Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses Sample Clauses

Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and personnel are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators should consider alternatives to suspensions and expulsions and law enforcement officials should consider alternatives to involvement with the juvenile and criminal justice systems for student violations of law.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (13)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators will consider alternatives to suspensions and law enforcement officials will consider alternatives to referrals to juvenile court services and arrests for student violations of law. The SLEP shall operate in a manner to ensure children with disabilities receive appropriate behavioral interventions and supports.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators will consider alternatives to suspensions and law enforcement officials will consider alternatives to referrals to juvenile court services and arrests for student violations of law. This Agreement, the School Law Enforcement Partnership Guide, and any relevant guidance from the Department of Criminal Justice Services with regard to SROs are all intended to operate in a manner to ensure children with disabilities receive appropriate behavioral interventions and supports. When appropriate, and to the extent the law allows, the Board should notify SROs of any special needs of a student involved in a school-based infraction that is not routine discipline, in order to assist the SRO in recognizing and accommodating behaviors that may be manifestations of the student’s disability. In accordance with School Board Policy JB, any action taken in response to disciplinary misconduct and/or criminal offense will be administered fairly and without regard to race, national origin, disability, religion, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation or marital or parental status. The release of student records is governed by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. §1232g, and the associated regulations of the U.S. Department of Education as well as Virginia’s student privacy statutes, Virginia Code Sections 22.1-287 et seq., as amended. “School officials” may access and disclose student records only as authorized by XXXXX, its associated Federal regulations and the Virginia Code. In any case of conflict between Virginia law and Federal law, Federal law shall prevail. An SRO or other law enforcement officer may have access to a student’s education records with written consent of the student’s parent or of the student if the student is age 18 or older. For purposes of access to student records, SROs are considered “school officials” and may be ...
Sample 1Sample 2
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses i. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations of law. ii. Consequences of student misconduct should be effective, developmentally appropriate, and fair. Interventions and school sanctions should help students learn from their mistakes and address root causes of misconduct. School administrators will consider alternatives to suspensions and law enforcement officiaIs will consider alternatives to referraIs to juvenile court services and arrests for student violations of law. iii. In accordance with School Board Policy JB, any action taken in response to disciplinary misconduct and/or criminaI offense will be administered fairly and without regard to race, national origin, disability, religion, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation or marital or parental status. iv. The MOU shall operate in a manner to ensure children with disabilities receive appropriate behavioral interventions and support.
Sample 1Sample 2
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline. Although SROs are expected to be familiar with RPS Student Code of Responsible Ethics (SCORE), SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules, or disciplinary infractions that are not in violations of the law.
Sample 1
Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses. School administrators and teachers are responsible for school discipline and the enforcement of school rules and procedures. CCPS will ensure SROs are familiar with the school division code of student conduct, the rules of individual schools, and their application in day-to-day practice, but in the absence of emergency and/or criminal conduct, SROs should not be involved with the enforcement of school rules or disciplinary infractions that are not violations oflaw. The release of student "education records" is governed by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. §1232g. "School officials" may access and disclose student "education records" only as authorized by XXXXX. SROs are not School Officials but work in conjunction with School Officials and as a part of this MOU will have access to the information as noted in APPENDIX A. The operations of schools are governed by policies adopted by the school board.1 Furthermore, school principals are responsible for protecting and maximizing instructional time; and controlling and monitoring interruptions disruptions during the school day.2 SROs and law enforcement officers conducting investigations shall be allowed in collaboration with any local Child Protective Services unit shall, in accordance with Va. Code §63.2-1518 state law, be allowed to question a students suspected of being abused or neglected and that student’s sibling(s) outside the presence of school officials, and without the consent or presence of the student's parent or guardian. All other SRO or law enforcement questioning of students on school premises must be conducted in accordance with School Board Policy 6135 which requires that the school 1 Va. Const. Art. VIII, Sec. 7, § 22.l-253.13:7(8), School Board Policies; §22.1-79(1)(5) Powers and duties 2 8VAC 20-131-210(B)(5) Role of the Principal administrator (a) make a reasonable effort to contact the parent or guardian and make arrangements to have the parent or guardian present for the questioning; and/or (b) to be present during the questioning if the parent cannot be reached, or if the parent or guardian cannot be present during the questioning. The interviewing of students - whether suspects, victims, or witnesses - should be conducted privately in an office setting. SROs will take steps to ensure minimal intrusion into the educational experience of students in the school setting. When questioning students, the SRO or law enforcement officer will, if and when appropri...
Sample 1

Related to Differentiating Disciplinary Misconduct from Criminal Offenses

  • Criminal Convictions Grantee certifies that neither it nor any officer, director, partner or other managerial agent of Grantee has been convicted of a felony under the Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002, nor a Class 3 or Class 2 felony under Illinois Securities Law of 1953, or that at least five (5) years have passed since the date of the conviction. Grantee further certifies that it is not barred from receiving an Award under 30 ILCS 500/50-10.5, and acknowledges that Grantor shall declare the Agreement void if this certification is false (30 ILCS 500/50-10.5).

  • No Felony Criminal Convictions Contractor represents that neither Contractor nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives, including any subcontractors and employees, agents, or representative of such subcontractors, have been convicted of a felony criminal offense or that if such a conviction has occurred Contractor has fully advised System Agency in writing of the facts and circumstances surrounding the convictions.

  • Notice of Criminal Activity and Disciplinary Actions A. Xxxxxxx shall immediately report in writing to its assigned System Agency contract manager when Xxxxxxx learns of or has any reason to believe it or any person with ownership or controlling interest in Grantee, or their agent, employee, subcontractor or volunteer who is providing services under this Grant Agreement has been placed on community supervision, received deferred adjudication, or been indicted for or convicted of a criminal offense relating to involvement in any financial matter, federal or state program or felony sex crime. B. Grantee shall not permit any person who engaged, or was alleged to have engaged, in any activity subject to reporting under this section to perform direct client services or have direct contact with clients, unless otherwise directed in writing by the System Agency.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!