Funding Conservation Actions. 1. Funding for implementing conservation actions will be sought from a variety of sources. Subject to availability of funds federal, state, and local agencies may provide or secure funding to support Pacific Lamprey conservation according to their priorities.
Funding Conservation Actions. It is understood that all funds required for and expended in accordance with this Agreement are subject to approval by the appropriate federal, state, tribal, and local appropriations. This instrument is neither a fiscal nor a funds obligation document. Any endeavor involving reimbursement or contribution of funds between parties to this instrument will be handled in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and procedures, including those for government procurement and printing. Such endeavors will be outlined in separate agreements that shall be made in writing by representatives of the parties and shall be independently authorized by appropriate statutory authority. This instrument does not provide such authority. Specifically, this instrument does not establish authority for noncompetitive awards to the cooperator of any contract or other agreement. Any contract or agreement for training or other services must fully comply with all applicable requirements for competition.
Funding Conservation Actions. Funding contributions by the signatories to this Agreement are not mandatory, but there have been numerous federal and non-federal conservation activities initiated for these species to date (Table 5). Federally funded conservation efforts include surveys, predictive habitat modeling efforts, long-term demographic monitoring, and PVA. Non-federal activities include surveys and monitoring, habitat inventories, plant salvage, and the development of this Agreement and supporting documents. Table 5. Conservation Actions and Funding To Date Conservation Action Party Approximate Cost Time Period Federal Funding Xxxxxx’x/White River beardtongue demographic monitoring BLM Vernal Field Office TBD 2008–present Xxxxxx’x/White River beardtongue PVA USFWS TBD 2013 Xxxxxx’x beardtongue botany blitz (local surveys) BLM Vernal Field Office/USFWS TBD May 2009 Xxxxxx’x beardtongue botany blitz (local surveys) BLM Vernal Field Office/USFWS TBD May 2011 Xxxxxx’x beardtongue surveys BLM Vernal Field Office TBD May 2011 Xxxxxx’x/White River beardtongue predictive habitat modeling BLM/U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) TBD 2012-2014 Xxxxxx’x/White River beardtongue surveys BLM/USGS TBD 2012-2013 Xxxxxx’x/White River beardtongue surveys BLM Vernal Field Office TBD May–June 2012 Xxxxxx’x/White River beardtongue surveys BLM Vernal Field Office TBD May–June 2013 Xxxxxx’x/White River beardtongue surveys USFWS TBD May–June 2012 Xxxxxx’x/White River beardtongue surveys USFWS TBD May–June 2013 Xxxxxx’x/White River beardtongue habitat assessment model USFWS $17,318 2013–2014 Private/State Funding Xxxxxx’x beardtongue surveys Utah DNR $10,000 2007 Xxxxxx’x beardtongue surveys Uintah County $7,519 2008 Xxxxxx’x and White River beardtongue surveys Utah DNR $10,000 2008–2009 Xxxxxx’x and White River beardtongue surveys Utah DNR $7,000 2010 Xxxxxx’x and White River beardtongue surveys and habitat inventories Enefit American Oil $25,000 May–June 2013 White shale habitat inventories Enefit American Oil $2,800 October 2013 White shale habitat inventories Red Leaf Resources, Inc. $9,950 October 2013 Table 5. Conservation Actions and Funding To Date Conservation Action Party Approximate Cost Time Period Xxxxxx’x and White River beardtongue conservation agreement and supporting documents XXXXX/Uintah County/ State of Utah $30,000 December 2013– January 2014 Xxxxxx’x and White River beardtongue conservation agreement mapping, analysis, and content XXXXX/Uintah County/ State of Utah $20,000 January–April ...
Funding Conservation Actions. It is projected that Academy habitat protection and Academy Xxxxxx’x research will require the greatest expense during the first 5 years of the Agreement. Funding for the Conservation Agreement will be provided primarily by the Academy/Department of Defense; however, other sources of funding may also be provided. - Federal sources may include, but are not limited to, the Academy, Department of Defense and Service. - State funding sources may include, but are not limited to, direct appropriation of funds by the legislature, Colorado Department of Transportation and Colorado Division of Wildlife. - Local sources of funding may be provided by cities and towns, counties, local irrigation companies and other supporting appropriations and may be limited due to factors beyond local control. It is understood that all funds expended in accordance with this Agreement are subject to approval by the appropriate local, state or federal appropriations. Any endeavor involving reimbursement or contribution of funds between the parties pursuant to this instrument will be handled in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and procedures, including those for Government procurement and printing.
Funding Conservation Actions. Funding, both in the form of monetary and in-kind services, for the Conservation Actions will be provided by Georgia Power, as set forth in the Conservation Actions section and summarized in Table 1. Additional resources may be applied to this project from other sources, but these are outside the scope of this Agreement. The Service has provided technical assistance in the Agreement and permit application development and in providing in-kind services described herein. The GADNR will also provide in-kind services as described herein. Implementation of this Agreement is subject to the requirements of the Anti-Deficiency Act and the availability of appropriated funds. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed by the Parties to require the obligation, appropriation, or expenditure of any funds from the U.S. Treasury. The Parties acknowledge that the Service will not be required under this Agreement to expend any federal agency’s appropriated funds unless and until an authorized agency official affirmatively acts to commit such expenditures as evidenced in writing.
Funding Conservation Actions. Funding for the field-based Conservation Actions, both in the form of monetary and in- kind services, will be provided by GPC in a manner that supports the 5-year repeating rotational cycle for the term of this Agreement, as set forth in the Conservation Actions section. GPC will annually fund approved field-based conservation actions at level not to exceed $44,500 for the duration of this agreement. Additionally, GPC will fund laboratory-research tasks during the life of the agreement period up to a cumulative total of $150,000. In terms of labor and monetary expense, field-based tasks will comprise the bulk of total conservation effort actions each year. Field-based work will be planned in coordination with GDNR and Service. To accomplish the field tasks, GPC will annually hire the services of a qualified mussel survey contractor/firm. GDNR, Service and GPC biologists will always be invited to participate in the surveys or as task oversight. The selected contractor must be recognized as qualified by GDNR and Service. Field-based tasks will be managed by GPC. Principal surveyors must have appropriate State and Federal permits authorizing collection of species listed in this agreement. Laboratory-based work will include molecular genetics research, host fish trials and drawdown studies. It is anticipated that laboratory-based research needs will evolve at a pace that chronologically tracks along with progress realized from discovery and genetic sample material collections from field-based studies. Scopes of work desired for laboratory research will be collectively planned as far ahead as practical in coordination among GPC, GDNR and Service. GPC will contract the agreed scopes of lab work with a qualified research laboratory(ies). Qualified labs will be chosen as candidates for the work by GPC as guided by recommendations from GDNR and Service. GPC will directly bear the cost of watershed-based tasks which include conservation management actions protective of riparian habitat as described above in Section VII “Conservation Actions” throughout the life of this agreement. Additional resources may be applied to this project from other sources, but these are outside the scope of this Agreement. The Service has provided technical assistance in the Agreement and in providing in-kind services described herein. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed by the Parties to require the obligation, appropriation, or expenditure of any funds from the U.S. Treasury. Th...
Funding Conservation Actions. Funding for the Agreement will be provided by a variety of sources. Federal, State and local sources will need to provide or secure funding to initiate procedures and tasks of the Agreement and Strategy. - It is understood that all funds required for and expended in accordance with this Agreement are subject to approval by the appropriate local, state or Federal appropriations. This instrument is neither a fiscal nor a funds obligation document. Any endeavor involving reimbursement or contribution of funds between parties to this instrument will be handled in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and procedures, including those for Government procurement and printing. Such endeavors will be outlined in separate agreements that shall be made in writing by representatives of the parties and shall be independently authorized by appropriate statutory authority. This instrument does not provide such authority. Specifically, this instrument does not establish authority for noncompetitive awards to the cooperator of any contract or other agreement. Any contract or agreement for training or other services must fully comply with all applicable requirements for competition.
Funding Conservation Actions. Since 2004, funding and in-kind services to enact conservation actions have been provided by the BLM and the USFWS. Funding was provided to monitor the status of Goose Creek milkvetch, survey for new populations, evaluate habitat conditions, develop conservation measures, and treat and control leafy spurge on an annual basis. In-kind contributions in the form of personnel, field equipment, and supplies were also provided by the two Federal agencies as well as participating State agencies and volunteers. While it is understood that all funding and other agency resource commitments made under this CAS are contingent upon appropriations by the respective entities, through this CAS, partners anticipate maintaining prior and ongoing funding levels and in-kind contributions for the duration of this CAS. Specifically, the Bureau of Land Management is committed to continue to fund, as budgets allow, the protection, monitoring, and research efforts identified in Table 1. The estimated funding amount for implementing past actions, as described in the Monitoring and Adaptive Management section above, and the anticipated funding amount to implement the conservation actions outlined in this CAS, is identified in Table 2. Table 2. Prior costs ($) demonstrating a track record for funding commitment and implementation of Goose Creek milkvetch conservation actions, and anticipated future expenditures to enact the conservation actions in this CAS. Year BFO WFO SLFO USFWS 2004 11,000 8,000 3,750 2005 6,500 8,000 11,250 2006 6,500 8,000 2007 17,000 8,000 2008 37,000 8,000 7,500 2009 35,000 8,000 5,000 2010 40,000 8,000 2011 13,000 8,000 2012 43,000 8,000 2013 3,000 35,000 8,000 3,750 2014 51,000 8,100 8,000 23,000 Anticipated Future Expenditures 2015 10,000 - 20,000 15,000 9,000 – 19,000 5,000 2016 10,000 - 20,000 15,000 9,000 – 19,000 5,000 2017 10,000 - 20,000 15,000 9,000 – 19,000 5,000 2018 10,000 - 20,000 15,000 9,000 – 19,000 5,000 2019 10,000 - 20,000 15,000 9,000 – 19,000 5,000 2020 10,000 - 20,000 15,000 9,000 – 19,000 5,000
Funding Conservation Actions. 1. Funding for the Agreement will be sought from a variety of sources. Subject to availability of funds Federal, State and local agencies may provide or secure funding to support PL conservation and implementation of conservation measures according to their priorities.
Funding Conservation Actions. From the time of the signing of the 1997 Conservation Agreement and Strategy through 2012, funding and in-kind services to enact conservation actions have been provided by a variety of sources including the BLM, the USFWS, and the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of State Parks and Recreation and Endangered Species Mitigation Fund. Funding has been made available on an annual basis to monitor the status of CPSD tiger beetle population, conduct research, implement conservation actions and monitor results, provide protection, enforce compliance with regulations and off-road vehicle restrictions, maintain conservation area boundaries, and develop and distribute educational materials (Table 2). In-kind contributions in the form of personnel, field equipment, and supplies have also been provided by participants. While it is understood that all funding and other agency resource commitments made under this Amendment are contingent upon appropriations by the respective entities, through this amendment, partners anticipate maintaining prior and ongoing funding levels and in-kind contributions into the foreseeable future. Specifically, the Bureau of Land Management is committed to continue to fund protection, monitoring, research, education and public safety efforts. The Department of Natural Resources, through its Endangered Species Mitigation Fund, anticipates funding surveys of potential habitat to locate additional CPSD tiger beetle populations and/or identify areas suitable for translocations, and to fund experimental translocation efforts. CPSD State Park staff commit to continued monitoring, maintenance and protection of CPSD tiger beetle conservation areas and public education and outreach.
