Academic Performance Indicators and Evaluation Sample Clauses

Academic Performance Indicators and Evaluation. The School shall: i. Provide a comprehensive educational program that aligns with the state academic standards prescribed by the Department for the grades approved to operate. ii. Participate in the State-required assessments as designated by the Department or the U.S. Department of Education. iii. Timely report student level data for State-required assessments to the Department and report student level data from school administered assessments, as requested by the Commission or on a bi-annual basis if that data is incorporated into the Academic Performance Framework adopted by the Commission. iv. Meet or make substantial progress toward achievement of the Department's standards of excellence. v. Meet or make substantial progress toward achievement of the Department's standards of excellence or the performance standards identified in the Academic Performance Framework as adopted and modified periodically by the Commission. i. The Academic Performance Framework adopted by the Commission allows for the inclusion of additional rigorous, valid and reliable mission specific indicators proposed by a charter school to augment external evaluations of its performance, provided that the Commission approves of the quality and rigor of such proposed indicators and the indicators are consistent with the purposes of the Act. Any such indicators will be incorporated into Attachment A. ii. If the School fails to meet its academic performance indicators in any year it must develop, submit, and begin implementing a School Improvement Plan within 60 days of the release of the academic performance information. The School Improvement Plan will be submitted to the Commission, but the Commission will not evaluate the quality of, or approve, the plan. The Commission may evaluate implementation of the plan through its annual site visits and provide feedback to the School regarding fidelity of implementation and effectiveness of the plan in improving School performance. iii. If the School does not meet the performance standards in the Performance Framework, it shall “make substantial progress” toward achievement of those standards as it is defined in the Commission’s Accountability Plan included in Attachment A. iv. Failure to meet or make substantial progress toward meeting the performance standards shall be sufficient justification to revoke or non-renew the School’s Charter. vi. The Commission is not required to allow the school the opportunity to remedy the problem if unsatisfa...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (27)
Academic Performance Indicators and Evaluation. The Charter Holder shall: A. Provide a comprehensive program of instruction that aligns with the state academic standards prescribed by the Arizona State Board of Education for the grades approved to operate. B. Design a method to measure pupil progress toward pupil outcomes adopted by the Arizona State Board of Education pursuant to A.R.S. §15-741.01, including participation in the Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards test and the nationally standardized norm-referenced achievement test as designated by the Arizona State Board of Education and any other assessment required by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools. C. Develop and meet outcome measures as directed by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools. D. The Charter Holder shall meet or demonstrate sufficient progress toward the level of adequate academic performance as set and modified periodically by the Board. The level of adequate academic performance set for the following school configurations is currently: • A school that serves any students between grades three and eight must meet or exceed the state average percent proficient in reading and in math on the state assessment and has a student growth percentile of no less than minus one standard deviation from the state median growth percentile in reading and in math. • A school that serves students no higher than grade two must exceed the state average scale score on the Arizona Department of Education’s norm- referenced test administered to second grade students. • A school that serves any students from grades ten to twelve must meet or exceed the state average percent proficient in reading and in math on the state assessment.
Sample 1
Academic Performance Indicators and Evaluation. The Charter Holder shall: A. Provide a comprehensive program of instruction that aligns with the state academic standards prescribed by the Arizona State Board of Education for the grades approved to operate. B. Design a method to measure pupil progress toward pupil outcomes adopted by the Arizona State Board of Education pursuant to A.R.S. §15-741.01, including participation in the State required assessments and the nationally standardized norm-referenced achievement test as designated by the Arizona State Board of Education. C. Meet or demonstrate sufficient progress toward the academic performance expectations set forth in the performance framework as adopted and modified periodically by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools.
Sample 1Sample 2
Academic Performance Indicators and Evaluation. The Charter Holder shall: A. Provide a comprehensive program of instruction that aligns with the state academic standards prescribed by the Arizona State Board of Education for the grades approved to operate. B. Design a method to measure pupil progress toward pupil outcomes adopted by the Arizona State Board of Education pursuant to A.R.S. §15-741.01, including participation in the Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards test and the nationally standardized norm-referenced achievement test as designated by the Arizona State Board of Education and any other assessment required by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools. C. Develop and meet outcome measures as directed by the Arizona State Board for
Sample 1Sample 2
Academic Performance Indicators and Evaluation. The Charter Holder shall: A. Provide a comprehensive program of instruction that aligns with the state academic standards prescribed by the Arizona State Board of Education for the grades approved for renewal by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools. B. Design a method to measure pupil progress toward pupil outcomes adopted by the Arizona State Board of Education pursuant to A.R.S. §15-741.01, including participation in the State required assessments and the nationally standardized norm-referenced achievement test as designated by the Arizona State Board of Education. C. Meet or demonstrate sufficient progress toward the academic performance expectations set forth in the performance framework as adopted and modified periodically by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools, excluding all schools subject to the Academic Performance Goals. D. Submit the results and findings from its analysis of student assessment data as required under the terms of the Agreement in Attachment 1 to this Charter. E. Meet or demonstrate sufficient progress toward the academic performance expectations set forth in the performance framework adopted by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools.
Sample 1Sample 2
Academic Performance Indicators and Evaluation. The Charter Holder shall: A. Provide a comprehensive program of instruction that aligns with the state academic standards prescribed by the Arizona State Board of Education for the grades approved to operate. B. Design a method to measure pupil progress toward pupil outcomes adopted by the Arizona State Board of Education pursuant to A.R.S. §15-741.01, including participation in the Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards test and the nationally standardized norm-referenced achievement test as designated by the Arizona State Board of Education. C. The Charter Holder shall meet Meet or demonstrate sufficient progress toward the level of adequate academic performance as set and modified periodically by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools. The level of adequate academic performance set for the following school configurations is currently:  A school that serves any students between grades three and eight must meet or exceed the state average percent proficient in reading and in math on the state assessment and have a student growth percentile of no less than minus one standard deviation from the state median growth percentile in reading and in math.  A school that serves students no higher than grade two must exceed the state average scale score on the Arizona Department of Education’s norm- referenced test administered to second grade students.  A school that serves any students from grades ten to twelve must meet or exceed the state average percent proficient in reading and in math on the state assessment. D. To be included only when a PMP was required. Meet or exceed the Targets of the Performance Management Plan incorporated as part of the Renewal Application and submit an annual report to the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools by August 1, after each school year, for the duration of the Performance Management Plan, in a format prescribed by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools. that details the Charter Holder’s implementation of the Action Steps within the identified Timeline and evidence that the school is progressing toward the prescribed targets which includes a data comparison in chart and graph format depicting the School’s academic student performance and provides documentation of the School’s budget expenditures for the Action Steps implemented.
Sample 1
Academic Performance Indicators and Evaluation. The Charter Holder shall: A. Provide a comprehensive program of instruction that aligns with the state academic standards prescribed by the Arizona State Board of Education for the grades approved to operate. B. Design a method to measure pupil progress toward pupil outcomes adopted by the Arizona State Board of Education pursuant to A.R.S. §15-741.01, including participation in the Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards test and the nationally standardized norm-referenced achievement test as designated by the Arizona State Board of Education. C. The Charter Holder shall meet or demonstrate sufficient progress toward the level of adequate academic performance as set and modified periodically by the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools. The level of adequate academic performance set for the following school configurations is currently:  A school that serves any students between grades three and eight must meet or exceed the state average percent proficient in reading and in math on the state assessment and have a student growth percentile of no less than minus one standard deviation from the state median growth percentile in reading and in math.  A school that serves students no higher than grade two must exceed the state average scale score on the Arizona Department of Education’s norm- referenced test administered to second grade students.  A school that serves any students from grades ten to twelve must meet or exceed the state average percent proficient in reading and in math on the state assessment.
Sample 1
Academic Performance Indicators and Evaluation. The School shall: a. Provide a comprehensive educational program that aligns with the state academic standards prescribed by the Department for the grades approved to operate. b. Participate in the State-required assessments as designated by the Department or the U.S. Department of Education. c. Timely report student level data for State-required assessments to the Department and report student level data from school administered assessments, as requested by the Commission or on a bi-annual basis if that data is incorporated into the Academic Performance Framework adopted by the Commission. d. Meet or make substantial progress toward achievement of the Department's standards of excellence (C or better in the A-F Grading). e. Meet or make substantial progress toward achievement of the performance standards identified in the Academic Performance Framework as adopted and modified periodically by the Commission i. The Academic Performance Framework adopted by the Commission allows for the inclusion of additional rigorous, valid and reliable mission specific indicators proposed by a charter school to augment external evaluations of its performance, provided that the Commission approves of the quality and rigor of such proposed indicators and the indicators are consistent with the purposes of the Act. Any such indicators will be incorporated into Attachment G.
Sample 1

Related to Academic Performance Indicators and Evaluation

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P=Performance Indicator E=Explanatory Indicator M=Monitoring Indicator 2022/23 Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 ≥1 Total Margin (P) 0 ≥0 Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from Home and Community Care Support Services (HCCSS) Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a Quality and Resident Safety Indicators Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a

  • KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • Performance Evaluations Employee performance shall be evaluated and communicated on a yearly basis as required under County policy. Performance evaluations are used to demonstrate to employees that they are valued; record how an employee’s performance meet the requirements of the job; create a job history record; identify employee strengths and areas for enhancement; assist the employee and supervisor in an effort to attain the highest level of performance; and reinforce performance standards. Every effort will be made to include substantiated information within an employee’s performance evaluation. Non-recurring discipline history which is more than two (2) years old will not be referenced in performance evaluations. The County shall ensure employee performance evaluations are conducted in accordance with County and departmental policy. Performance evaluations and disciplinary matters shall only be conducted by County employees. When an employee who does not agree with the overall rating he/she receives on his/her written performance evaluation, he/she shall discuss and attempt to resolve the differences with his/her immediate supervisor. If discussion with his/her immediate supervisor does not result in resolution of the differences, the employee may file a written request to meet with the next level of management. Said request shall state the unresolved issues and the specific changes in the written performance evaluation the employee is seeking. The appropriate manager shall meet with the employee to discuss the unresolved issues. If the issues are not resolved to the employee’s satisfaction following discussion with the appropriate manager, the employee may within thirty (30) working days file a written request for a meeting with the department head. Within fourteen (14) working days of receipt of a written request stating the unresolved issues and the desired changes in the written performance evaluation, the department head shall meet with the employee to discuss the issues. Within ten (10) working days of said meeting, the department head shall respond in writing to the employee. The decision of the Department Head shall be final and not subject to the grievance procedure. An employee may submit a written response to his/her evaluation that shall be placed in his/her personnel file.

  • Specific Performance, Etc The parties recognize that if any provision of this Agreement is violated by the Company, Indemnitee may be without an adequate remedy at law. Accordingly, in the event of any such violation, Indemnitee shall be entitled, if Indemnitee so elects, to institute Proceedings, either in law or at equity, to obtain damages, to enforce specific performance, to enjoin such violation, or to obtain any relief or any combination of the foregoing as Indemnitee may elect to pursue.

  • SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 7.1 The performance of the Employee in relation to his performance agreement shall be reviewed for the following quarters with the understanding that the reviews in the first and the third quarter may be verbal if performance is satisfactory:

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

  • Quarterly Contractor Performance Reporting Customers shall complete a Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit I) for each Contractor on a Quarterly basis. Customers will electronically submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated in Contract Exhibit D, Section 17, Additional Special Contract Conditions. The completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) will be used by the Department as a performance-reporting tool to measure the performance of Contractors. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MyFloridaMarketPlace or on the Department's website).

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 6.1 Administrators will meet with new employees to discuss their job description within one (1) month of hire. The Administrator and new employee will sign off on the job description and it will be forwarded to the Human Resources Department for inclusion in the employee‘s personnel file. The Human Resources Department will compile and distribute a list showing each employee‘s evaluator prior to November 1st of each year. Bargaining unit job descriptions will be made available via the District‘s web site. 6.2 Evaluations will transpire as follows for employees that are receiving satisfactory ratings: a. New hires—regular part-time (school year employees) will be evaluated at three (3) and six (6) working months. b. New hires—full time (12 month employees) will be evaluated at three (3), six (6) and twelve (12) months. c. After the initial year of employment, each employee shall be evaluated at least once annually by March 31st. 6.3 Criteria for evaluating bargaining unit members will be based on the performance categories outlined on the evaluation form as related to the job description of their specific position assignment. 6.4 Evaluation reports shall include feedback regarding strengths and weaknesses (if any) demonstrated by the employee. Prior to an employee receiving a rating less than “Meets Expectations,” the employee shall be advised of the performance concern and provided with a clear statement of any deficiency and a statement defining acceptable performance. This shall occur within a reasonable time prior to the final evaluation to allow the employee a chance to demonstrate improvement. 6.5 In the event an employee is evaluated overall as “Does Not Meet Expectations,” the district, in consultation with the employee and the Association, will provide the employee a written plan of improvement (See Employee Plan of Improvement form in Appendix). The plan shall clearly define all areas of deficiency, provide clear and attainable performance goals, and outline supports (if any) to be given, including any necessary training at the District’s expense. The employee will be given a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed sixty (60) working days, to meet job performance expectations. During the improvement period, feedback will be provided through a minimum of three scheduled meetings. Following the completion of the plan, the supervisor shall notify the employee in writing of the outcome. Failure to demonstrate satisfactory improvement may constitute grounds for termination. 6.6 The bargaining unit member shall be given a copy of their evaluation, and any data collection sheets (with the submitters name excluded) used in the evaluation. 6.7 Under the law there is no right to Association Representation at evaluation conferences. 6.8 Any information shared with the evaluating administrator for the evaluation process shall be recorded on Data Collection Sheet(s), with the exception of those unit members that have supervising teachers. Supervising teachers will work directly with the evaluating administrator to share performance information for inclusion in the unit member‘s evaluation. 6.9 Employees shall have the right to respond to evaluations in writing. Such written response shall be attached to the evaluation if received within 5 days. 6.10 No bargaining unit member shall be required to sign a blank or incomplete evaluation form.

  • Diversity The Employer and the Union recognize the values of diversity in the workplace and will work cooperatively toward achieving a work environment that reflects the interests of a diverse work force.

  • Performance Reporting The State of California is required to submit the following financial reports to FEMA: