Hiring Decision Sample Clauses

Hiring Decision. In accordance with Article 3.02(c), the final hiring decision shall be the sole purview of the Employer. The Employer has the responsibility of informing the chosen candidate about the decision.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Hiring Decision. Candidate selection is based upon qualifications, experience and past performance. SHARE seniority will be the determining factor for equally qualified candidates. The hiring manager notifies Human Resources of the selected candidate and provides documentation on an applicant evaluation form regarding the reason for their recommendation.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Hiring Decision. Selection is based upon qualifications, experience and past performance, including documented disciplinary history. Where internal candidates are equally qualified (i.e. they have the same qualifications, experience, and past performance), SHARE seniority will be the determining factor for selection. Employees who have been laid off, or who are facing layoff, and employees returning from Workers Compensation have preference over other internal candidates. If no internal candidates apply during the posting period who are reasonably determined to be qualified for the job, it may be filled by an external candidate.
Sample 1Sample 2
Hiring Decision. The final hiring decision shall be the sole purview of the Employer, who may accept or reject any recommendation made by the Committee. The Employer has the responsibility of informing the chosen candidate about the decision.
Sample 1
Hiring Decision. The Library will send the Union notice of the successful applicant after the applicant has accepted the position. An applicant who does not receive a vacant position or interview may request a conference with the Human Resources Officer to receive an explanation of the reasons the applicant was not selected.
Sample 1
Hiring Decision. Employment decisions made by the hiring unit for ASWs shall be based on criteria established by the hiring unit, however in all cases considerations of qualifications should take highest priority. These criteria shall only relate to an applicant's qualifications for the posted position. Both the University and the Union have acknowledged their shared commitment to upholding the principles of academic freedom and freedom of expression, as outlined in Article IX: Academic Freedom. These principles shall be upheld throughout the course of any bargaining unit employee’s hiring and employment.
Sample 1
Hiring Decision. Client shall base employment decisions or any actions on the Client’s Lawful policies and procedures and recognize that Credential Checks’ employees are not allowed to render any legal opinions regarding information contained in Background Screening Reports. Credential Check will xxxx a “flag” on various results including but not limited to criminal records, motor vehicle violations, discrepancy in information provided on employment verification from the application etc. Client agrees that it will not make any decisions based in part or whole on the presence (or lack of presence) of a flag on the report. Client agrees that it alone is making employment decisions, and that it will do so only (1) after reviewing the full consumer report, not just the flags, and (2) in conformity with all applicable laws. Client shall indemnify and hold Credential Check harmless for any claims arising out of its inclusion (or lack of inclusion) of a flag on the reports it receives from Credential Check.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Hiring Decision. 5.1 The Client acknowledges and agrees that it will remain the sole responsibility of the Client to screen, interview and hire a Carer/Domestic referred by the Nanny Care. 5.2 It is the absolute discretion of the Client to engage and offer a Placement to a Carer/ Domestic. 5.3 All liability with respect to the hiring decision made by the Client to engage a Carer/ Domestic for a Placement rests solely upon the Client. 5.4 The Nanny Care will not be a party to any agreement or contract between the Client and any Carer/Domestic referred by the Nanny Care. 5.5 Once a Candidate is placed as an employee or contractor with a Client, the Client is the Candidate’s employer/principal and has sole responsibility for the employee/ contractor. Nanny Care has no liability or obligations in respect of the Client’s employee/contractor, including, without limitation, in respect of the termination of employment/contract of the employee/contractor for any reason by the Client. 6.1 The Client must ensure that at all times it provides a Carer/Domestic introduced by the Nanny Care with a work environment that is free from any safety or health hazards. 6.2 It is the responsibility of the Client to take out public liability and domestic employee’s workers compensation insurance while a Carer/Domestic is in their employment and is required to maintain this insurance for the duration of the Care/Domestic’s employment.
Sample 1
Hiring Decision i. The hiring decision is generally under the purview of the supervisor. There may be circumstances in which, within the guidelines stated herein and consideration of any Department Director or Human Resources recommendations, the BCC Administrator or Elected Official may exercise the authority to make the final hiring decision.
Sample 1

Related to Hiring Decision

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Selection of Reviewing Party; Change in Control If there has not been a Change in Control, any Reviewing Party shall be selected by the Board of Directors, and if there has been such a Change in Control (other than a Change in Control which has been approved by a majority of the Company's Board of Directors who were directors immediately prior to such Change in Control), any Reviewing Party with respect to all matters thereafter arising concerning the rights of Indemnitee to indemnification of Expenses under this Agreement or any other agreement or under the Company's Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws as now or hereafter in effect, or under any other applicable law, if desired by Indemnitee, shall be Independent Legal Counsel selected by Indemnitee and approved by the Company (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld). Such counsel, among other things, shall render its written opinion to the Company and Indemnitee as to whether and to what extent Indemnitee would be entitled to be indemnified hereunder under applicable law and the Company agrees to abide by such opinion. The Company agrees to pay the reasonable fees of the Independent Legal Counsel referred to above and to indemnify fully such counsel against any and all expenses (including attorneys' fees), claims, liabilities and damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its engagement pursuant hereto. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Company shall not be required to pay Expenses of more than one Independent Legal Counsel in connection with all matters concerning a single Indemnitee, and such Independent Legal Counsel shall be the Independent Legal Counsel for any or all other Indemnitees unless (i) the employment of separate counsel by one or more Indemnitees has been previously authorized by the Company in writing, or (ii) an Indemnitee shall have provided to the Company a written statement that such Indemnitee has reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest between such Indemnitee and the other Indemnitees with respect to the matters arising under this Agreement.

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs. B. Participation on the SAC shall not serve as a basis for the evaluation of any teacher. C. A minimum of three (3) to a maximum of five (5) teachers from each school shall serve on their school’s budget advisory committee formed for the purpose of making recommendations on the school’s general fund budget. Teacher members shall be elected by the faculty. Minutes from such meetings may be requested by the faculty and may be posted on the CTA bulletin board at the school by the Association Representative.

  • Initial Decision Maker The Architect will serve as the Initial Decision Maker pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017, unless the parties appoint below another individual, not a party to this Agreement, to serve as the Initial Decision Maker.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!