Work Load Review Sample Clauses

Work Load Review. A study committee consisting of 2 Employer representatives and 2 Association representatives (selected by the Association) shall be established for each building. If a teacher feels that he or she has an intolerable teaching situation involving an inflated class size, the teacher will refer the problem to the study committee. The committee will conduct a study within ten
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Work Load Review. The following steps may be utilized when a Related Service Provider believes his or her work load exceeds the reasonable amount of time necessary to perform required services. 1. Related Service Provider will work to resolve the issue with the building principal. 2. If no resolution is found between the above parties, the Related Service Provider will work to resolve the issue with the appropriate special education coordinator, and the lead therapist. 3. If no resolution is found between the parties in step 2, the issue will be pre- sented in writing and in person with the review committee. The committee will present its findings within 30 days of the meeting to the Superintendent or his designee. The review committee will consist of the lead Related Service Provider, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, either the President or their designee of the unit, the appropriate special education coor- dinator, and the principal of the school/s involved.
Sample 1Sample 2
Work Load Review. It is hereby agreed to sign a Letter of Intent that would outline a process for a study of workload issues based on the considerations: Committees comprising representation supervisory staff where appropriate) and senior management be established for each of the work areas to be considered. These committees would be similar to the committees struck to review the workload of secretarial and library clerks. The committees would review the work areas and recommend targets that would relate to the requirements of those positions. While undertaking this study, the committee will identify work required in a priority fashion in each of the areas to be studied and develop expectations for the areas that will be understood by all parties relation to current staffing allocations. The Board strive to work towards levels identified with the understanding that there are budget limitations in current levels and there may be other influences that could impact what is done. FOR THE BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES School District No. FOR THE UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES Local School District No. January I. lo June LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING NO. THE BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. COLUMBIA) The Board is prepared to issue a Letter of Intent to the effect that we will establish a committee comprising Union and Management that will work toward creating positions of not less than four (4)hours or that will enable employees to be eligible for benefits based on the following considerations. As part-time, regular positions become vacant or new positions created the Union and Board will meet to determine if that position can be combined with another to provide additional hours. The Union and Board will meet to review current positions that are less than four (4) hours to if any could be combined. Decisions to create positions not less than four (4) hours must consider needs of students and the ability of the District to operate in the most efficient manner. No employee currently working more than four (4)hours per day shall be reduced to this. FOR THE BOARD: FOR THE UNION: January to June THE BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. COLUMBIA)
Sample 1
Work Load Review. Tile following steps may be utilized when a Related Service Provider believes his or her work load exceeds die reasonable amount of ume necessary to perform required services. 1. Related Service Provider will work to resolve the issue with the building principal. 2. If no resolution is found between the above parties, the Related Service Provider will work to resolve the issue with the appropriate special education coordinator, and the lead therapist. 3. If no resolution is found between the parties in step 2, the issue will be present­ ed in writing and in person with die review committee. The committee will present its findings widiin 30 days of die meeting to die Superintendent or his designee. The review committee will consist of the lead Related Service Provider, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instrucdon, either the President or their designee of the unit, the appropriate special education coor­ dinator, and the principal of the school/s involved. A. The evaluation year will be from November 1 to October 31. The Employee Performance Appraisal evaluation document shall be completed no later than December 31.
Sample 1

Related to Work Load Review

  • Work Load The professional obligation of academic employees comprises both scheduled and non-scheduled activities. The Guild and the District recognize that it is part of the professional responsibility of faculty to carry out their duties in an appropriate manner and place. As part of this responsibility faculty are expected to play an important role in the recruitment and retention of students, campus and departmental governance, program review, accreditation, planning and mentoring. Faculty commitment to retention will be demonstrated by informing students that they are to talk with the instructor prior to dropping the course. Faculty are encouraged to include a statement to this effect in their course syllabi. While it is understood that course syllabi content falls within the purview of the individual faculty member’s academic freedom, the parties also understand that items required to be part of syllabi in order to maintain college or continuing education accreditation must also be included. Tenured/tenure-track faculty who have less than a full-time contract are not eligible to work any additional assignments including long-term substitution (day-to-day substitution is allowed provided the limits specified in Section 5.2.1.3 are not exceeded). Faculty assignments shall be made in the following priority order: Tenured/tenure-track, pro- rata, overload, Priority of Assignment (POA) adjunct faculty assignments, then non-POA adjunct faculty.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Construction Phase Services 3.1.1 – Basic Construction Services

  • REVIEW OF WORK The Consultant shall permit the City, its agents and/or employees to review, at any time, all work performed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement at any stage of the work;

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Acceptance Tests 11.1 If the Contract provides acceptance tests for Goods and/or the result of Services after their completion and/or delivery to the Purchaser, the acceptance shall only be considered as definitive when such tests have demonstrated the compliance of the Goods and/or the result of the Services to the requirements in the Contract. 11.2 Where the Contract provides for an acceptance procedure in the presence of both parties, at the successful completion of such procedure, the Purchaser shall issue the Supplier with an acceptance certificate which shall authorise the Supplier to invoice the Purchaser for any payment due on such acceptance. 11.3 The Purchaser shall at its discretion be entitled to issue and acceptancecertificate with reserves. The Supplier shall be obliged to remedy any non-conformities within the period set out in the acceptance certificate. Any payment which would otherwise have been due on acceptance may be withheld by the Purchaser in whole or part until the non- conformities underlying the reserves have been remedied.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!