SUB-FACTOR 1 – STAFFING Sample Clauses

SUB-FACTOR 1 – STAFFING. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s capability to provide a technical approach resulting in qualified technical personnel with the skills, practical experience, capability, experience, training, and technical and functional certifications and security clearances to perform the work requirements identified in the PWS. All items identified in Section L, paragraph L.6.1. will be used to evaluate this subfactor. In conducting this evaluation, the following will be considered:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SUB-FACTOR 1 – STAFFING. The Offeror shall provide its proposed staffing methodology/approach. The Offeror shall provide an overall staffing structure and staffing level based on the Offeror’s proposed technical approach to performing the requirements. Offerors shall develop their own proposed number and type of workforce to perform work requirements. Offerors shall provide manpower and man-hours associated with each proposed position. The Offeror shall provide position descriptions for personnel that reflect the technical and functional qualifications in the PWS (PWS Section 4.0, Table 1 and Table 2). All personnel shall possess the minimum clearances and certifications required at the start of contract performance. Position descriptions must reflect actual duties, functions, and responsibilities that relate to the training, technical and functional certifications, education, experience, and security clearance requirements within the PWS. The plan will identify organizational and key position responsibilities to accomplish all requirements to include administrative requirements and optional work. The Offeror’s staffing structure will also include subcontractor breakdown, where proposed. Staffing worksheets that illustrate the proposed staffing methodology shall be provided and will not be counted as part of the mission support page count. However, any narrative discussion accompanying the worksheets will be counted in the page count. Lines of authority must be clear in the delineation of staffing. The proposal should address why the proposed labor categories are the most appropriate for the work to be performed in support of each task. The proposal shall not provide the names of proposed personnel. The Offeror’s proposal shall specifically include the following:
Sample 1

Related to SUB-FACTOR 1 – STAFFING

  • CLASS SIZE/STAFFING LEVELS The board will make every effort to limit FDK/Grade 1 split grades where feasible. APPENDIX A – RETIREMENT GRATUITIES

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.

  • Power Factor The Power Producer shall maintain the Power Factor as per the prevailing GERC regulations and as may be stipulated / specified by GETCO from time to time. The Power Producer shall provide suitable protection devices, so that the Electric Generators could be isolated automatically when grid supply fails. Connectivity criteria like short circuit level (for switchgear), neutral Grounding, fault clearance time, current unbalance (including negative and zero sequence currents), limit of harmonics etc. shall be as per Grid Code.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Table 7b - Other milestones and targets Reference Number Select stage of the lifecycle Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum)

  • Non pre-priced Adjustment Factor To be applied to Work determined not to be included in the CTC but within the general scope of the work: 1.1500.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.