Measurable Goals Sample Clauses

Measurable Goals. Initial IFSP meetings (and evaluations and assessments) for all infants and toddlers referred to Part C shall be conducted within 45 days of the referral.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Measurable Goals. DES will monitor all State or contracted programs that provide Part C services in Arizona, for compliance with all Part C requirements. Goal 2: DES will ensure that deficiencies identified through monitoring are corrected in a timely manner.
Sample 1
Measurable Goals. Total meetings with Pediatric Wellness Center pediatricians (Xx. Xxxxx Xxxx, MD and Xx. Xxx Xxxxx, MD) for consultation, mentorship (goal #12) Total quarterly site visits with Pediatric Wellness Center pediatricians (Xx. Xxxxx Xxxx, MD and Xx. Xxx Xxxxx, MD) for consultation, mentorship (goal #4) Objective 2-2. Expand the access to child and adolescent psychiatry clinical consultation for PCPs through the Collaborative Care Initiative (CCI) Consultation Clinic. Continue to expand the capacity of the CCI Consultation Clinic at the University of Florida Total patient slots (hours) available each month for CCI Consultations (total #15) Total psychiatrists available to see CCI Consultations (total #6) Total primary care providers invited to refer patients to the CCI Consultation Clinic (total #80) Total primary care providers who refer at least one patient for consultation in the CCI Clinic (total #50) Objective 2-3. Train UF College of Medicine-Jacksonville pediatric residents to develop skills in providing mental health for children and adolescents. This will effectively expand the capacity of the pediatric workforce of the future to deliver mental health to youth across the country.
Sample 1
Measurable Goals. The parties agree that the following are measurable goals to be used by the parties in determining the over-all success of DSC after the initial term of this Agreement:  The number of new sporting events booked including attendance, room nights generated, visitor spending, economic impact and local taxes generated.  The number of new sporting events and groups serviced through activities such as attendance-building, media assistance, volunteer hours, welcome banners, information tables, etc.  Developing and adhering to guidelines established by the DSC board for the percentage of locally-produced versus national/regional events and repeat versus new events.  Other quality of life indicators tied to the City’s and County’s Strategic Plans.
Sample 1
Measurable Goals. The application shall include— (A) measurable goals, and a timeline for meeting the goals, that the State has set for addressing the assistive technology needs of individuals with disabilities in the State re- lated to— (i) education, including goals involving the provision of assistive technology to in- dividuals with disabilities who receive services under the Individuals with Dis- abilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.); (ii) employment, including goals involv- ing the State vocational rehabilitation program carried out under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 720 et seq.); (iii) telecommunication and information technology; and (iv) community living; and (B) information describing how the State will quantifiably measure the goals to deter- mine whether the goals have been achieved.
Sample 1
Measurable Goals. DES will monitor all State or contracted programs that provide Part C services in Arizona, for compliance with all Part C requirements. Goal 2: DES will ensure that deficiencies identified through monitoring are corrected in a timely manner. Verification: In its quarterly reports to OSEP and through additional specific reporting (as identified on the attached workplans), DES shall submit verification that it has: (1) revised or replaced its interagency agreement(s) among the AzEIP participating State agencies to address all Part C general supervision requirements; (2) aligned policies and procedures across agencies to include general supervision and Part C compliance issues (on monitoring, data collection, contract review and technical assistance); (3) implemented a monitoring system, which includes analysis of data to identify and correct noncompliance and ensuring correction of identified noncompliance; (4) formalized an interagency technical assistance system; (5) revised its ACTS data system to expand data collection and reporting functions, incorporating timely data access and management reporting at the local and State AzEIP offices; and (6) incorporated data elements and reports into the data systems of other Part C participating State agencies. Current Status: OSEP’s 2000 monitoring report found that DES had failed to: (1) Conduct evaluations and assessments and hold the initial Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) meeting within 45 days from initial referral; (2) Individualize, and provide in a timely manner, all early intervention services identified on the IFSP to all eligible infants and toddlers with disabilities, including infants and toddlers on reservations; and (3) Ensure that all service coordination functions are implemented. OSEP’s March 15, 2004 letter following its December 2003 verification monitoring visit to the State confirmed that the State had not corrected these areas of noncompliance.
Sample 1
Measurable Goals. Recruitment of interested community residents to participate in the annual Watershed Masters Volunteer Training Program will be tracked.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Measurable Goals. Goal 1: DES will monitor all State or contracted programs that provide Part C services in Arizona, for compliance with all Part C requirements. Goal 2: DES will ensure that deficiencies identified through monitoring are corrected in a timely manner. With prior written approval from OSEP, adjustment to the Tasks and Activities to Reach Results column listed in this table may be made when necessary to support achievement of compliance outcomes within the required timelines. The Tasks and Activities to Reach Results will be evaluated every six months to determine their effectiveness and any need for change. Any requests for change or amendments will be submitted to OSEP in writing. Objective GS 1: Revise the Interagency Agreement(s) with the AzEIP participating State agencies to address general supervision requirements. GS.1A. Identify the issues that need to be included in the Interagency Agreement(s) with each AzEIP participating state agency (DES, ASDB, ADHS, ADE, and AHCCCS). Summary of progress in quarterly report to OSEP. 3 months1 AzEIP Executive Director, State Interagency Team, Legal Counsel for each agency GS.1B. Convene the State Interagency Team and their legal counsel to draft Interagency Agreement(s). Draft of the Interagency Agreement(s) to OSEP 5 months AzEIP Executive Director, State Interagency Team, Legal Counsel for each agency GS.1C. Publish the Interagency Agreement(s) for Public Comment. Interagency Agreement(s) published for public comment 9 months AzEIP Executive Director GS.1D. State Interagency Team members will have legal counsel review the revised Interagency Agreement(s) that reflects changes resulting from public comment. Summary of changes made in quarterly report to OSEP. 12 months AzEIP Executive Director, State Interagency Team, Legal Counsel for each agency GS.1E. Obtain signatures of parties on Interagency Agreement(s). Summary of progress in quarterly report to OSEP. 15 months AzEIP Executive Director, State Interagency Team GS.1F. File the Interagency Agreement(s) with Secretary of State. Summary of progress in quarterly report to OSEP. 16 months DES GS.1G. Disseminate and implement Interagency Agreement(s). Final Interagency Agreement(s) submitted to OSEP and summary of implementation progress in quarterly reports to OSEP 16 months and ongoing DES/AzEIP Objective GS 2: Align policies and procedures across agencies to include general supervision and ensure compliance with Part C (on monitoring, data collection, contract ...
Sample 1
Measurable Goals. Goal 1: Initial IFSP meetings (and evaluations and assessments) for all infants and toddlers referred to Part C shall be conducted within 45 days of the referral. Goal 2: All IFSPs shall contain the early intervention services needed by the child and family to meet the functional outcomes, which are based on the unique developmental needs of the child and the resources, priorities and concerns of the family. All eligible infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families shall receive the early intervention services identified on their IFSP in a timely manner. Goal 3: Each family has a single designated service coordinator who shall: 1) coordinate all services across agency lines; 2) serve as the single point of contact for the family to help it obtain the services and assistance they need; 3) facilitate timely delivery of available services; 4) seek appropriate services necessary to benefit the development of each child served for the duration of the child's eligibility, and; (5) ensure that all families receive appropriate prior written notice and understand their procedural rights and safeguards. With prior written approval from OSEP, adjustment to the Tasks and Activities to Reach Results column listed in this table may be made when necessary to support achievement of compliance outcomes within the required timelines. The Tasks and Activities to Reach Results will be evaluated every six months to determine their effectiveness and any need for change. Any requests for change or amendments will be submitted to OSEP in writing. Objective EISNE 1: Evaluate the nature and cause of the system capacity issues. Tasks and Activities to Reach Results Verification Target Completion Date Date Completed Lead and Primary Partners EISNE 1A. Investigate personnel shortages to identify the extent and regional variations, which may impact service delivery. Summary of progress in quarterly report to OSEP. 12 months and ongoing AzEIP Professional Development Coordinator, AzEIP Staff Development and Training Project, Technical Assistance Specialist, Management and Information Specialist EISNE 1A.1 With the assistance of the Arizona State Licensing Boards for Speech Language Pathology, Physical Therapy, and Occupational Therapy, determine the total number of professionals licensed in the State. Summary of data in quarterly report to OSEP. 6 months AzEIP Professional Development Coordinator, Technical Assistance Specialist, and AzEIP Staff Development and Training Pro...
Sample 1

Related to Measurable Goals

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out- 4.1.1 the performance objectives and targets that must be met by the Employee; and 4.1.2 the time frames within which those performance objectives and targets must be met. 4.2 The performance objectives and targets reflected in Annexure A are set by the Employer in consultation with the Employee and based on the Integrated Development Plan, Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP) and the Budget of the Employer, and shall include key objectives; key performance indicators; target dates and weightings. 4.2.1 The key objectives describe the main tasks that need to be done. 4.2.2 The key performance indicators provide the details of the evidence that must be provided to show that a key objective has been achieved. 4.2.3 The target dates describe the timeframe in which the work must be achieved. 4.2.4 The weightings show the relative importance of the key objectives to each other. 4.3 The Employee’s performance will, in addition, be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Program Goals CalHFA MAC envisions that these monies would be used to complement other federal or lender programs designed specifically to stabilize communities by providing assistance to homeowners who have suffered a financial hardship and as a result are no longer financially able to afford their first-lien mortgage loan payments or their Property Expenses when associated with a Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (“HECM”) loan, only.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!