Project Monitoring and Evaluation. 13. The Borrower shall:
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. The Recipient shall:
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. 5.1 The Recipient will be required to co-operate with the provision of information and evidence to support the monitoring and evaluation of the delivery of the Project against outputs and outcomes agreed by the Funder, including participation on a telephone, web or face to face interview to review the impact of the Grant and the Project for the Recipient.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. Annual Work Plans and Budgets
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. (a) The Borrower shall monitor and evaluate on an ongoing basis, in accordance with the indicators (the Project Monitoring Indicators) set forth in the Annex to this Schedule 5, the carrying out of the Project and the achievement of the objectives thereof.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. (a) The Borrower shall through SFD maintain policies and procedures adequate to enable it to monitor and evaluate on an ongoing basis, in accordance with the indicators (the Project Monitoring Indicators) set forth in the Annex to this Schedule 4, the carrying out of the Project and the achievement of the objectives thereof.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. The Recipient shall, no later than one (1) month after the Effective Date, appoint an agency satisfactory to the Association and under terms of reference satisfactory to the Association, for purposes of establishment of baselines for measurement under the indicators set forth in Section II.A.1 (b) of this Schedule.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. Monitoring and evaluating Project implementation, and strengthening the monitoring and evaluations capacity of DTE, the BTEB and the BMET, through the provision of the technical assistance required therefore. SCHEDULE 2
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. Strengthening of the monitoring and evaluation capacity of the National Coordination Unit, particularly to use geographic information system-based data and prepare cartographic material on Rural Development Communities participating in the Project. SCHEDULE 2
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. The primary metric to evaluate the effectiveness of removal actions (e.g., sound or carbon dioxide) will be based on catch per unit effort (CPUE) of baited traps in infested ponds. We will also estimate the effectiveness of trapping for detecting crayfish, if present. In addition, we will estimate the proportion of sites occupied pre- and post-treatment via occupancy modeling, as described in MacKenzie et al. (2002, 2006). The conceptual basis for this analysis is that repeated sampling (e.g., using multiple traps within a water body) using traps allows one to estimate the probability that a single unit of sampling effort will detect red swamp crayfish when present. This probability can then be used, along with sampling from a random sample of water bodies to determine which water bodies are occupied after treatments occur. The project team will also use a repeated sampling design and count data from baited trapping to estimate population size of infestations using an N-mixture model (Royle 2004). The sampling efforts will be designed in such a way to be able to estimate abundance in each infested pond pre- and post- treatment to calculate a level of treatment effectiveness. The project team has initial trapping data that indicates water temperature influences capture efficiency of baited traps for red swamp crayfish. To alleviate potential bias associated with water temperature we will include that metric in the analytical model as a predictor variable to adjust model outputs appropriately. DNR will provide the following: • DNR PI as well as other Fisheries Division staff will provide guidance during study design development. • DNR PI will provide assistance with field sampling efforts for sample collection, as required. • DNR PI will assist with manuscript/report development (15%). I-F DELIVERABLES This contract will allow for increased capacity through the Partnership for Ecosystem Research and Management (PERM) with Michigan State University Fisheries and Wildlife Departments to design, conduct, and evaluate innovative control treatments to assist Michigan DNR with implementing the 2017 Red Swamp Crayfish Response Plan to address infestations in Michigan. MSU XX will provide draft interim performance reports which are due 10/30/2019, 4/30/2020, and a final report which is due December 13, 2020 that will contain: Performance reports must contain: 1) a comparison of actual accomplishments with the goals and objectives of the award as detailed in the appr...
