Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses Sample Clauses

Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and personnel are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators should consider alternatives to suspensions and expulsions and law enforcement officials should consider alternatives to involvement with the juvenile and criminal justice systems for student violations of law.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (17)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators will consider alternatives to suspensions and law enforcement officials will consider alternatives to referrals to juvenile court services and arrests for violations of law. The SLEP shall operate in a manner to ensure children with disabilities receive appropriate behavioral interventions and supports.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators will consider alternatives to suspensions and law enforcement officials will consider alternatives to referrals to juvenile court services and arrests for student violations of law. This Agreement, the School Law Enforcement Partnership Guide, and any relevant guidance from the Department of Criminal Justice Services with regard to SROs are all intended to operate in a manner to ensure children with disabilities receive appropriate behavioral interventions and supports. When appropriate, and to the extent the law allows, the Board should notify SROs of any special needs of a student involved in a school-based infraction that is not routine discipline, in order to assist the SRO in recognizing and accommodating behaviors that may be manifestations of the student’s disability. In accordance with School Board Policy JB, any action taken in response to disciplinary misconduct and/or criminal offense will be administered fairly and without regard to race, national origin, disability, religion, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation or marital or parental status. Information Sharing The release of student records is governed by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. §1232g, and the associated regulations of the U.S. Department of Education as well as Virginia’s student privacy statutes, Virginia Code Sections 22.1-287 et seq., as amended. “School officials” may access and disclose student records only as authorized by XXXXX, its associated Federal regulations and the Virginia Code. In any case of conflict between Virginia law and Federal law, Federal law shall prevail. Consent access. An SRO or other law enforcement officer may have access to a student’s education records with written consent of the student’s parent or of the student if the student is age 18 or older. SRO access. For purposes of access to student records, SR...
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with RPS Student Code of Responsible Ethics (SCORE), SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules, or disciplinary infractions that are not in violations of the law.
Sample 1
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline and the enforcement of school rules and procedures. CCPS will ensure SROs are familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, but in the absence of emergency and/or criminal conduct, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations oflaw. Information Sharing The release of student "education records" is governed by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. §1232g. "School officials" may access and disclose student "education records" only as authorized by XXXXX. SROs are not School Officials but work in conjunction with School Officials and as a part of this MOU will have access to the information as noted in APPENDIX A. Disclosure Statement: CCPS and CCPD will adhere to all state and federal laws/guidelines regarding disclosure of information. GAGGLE Information Sharing Protocol: CCPS has implemented GAGGLE safety management technology that reveals potentially harmful content in student email, documents, shared files, images stored in CCPS school issued student cloud drives. CCPS may disclose to SROs and law enforcement personally identifiable information, including student addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses, of any student without prior written consent of the parent, and without a Court Order, if the GAGGLE safety management technology reveals potential harmful content that constitutes a safety or health emergency. A health or safety emergency would include, but is not limited to, content that indicates self-harm or harm to others, and the notification of images containing nudity/sexual content of aminor. Investigation and Questioning The operations of schools are governed by policies adopted by the school board.1 Furthermore, school principals are responsible for protecting and maximizing instructional time; and controlling and monitoring interruptions disruptions during the school day.2 SROs and law enforcement officers conducting investigations shall be allowed in collaboration with any local Child Protective Services unit shall, in accordance with Va. Code §63.2-1518 state law, be allowed to question a students suspected of being abused or neglected and that student’s sibling(s) outside the presence of school officials, and without the consent or presence of the student's parent or guar...
Sample 1

Related to Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses

  • Professional Development; Adverse Consequences of School Exclusion; Student Behavior The Board President or Superintendent, or their designees, will make reasonable efforts to provide ongoing professional development to Board members about the adverse consequences of school exclusion and justice-system involvement, effective classroom management strategies, culturally responsive discipline, appropriate and available supportive services for the promotion of student attendance and engagement, and developmentally appropriate disciplinary methods that promote positive and healthy school climates, i.e., Senate Bill 100 training topics. Board Self-Evaluation The Board will conduct periodic self-evaluations with the goal of continuous improvement. New Board Member Orientation The orientation process for newly elected or appointed Board members includes:

  • Convicted, Discriminatory, Antitrust Violator, and Suspended Vendor Lists In accordance with sections 287.133, 287.134, and 287.137, F.S., the Contractor is hereby informed of the provisions of sections 287.133(2)(a), 287.134(2)(a), and 287.137(2)(a), F.S. For purposes of this Contract, a person or affiliate who is on the Convicted Vendor List, the Discriminatory Vendor List, or the Antitrust Violator Vendor List may not perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under the Contract. The Contractor must notify the Department if it or any of its suppliers, subcontractors, or consultants have been placed on the Convicted Vendor List, the Discriminatory Vendor List, or the Antitrust Violator Vendor List during the term of the Contract. In accordance with section 287.1351, F.S., a vendor placed on the Suspended Vendor List may not enter into or renew a contract to provide any goods or services to an agency after its placement on the Suspended Vendor List. A firm or individual placed on the Suspended Vendor List pursuant to section 287.1351, F.S., the Convicted Vendor List pursuant to section 287.133, F.S., the Antitrust Violator Vendor List pursuant to section 287.137, F.S., or the Discriminatory Vendor List pursuant to section 287.134, F.S., is immediately disqualified from Contract eligibility.

  • CRIMINAL OFFENCES 8.1 The Licensee acknowledges that the use of XXXXX’s Repertoire without the required licence constitutes an infringement of copyright and is an offence in terms of the Copyright Act 98 of 1978, punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment.

  • No Felony Criminal Convictions Contractor represents that neither Contractor nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives, including any subcontractors and employees, agents, or representative of such subcontractors, have been convicted of a felony criminal offense or that if such a conviction has occurred Contractor has fully advised System Agency in writing of the facts and circumstances surrounding the convictions.

  • Deviation from Grievance Procedure The Employer agrees that, after a grievance has been discussed at Step 2 of the grievance procedure the Employer or his representatives shall not initiate any discussion or negotiations with respect to the grievance, either directly or indirectly with the aggrieved employee without the consent of the xxxxxxx or the Union.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!