Survey Development Sample Clauses

Survey Development. This task involves development of resident surveys to gather input from residents on general satisfaction of Mukilteo stormwater services. • The Consultant team will develop a draft and final resident survey (on-line and hard-copy versions) to gather input from residents on general satisfaction of Mukilteo stormwater services. An equivalent survey will be prepared in hard-copy and on-line in a StoryMap (Esri ArcGIS) format. The Consultant will provide an electronic copy of the hard-copy survey, ready for printing. • The hard-copy survey will be made available in city facilities and at city events and will include a QR code with a link to the on-line survey and availability of the survey in 3 different languages (Korean, Spanish, and simplified Chinese). • The city will print and mail hard-copy surveys. • The on-line survey will be conducted early in the planning process and will be available on the StoryMap site for at least one month. • The Consultant will prepare a draft and final hard copy survey and provide it to the city, who will be responsible for printing, distribution, and collection. • The hard copy survey data will be input by the city into the on-line survey and compiled into a consolidated set of survey analytics. • The survey will be translated into up to three different languages, including Korean, Spanish, and simplified Chinese. • The Consultant will consolidate all survey responses (on-line and hard copy) and prepare a summary report documenting results. • The Project Hub (Task 1) must first be developed as a repository to share StoryMap presentation of survey and open house results.

Survey Development. This task involves development of a non-scientific community survey to gather input from residents on general satisfaction with stormwater and surface water services, and to identify priority issues. The following assumptions are associated with this subtask: • The Consultant team will develop a draft and final community survey (on-line only) to gather input from residents on general satisfaction with Xxxxxxx stormwater and surface water services and priority issues they would like to be addressed by the SSWS Plan. • The survey will be developed following the City’s “Best Practices for Creating Questionnaires.” The survey will be promoted on the Let’s Connect web site, e-news, social media posts and hand-outs (via QR code) for early pop-up events. • The survey will be conducted early in the planning process and will be available on the Let’s Connect site for at least one month. • The Consultant will prepare a draft and final version of the on-line survey. • The survey will be translated into four languages Spanish, Chinese (simplified), Hindi, and Russian via a QR code that provides a unique link to the appropriately translated survey. • City staff may prepare a hard-copy version of the on-line survey and make this available to the public at City facilities. • The Consultant will consolidate all survey responses (on-line and hard copy) and prepare a summary report documenting results.

Survey Development. The content of the survey was based on a previous qualitative study, in which a framework for end user requirements for e-rehabilitation in stroke care was established (Figure 1). The framework comprises 45 identified requirements, classified into eleven self-determined categories and organized by three self-determined key themes: ‘accessibility’, ‘usability,’ and ‘content’. Accessibility refers to “easy access to e-rehabilitation for all end users, including patients with disabilities as a consequence of stroke.” Usability is “the ease with which end users can use e-rehabilitation interventions for recovery after stroke during their stay in the rehabilitation center and/or at home.”

Survey Development. The researcher used information collected from the literature combined with a comparison of MDSR reporting and notification flow charts (created by PHSRT) to identify potential areas of weakness in MDSR implementation. These identified areas were then developed into survey questions in English and then translated to French by a local consultant. All survey participants spoke French so, further translation into Creole was unnecessary for this audience. The survey is included in Appendix 1.

Survey Development. The data for this cross-sectional study were gathered using a survey as part of the Xxxxx Xxxxx Jonno Initiative’s (BMJ) Supplemental Evaluation in the summer of 2019. The survey tool created for this evaluation was adapted from USAID and CDC’s Reproductive Health Assessment Toolkit for Conflict Affected Women (2007). This adapted assessment also incorporated questions about maternal health modified from the BMJI’s baseline survey, “The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Baseline Survey for Reproductive and Maternal Health Care Intervention at Selected Tea Gardens in Moulvibazar” (2016). Adaptations and initial content edits were completed in English by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, CIPRB staff, and UNFPA staff. The survey was then translated into Bangla by two CIPRB consultants and pilot tested with two tea garden mothers to ensure design and translation accuracy. Five tea gardens (Phulbari, Amrailchara, Madhabpur, Shamshernagar, and Satgao) in the Sylhet Division of Bangladesh were selected by CIPRB staff for the BMJI Supplemental Evaluation. These five tea gardens were chosen by convenience sampling from the ten tea gardens that participated in BMJI from its inception in 2016. Twenty women were recruited from each of the five sites, resulting in a sample of 100 participants. Women in the selected tea gardens were eligible to participate if they had a child under age two years, meaning that they gave birth to a child while the BMJI was active in the tea garden and BMJI services were available to them. BMJI health volunteers, identified women for participation through convenience sampling, as they had worked in the gardens and were familiar with the women who had a child aged under two years of age. Three local CIPRB consultants collected data between June 30-July 12, 2019. The researchers were briefed about BMJI and trained to use the survey tool by UNFPA and CIPRB staff. In each of the five tea gardens, BMJ health volunteers led the researchers to the homes of mothers who were recruited to participate in the survey. The first author entered survey data into a Microsoft Excel database and led the data analysis. Though the Supplemental Evaluation survey had seven sections in total, this sub- study only focuses on four sections: Background Information, Safe Motherhood, Gender- Based Violence, and Emotional Health. Figure 1 shows the relationship between covariates, exposures, and the outcome depict...

Survey Development. In March 2012, we conducted a focus group with nine IPMs and used results to refine the survey. In July 2012 we surveyed IPMs associated with all 64 CDC grantee IPs.(66) We developed the survey as a follow-up to our previous IPM surveys and in collaboration with the Association of Immunization Managers (AIM) research subcommittee. The final survey contained a total of 39 questions, 17 of which focused on IISs – the focus of this analysis.(67) Respondents were able to complete the survey by mailing or faxing the paper copy of the survey, or completing it online. We sent a pre-survey fax to the 64 IPMs one week prior to the survey kit, and AIM sent an email notifying IPMs of the impending survey and survey purpose and providing the link for the online version of the survey. In addition to the paper copy of the survey, the mailed survey kit contained a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page that served as the informed consent, a cover letter, an addressed, stamped envelope, a pen, and a signed copy of Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx’s book, House on Fire as an incentive. We emailed all participants to verify receipt of the survey kit, update contact information and answer any questions they had about the survey. Later we conducted in-person telephone reminders, and AIM sent personal email reminders. The survey period closed on September 20, 2012.

Survey Development. The Consultant shall recommend traveler surveys as part of evaluating VMT and vehicle trip impacts. The Consultant shall implement the NYSDOT’s direction regarding recommended surveys. Surveys of individual traveler’s shall be used to estimate Subtask 3.2 Program & Services Development/Improvement $8,824 ($5,882)

Survey Development. The Community Resource Assessment Survey 2002 was developed by OASAS as a modification of the previous survey for the purpose of updating information obtained from community organizations in 2001. Completion time for this previous survey ranged from 30 minutes to several hours, considering time to obtain data. In order to reduce the time required to complete the survey OASAS made several changes to the survey. The 2002 survey contained questions pertaining to location of organization, programs offered, populations served, risk and protective factors targeted, and use of best practice models. The BCYPP version of the Community Resource Assessment Survey 2002 consisted of the key items established by OASAS as well as additional items that asked respondents to briefly describe individual programs offered by their organizations. These additional items gave the organizations the opportunity to describe the different types of programs offered including those that are best practice models. It is important to note that respondents may or may not be aware of the “best practice” status of their organization’s programs. Likewise, it is also important to note that many organizations did not have ready access to a database with the information requested, hence the responses to the survey may be based on best estimates.

Survey Development. The survey instrument (Appendix 1) used in this project was developed using two major sources: the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and the Primary Care Quality-Homeless (PCQ-H) Instrument. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality developed the HCAHPS tool specifically designed to assess patient experience during a hospital admission (Xxx et al. 2008). The agency sought to address and document disparity across hospitals nationwide through a survey tool, and both the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Joint Commission oversaw its development (Xxx et al. 2008). Prior to this survey, national data regarding the inpatient experience was unknown, both with regard to the patient perception of care and the more objective quality of their care (Xxx et al. 2008). The HCAHPS survey instrument underwent rigorous testing and validation beginning in 2002, including numerous cognitive interviews, focus groups, and psychometric analysis as well as a three-part pilot test (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2017). This tool helps to detail more thoroughly the patient experience (i.e. concerns such as communication with physicians and nurses), while also standardizing assessments in order to compare healthcare systems across the country (Xxx 2008). As this is a nationwide, widely utilized and repeatedly validated survey instrument, this tool was an excellent starting point in the creation of the survey utilized in this research project to address this specific question. The tool used in this project uses questions 1-7, which is the subset of questions regarding “your care from nurses” and “your care from doctors,” and 10-17, which is the subset of questions for “your experiences in the hospital” verbatim from the HCAHPS instrument. These questions are labeled at Q13-27 in Appendix 1:

Survey Development. Utilizing the information collected in task 4.1, the City will develop, with input from the District, an online survey to collect information from property owners as well as an in-depth stakeholder questionnaire to collect key insights to identify and weigh areas of conflict, motivators, barriers (real or perceived) to adopting said behavior.