Timing/Process Sample Clauses

Timing/Process. The Superintendent’s evaluation shall be conducted by August 31 each year for the previous fiscal year. The Superintendent shall be responsible for notifying the Board, in writing, of these timelines so that the Board’s evaluation of the Superintendent can be conducted in a timely manner. Nothing shall prevent the Board from conducting more than one formal or informal evaluation each school year. In addition to the summative evaluation, the Board shall conduct at least one formative evaluation no later than March 31 of each year to share comments and hear progress reports related to the Board’s goals for the Superintendent. The final evaluation, the Superintendent's self-evaluation, action plans, and all related documents shall be placed in the Superintendent's personnel file.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Timing/Process. The timing values, for use in ExcelCare, are recorded by nurses/midwives using work-sampling techniques. The relevant definition is for stop/start times. That is, timing commences at the point when the nurses begins preparation for the activity and stops when the nurse and midwife completes the activity, including cleaning up and disposal of equipment where this is defined in the OI. Interruptions are excluded from the time. A total of 20 timings are collected randomly and should be representative of all areas and patients where the activity occurs and a range of nursing expertise. If the timings sample reveals that some patient groups have significant deviations from the mean, consideration should be given to reviewing if the UoC is appropriate to the needs of the patient group. Possible bias that may occur during the timing process, that may influence the quality of timings, could include: • reliability of collection • definition and specificity of activity to be timed • skill of nurse performing procedure • differences in procedures/activities between areas • geography of work areas • patient variables If there is bias operating related to geography and skill then the total sample should included 20 timings of each skill or type of geographical setting. The direct timing should be collected within a few weeks to reduce any possible bias's that may occur. If it is not possible to collect the timings within this period of time, then the UoC should: • Professionally assessed time added until there is significant timings collected; or • The UoC should be time adjusted. As agreed to by the Department of Human Services (now DH) and the then ANF (now ANMF) on 22 November 2002: ‘All health sites must use the agreed Department of Health timings process (package) or apply the agreed statistical methodology which requires the actual repeated timing of the OIs to be delivered and the determination of a mean time for inclusion in the UoC. Staff consultation should take place in the same manner as set out for the review of UoC above.' ‘Where new UoCs are being developed or implemented without timings that have been validated through this process, the relevant nursing and midwifery staff should be consulted about the interim timing to be used and this process should reflect the same consultative process as set out for the review of UoC2.’ References
Sample 1Sample 2
Timing/Process. The Assistant Superintendent, Educational Services’ evaluation shall be conducted by June 30th each year for the previous fiscal year.
Sample 1
Timing/Process. The Assistant Superintendent, Human Resources’ evaluation shall be conducted by June 30th each year for the previous fiscal year.
Sample 1
Timing/Process. The Interim Superintendent’s evaluation shall be conducted by August 31 each year for the previous fiscal year. The Interim Superintendent shall be responsible for notifying the Board, in writing, of these timelines so that the Board’s evaluation of the Interim Superintendent can be conducted in a timely manner. Nothing shall prevent the Board from conducting more than one formal or informal evaluation each school year. In addition to the summative evaluation, the Board shall conduct at least one formative evaluation no later than March 31 of each year to share comments and hear progress reports related to the Board’s goals for the Interim Superintendent. The final evaluation, the Interim Superintendent's self-evaluation, action plans, and all related documents shall be placed in the Interim Superintendent's personnel file.
Sample 1
Timing/Process. The Superintendent’s evaluation shall be conducted by June 30th each year for the previous fiscal year. The Superintendent shall be responsible for notifying the Board, in writing, of these timelines so that the Board’s evaluation of the Superintendent can be conducted in a timely manner. Nothing shall prevent the Board from conducting more than one formal or informal evaluation each school year.
Sample 1

Related to Timing/Process

  • Timing of Development The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, residential units that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Timing of Evaluations Annual performance evaluations shall normally take place near the anniversary date of completion of original probation. However, as to employees who have been rehired as a restoration or after a reduction in force, the date of rehire shall be the anniversary date for the annual evaluation. The Human Resources Department will attempt to secure agency cooperation in conducting the evaluation process in reasonable relationship to the above schedule. Failure to conduct a timely annual rating shall not be grievable. Deadline for Evaluation Meetings: A meeting to discuss an evaluation shall be held within forty- five (45) days after the applicable anniversary date, or after the end of any prescriptive period for remediation (“PPR”) or warning period. This deadline may be extended to accommodate the employee’s illness or injury. Where the deadline is not satisfied, the employee shall be granted an annual overall presumptive rating equal to their last annual overall rating, but not less than a Satisfactory (“S”) rating. However, if the time for annual evaluation falls during a PPR or warning period (See Disciplinary Action Article, Section 1(e)(ii) & (iii), the annual evaluation shall be waived, and the last evaluation in such process shall be deemed to be the annual evaluation. In the event the time for annual evaluation falls subsequent to the issuance of a notice of performance deficiency (Step 1) but prior to the commencement of a PPR, the employer may issue an evaluation which does not supersede the previously issued notice. A special evaluation may be used at any time except it shall not be used as a late annual evaluation. Written feedback furnished to an employee which would have constituted the annual evaluation had it been timely conducted, shall not be considered as an evaluation, shall not be placed in the employee’s file at the time of issuance, shall not be grievable and does not require the presence of a union representative when issued. An oral or written notice of performance deficiency (Step 1 in the order of progressive corrective action) shall not be grievable when issued, and, when issued, shall not require the presence of a union representative. However, once Step 2 of progressive corrective action has been implemented (a special or annual evaluation coupled with a PPR) such notice or a written record of such notice shall be placed in the employee’s personnel file and shall be fully grievable.

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones:

  • Performance Improvement Process 9.5.1 The purpose of the Performance Improvement Process is to remedy or mitigate the impact of a Performance Factor. The Performance Improvement Process may include: a requirement that the Hospital develop an Improvement Plan; or an amendment of the Hospital’s obligations as mutually agreed by the parties.

  • Timing of Messages With respect to GTE resold measured rate local service(s), chargeable time begins when a connection is established between the calling station and the called station. Chargeable time ends when the calling station "hangs up," thereby releasing the network connection. If the called station "hangs up" but the calling station does not, chargeable time ends when the network connection is released by automatic timing equipment in the network.

  • PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES 8 A. CONTRACTOR shall achieve performance objectives, tracking and reporting Performance 9 Outcome Objective statistics in monthly programmatic reports, as appropriate. ADMINISTRATOR 10 recognizes that alterations may be necessary to the following services to meet the objectives, and,

  • Performance Testing 7.2.1 The Design-Builder shall direct and supervise the tests and, if necessary, the retests of the Plant using Design-Builder’s supervisory personnel and the Air Emissions Tester shall conduct the air emissions test, in each case, in accordance with the testing procedures set forth in Exhibit A (the “Performance Tests”), to demonstrate, at a minimum, compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria. Owner is responsible for obtaining Air Emissions Tester and for ensuring Air Emissions Tester’s timely performance. Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Air Emissions Tester to facilitate performance of all air emissions tests. Design-Builder shall not be held responsible for the actions of Owner’s employees and third parties involved in the Performance Testing, including but not limited to Air Emissions Tester.

  • Development Milestones In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7.1, LICENSEE specifically commits to achieving (either itself or through the acts of a SUBLICENSEE) the following development milestones in its diligence activities under this AGREEMENT: (a) (b).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!