Databases searched. Database Search period Embase via Ovid Up to 23 August 2016 Medline via Ovid Up to 23 August 2016 International Pharmaceutical Abstracts via Ovid Up to 23 August 2016 The Cochrane Library (includes Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment, Cochrane Methodology Register) Up to 23 August 2016 Health Systems Evidence Up to 14 September 2016 HTA websites and databases Up to 14 September 2016
Databases searched. Database Search period Embase via Ovid Up to 20 September 2016 Medline via Ovid (1946 to September, Week 1, 2016; Daily update; Most Recently Published; Epub Ahead of Print September 19, 2016) Up to 20 September 2016 International Pharmaceutical Abstracts via Ovid Up to 20 September 2016 The Cochrane Library (includes Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment, Cochrane Methodology Register) Up to 22 September 2016 Health Systems Evidence Up to 22 September 2016 HTA websites and databases Up to 22 September 2016
Databases searched. The keywords from the Facet Analysis were searched using three Electronic databases. Table 3-5 shows the databases included within the search engine, along with descriptions of the literature included in each. The keywords were searched individually and with the search string operators so that a grid of results could be created (Table 3-6). Database Details of literature included EBSCO- Education Abstracts Education database of abstracts from more than 680 periodicals and yearbooks from 1983 onwards. CINAHL- Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature An index of over 5000 journals for the field of nursing and allied health literature. Medline Database with an emphasis on clinical medicine but also includes nursing, healthcare delivery and social sciences. Table 3-5 - Databases searched for literature on identity Following the search, results were reviewed for title and abstract so that the inclusion/exclusion criteria could be applied. Search results were manually reviewed for relevance to the search question and duplicates were removed. After these exclusion criteria were applied to the initial search, the initial 172 papers identified were reduced further where the research had been conducted in other countries or being non-research-based articles. Following this procedure, 9 papers remained (see Table 3-6 for a breakdown of the search results by keywords used). Table 3-7 Shows a summary of the studies that were subsequently reviewed for the analysis. Facet Search string Search results 1 identit* 304,630 self-ident* 2,128 self-concept* 17,290 ident* OR self-ident* OR self-concept* 317,983 2 form* 162,311 construct* 58,260 develop* 441,083 socialis* 688 socializ* 5,032 learn* 103,235 form* OR construct* OR develop* OR socialis* OR socializ* OR learn* 657,036 3 nurs* 664,704 student* 127,880 prereg* 333 pre-reg* 1,464 undergrad* 12,669 under-grad* 66 Nurs* OR student* OR prereg* or pre-reg* OR undergrad* OR under-grad* 744,482 4 profession* 299,099 Facet 1 AND Facet 2 AND Facet 3 AND Facet 4 172 Results after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria and relevance checking 9 Table 3-6 - Database search results Study title Aims of the study Research design Key findings Professional identity as a resource for talk: exploring the mentor-student relationship Xxxxxxxxxxx. P and Xxxx. C. (2008) Nursing Inquiry. 15; pp270-279 To examine how mentors in nursing education make professional judgements about the clinical competence of pre- registration nursi...
Databases searched. Database Search period Embase via Ovid Up to 23 August 2016 Medline via Ovid Up to 23 August 2016 International Pharmaceutical Abstracts via Ovid Up to 23 August 2016 The Cochrane Library (includes Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment, Cochrane Methodology Register) Up to 23 August 2016 Health Systems Evidence Up to 14 September 2016 HTA websites and databases Up to 14 September 2016 Selection of relevant evidence The literature search outlined above identified 48 unique citations. The following a priori exclusion criteria were applied: Wrong population – excludes residential aged care facility (RACF) patients and hospital inpatients. Wrong intervention – excludes studies that did not examine a SS service or similar intervention, and studies that examined the supply of medicines related to opioid substitution therapy. Wrong comparator – excludes studies that compared SS with other pharmacy-led programs. Wrong outcomes – excludes studies that do not assess one of the outcomes outlined in Section 3.1.1. Not in English – excludes studies not published in English language or those that do not include at least some information (e.g. a summary) in English. The exclusion of citations from the searches is presented in Table 3 .3. Table 3.3 Summary of the process used to identify relevant studies and reports Description Embase, Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Cochrane Library Hand searched references Health System Evidence Grey literature Duplicates within and across sets removed 0 Excluded at full text review: Wrong population Wrong intervention Wrong outcome Wrong publication type Total citations excluded at full text review: 0 Total included studies 0 Total included CPA reports 2 Abbreviations: CPA, Community Pharmacy Agreement. The systematic literature search did not identify any studies that fulfilled the PICO criteria. The Pharmacy Guild of Australia was subsequently notified and asked whether they are aware of any relevant studies. The Guild set about searching for evidence but did not provide any studies to the review team. The targeted search of the websites of relevant pharmacy organisations and the Commonwealth Department of Health identified two previous evaluations of the SS initiative, which are listed in Table 3 .4. Section 4 provides a summary of the findings of these eva...
