most recent determination letter received from the IRS with respect to each such plan intended to qualify under Section 401 of the Code and the three most recent years (A) the Form 5500s and attached Schedules, (B) audited financial statements and (C) actuarial valuation reports. (b) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a material liability to Hanover, (i) neither Hanover nor any of its ERISA Affiliates has incurred any liability under Title IV or Section 302 of ERISA or under Section 412 of the Code that has not been satisfied in full, and (ii) no condition exists that would reasonably be expected to result in Hanover incurring any such liability. (i) No Hanover Benefit Plan is a “multiemployer pension plan,” as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA and (ii) none of Hanover, or any ERISA Affiliate thereof has made or suffered a “complete withdrawal” or a “partial withdrawal,” as such terms are respectively defined in Sections 4203 and 4205 of ERISA, the liability for which would reasonably be expected to result in a material liability to Hanover. (d) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a material liability to Hanover, each Hanover Benefit Plan has been operated and administered in all respects in accordance with its terms and applicable law, including, but not limited to, ERISA, the Code and the laws of any applicable foreign jurisdiction. Except as would not result in a material liability to Hanover, all contributions required to be made with respect to any Hanover Benefit Plan have been timely made. There are no pending or, to Hanover’s Knowledge, threatened claims by, on behalf of or against any of the Hanover Benefit Plans or any assets thereof, other than routine claims for benefits under such plans, that, if adversely determined could, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect on Hanover or any of its Subsidiaries and no matter is pending (other than routine qualification determination filings, copies of which have been furnished to Xxxxxx and Spinco or will be promptly furnished to Xxxxxx and Spinco when made) with respect to any of the Hanover Benefit Plans before the IRS, the United States Department of Labor or the PBGC that would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a material liability to Hanover. (e) Each Hanover Benefit Plan intended to be “qualified” within the meaning of Section 401(a) of the Code has received a determination letter from the IRS stating that they and the trusts maintained thereunder are exempt from taxation under Section 401(a) of the Code, respectively, and each trust maintained under any Hanover Benefit Plan intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 501(c)(9) of the Code has satisfied such requirements and, in any such case, no event has occurred or condition is known to exist that would reasonably be expected to adversely affect such tax-qualified status for any such Hanover Benefit Plan or any such trust. (f) No Hanover Benefit Plan is maintained outside the jurisdiction of the United States, or covers any employee residing or working outside the United States. (g) Except as otherwise provided in or contemplated by this Agreement or any Executed Transaction Agreement, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall not result by itself or with the passage of time in the payment or acceleration of any amount, the accrual or acceleration of any benefit or any increase in any vested interest or entitlement to any benefit or payment by any employee, officer or director under domestic or foreign law that would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a material liability to Hanover.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!