Workload Review Committee Sample Clauses
The Workload Review Committee clause establishes a designated group responsible for evaluating and addressing concerns related to employee workload. Typically, this committee is composed of representatives from both management and staff, and it reviews cases where employees believe their assigned duties exceed reasonable expectations or contractual limits. By providing a formal mechanism for workload assessment and dispute resolution, this clause helps ensure fair distribution of work and prevents overburdening employees, thereby promoting a balanced and sustainable work environment.
Workload Review Committee. The College and the Association will establish a Workload Review Committee no later than September 30, 2001 that will examine the workload inequities created by the discounting of instructional hours, by the unique working conditions in the Aviation Department, and by the increasing demands upon non-instructional faculty. The work of the committee will include:
1. recommending to the College solutions to workload inequities or problems that could be reasonably achieved with current financial resources within the life of the agreement.
2. recommending to the College and Association solutions to the problems above that require more resources than are currently available, for discussion in the next round of bargaining.
3. providing or vetting the local workload information that will be provided to the provincial workload study to be conducted as part of the Protocol for the Common Agreement. In addition, the committee will be responsible for the allocation of the Alocal negotiations@ money assigned by the Common Agreement to the Association and the College that remains after any other compensation items agreed to have been costed. The committee will apply the remaining funds to improving workload conditions in the area(s) of most urgent need as determined by the committee. The targeted area(s) will be identified no later than the end of the first year of this agreement (March 31, 2002). The composition of the committee will be determined after the ratification of this agreement, but Association members will constitute a majority of one.
Workload Review Committee. As part of the University’s commitment to workload management a Professional Staff Workload Review Committee will be established.
Workload Review Committee. A workload review committee consisting of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice-President Academic and the President of the Association shall investigate any alleged or suspected workload inequities reported by Academic Staff and/or Administration personnel. Within ten (10) working days, the committee shall study relevant documents and conduct interviews as necessary; review the assigned workload for reasoned equity across work unit, School and Institute; and report to the Institute and the Association.
Workload Review Committee. The committee will be made up of three (3) members selected by the union and three (3) members selected by management, and each member shall be appointed for a two (2) year term. Alternate members may be identified in occasions where a member’s involvement may create a conflict of interest given the discipline (field of study) being evaluated.
Workload Review Committee. (a) A Workload Review Committee shall be established to deal with concerns related to the quantum of workload unable to be resolved within the faculty.
(b) The Workload Review Committee shall consist of four people being a nominee of the CEO, a nominee of the Section Head/HoF concerned, a nominee of TEU and a nominee of the teaching staff member(s) concerned.
(c) A separate voting chairperson may be appointed.
Workload Review Committee. A committee shall be established consisting of three members appointed by the RPSTA and three members appointed by the Board, to undertake a collaborative problem-solving process to engage teachers at the school level to identify and address issues that result in school division and school improvements with respect to teacher workload. The committee shall review procedures, best practices, school and division programming, and examine factors that contribute to intensification. In witness whereof the signing officers of the respective parties have set their hands at Regina, Saskatchewan, this day of , 2016. Signed on behalf of the teachers of the Signed on Behalf of the Board of Education Regina School Division No. 4 of the Regina School Division No. 4 of Saskatchewan LINC Chairperson – ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Chairperson – ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Secretary-Treasurer – ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Workload Review Committee. 5.6.1 A Workload Review Committee shall be established to deal with complaints of excessive workload.
5.6.2 The Workload Review Committee shall consist of four (4) people being a nominee of the CEO, a nominee of the Executive Director, Learning Delivery, a nominee of TEU and a nominee of the employee concerned.
5.6.3 The Workload Review Committee shall:
(a) set its own procedure;
(b) be required to take into account appropriate contractual provisions in its deliberations;
(c) endeavour to resolve the dispute by discussion with the parties but, failing that, to investigate the complaint (after giving both sides an opportunity to be heard) and then make recommendations to the Executive Director, Learning Delivery.
5.6.4 Recommendations shall be in writing and copies shall be provided to both parties who shall have an opportunity to comment. The Executive Director, Learning Delivery shall receive the written recommendations and any comments made by the parties before making their decision.
Workload Review Committee. 4.5.1 Workload Review Committee shall be established to deal with complaints of excessive workload.
4.5.2 The Workload Review Committee shall consist of four (4) people being a nominee of the CEO, a nominee of the Executive Director, Learning Delivery, a nominee of TEU and a nominee of the employee concerned.
Workload Review Committee a) A Workload Review Committee shall be established to deal with concerns related to the quantum of workload unable to be resolved within the faculty.
b) The Workload Review Committee shall consist of four people being a nominee of the CEO, a nominee of the Section Head/HoF concerned, a nominee of TEU and a nominee of the teaching staff member(s) concerned.
c) A separate voting chairperson may be appointed.
d) The Workload Review Committee will be required to take into account appropriate contractual provisions in its deliberations, and consider submissions from teaching staff member(s) about workload and or workload issue.
e) The Workload Review Committee shall be constituted as set out in subclause 3.1.3 (b), where: . Committee discussions are without prejudice and in confidence. . Invitations may be extended to other parties to advise the committee in its deliberations. . The committee will determine the frequency and length of meetings. . The parties shall negotiate a report back date. Such report to contain a finding where possible and/or recommendations for resolving the workload issue. . The initial submission will be in writing. The committee may seek further oral and written submissions. . All submissions will be given full and thorough consideration by the Committee.
f) The Final Report of the Committee will be provided to the parties.
g) In making a determination in respect of that teaching staff member(s) workload, the committee will attempt to resolve the issue through discussion with the parties concerned.
h) In the event of the initial concern not being resolved by this process, the CEO shall review the matter and make a final decision