Working methods. 1. Any exchange of information between Europol and the liaison officer shall only take place in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
2. When exchanging information, the liaison officer shall normally communicate directly with Europol through representatives appointed for this purpose by Europol. He shall not have direct access to Europol data files.
Working methods. Soundings are to be done using Automated Hydrographic Survey logging System of any accredited/ IHO approved hydrographic survey software. Digital echo sounder (having accuracy of not less than 0.1 m) shall be used for sounding purpose and Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) / RTKS DGPS (having not less than sub-metre accuracy) shall be used for position fixing. These surveys shall only be carried out if weather and river conditions, condition of equipment and methods of execution and interpretation are, in the opinion of the Engineer, satisfactory for this purpose. The Engineer's Representative may resolve to check echo soundings by means of other methods to measure water depths, such as sounding poles, bar check or lead lines. The Engineers Representative may also order calibration checks of the equipment as and when considered necessary. The Contractor shall cooperate in this respect and supply any manpower, boats and equipment that may be reasonably required for this verification. The Current velocity at every shoal (i.e. at least 3 locations, Starting / Middle / End of the survey area) at 1 m depth from the surface and 1 m above bed level shall be carried out once during the survey period. The Float Observation at every shoal (i.e. 3 tracks are to be observed, one on both the side and one at middle of the channel of the survey area) shall be carried out once during the survey period. Water and Bottom samples are to be collected at two locations (one at the Downstream and other at Upstream of the shoal area) and get it tested for finding the characteristics of the soil and the water.
Working methods. 4.1 All Members will act in accordance with these Community Partnership Terms of Reference and commit to working in the following way (i.e. the “Agreed Ways of Working”): • Being open and actively engaging; • Making things happen; • Adopting a consensus-based decision-making process for all decisions; • Committing to listening and valuing the opinions of others – including those with whom the Members may disagree; • Being positive about working with others; • Encouraging mutual learning and continuous improvement through establishing appropriate ‘space’ and process for reflections; and • Ensuring inclusivity ensuring all people regardless of background have the opportunity to contribute and participate fully to the work of the agreed activities
Working methods. Party B works full-time in Party A, the working hours refer to Party B's personnel system; the place of work is Lishui; Party B can no longer concurrently serve as COO of other listed companies outside the Forsen system(Except New Third Board Company).
Working methods. 4.1 The Party adopting a Recommendation/Deliverable (hereinafter "Material") by incorporating the Material into a document shall be referred to herein as the Adopting Party. The Party originating the Material incorporated by the Adopting Party shall be referred to herein as the Originating Party.
4.2 Preference should be given to referencing. The Adopting Party may reference, in whole or in part, the text of adopted Material of the Originating Party as all or part of the text of draft or adopted Material of the Adopting Party with or without modification of the Material of the Originating Party. ln some cases, the Adopting Party may include (with or without identified modification) text from the Originating Party. ln such cases, when the Adopting Material is known to come from the Originating Party, the Adopting Party shall identify the source of the adopted Material in order to facilitate maintenance.
4.3 ln view of the objectives defined in Section 2 above, the Parties agree that the technical groups of ETSI and ITU should harmonize text as far as practicable and continue to develop their processes for co-operative work.
4.4 lt is recognised that ETSI and ITU may come to different conclusions and reserve the right to publish different texts, as appropriate.
Working methods. 4.1. Each Party will designate a contact person for providing overall direction for the implementation of this Agreement.
4.2. In order to facilitate the implementation of this Agreement, the parties will establish a steering group comprising an appropriate number of UNOG and UEFA representatives. The steering group will meet once every 3 months and will have the main task of monitoring and encouraging the implementation of the Agreement. In particular, the steering group will deal with the organisation of the activities described in Clause 3.1. and Clause 3.2.
4.3. The Parties aim to hold a senior-level meeting at least once every two years.
4.4. The Parties will draw a road map to monitor the implementation of this Agreement.
Working methods. 40.1 Any variation, modification or alteration of any Location, Feature, building, plant, equipment, furniture or fitting for which the Contractor is responsible under the Contract in the process of undertaking the Works will only be with the prior written consent of the Supervising Officer.
40.2 The Contractor shall create method statements and risk assessments for work activities and make these available to the Supervisory Officer at Contract Commencement and at any other time upon request by the Supervisory Officer or upon update by the Contractor.
40.3 The Contractor shall be expected to promote best environmental practice and in undertaking all its tasks and plan activities accordingly, which should include effective risk assessments and control methods, method statements and waste management plans. All personnel working on site must have a basic environmental competence and awareness.
Working methods. 5.1 All Members will act in accordance with these CP TOR and the Code of Conduct (Schedule 3).
Working methods. 6.1 The Joint Partnership Working Group will report to the Director General of Health.
6.2 The first activity of the Joint Partnership Working Group will be to review the draft Arrangement document (which will include a review of the draft ToRs for both the Steering Group and these ToRs for the Joint Partnership Working Group) and propose final drafts to the Director General of Health for his consideration and then for consideration by Development Partners and signature.
6.3 Once the Arrangement is signed, the Joint Partnership Working Group will report to the Director General of Health through the Steering Group.
6.4 The Ministry of Health will make a brief progress report to the Joint Partnership Working Group at each meeting, highlighting progress or constraints and including a report of financial expenditure.
6.5 The Joint Partnership Working Group will draw up for approval by the Steering Group a set of rules, which would define what decisions or levels of decision (eg in financial re-allocations, or allocations of resources for TA) are delegated to the Joint Partnership Working Group and what level of decisions required referral to the Steering Group.
6.6 The Joint Partnership Working Group will submit a report of its activities and decisions to each Steering Group meeting. This may be in the form of the minutes of the meetings.
6.7 The Joint Partnership Working Group will present recommendations to the Steering Group for consideration of approval.
Working methods. Technical environment and requirements The GSA website is currently hosted externally and provided for under a separate contract, however the contractor must be ready to migrate the sites to new servers if needed/as requested (either externally or possibly within the EU’s data centre (DIGIT). The GSA website is currently managed with the content management system (CMS) Drupal, but for future developments the use of the GSA's web content management system will be considered on a case by case basis. All web developments should use the GSA’s standard IT technical tools as well as be in line with the Inter Institutional Style Guide. Both sites shall operate upon this CMS and will depend upon a relational database system (RDBMS) that conforms to international SQL:2008 standard, initially MySQL. The site is being developed using the international Java standards JSR-168 and JSR-286 and this will allow the GSA sites to act as, and be built using, portlets. This facility enables greater flexibility, allows for easier management of the sites’ user interface elements and enables the use of other third-party portlets to enrich the overall sites. The contractor is expected to be able to develop new portlets for the site as requested by the GSA using the Java standards mentioned. The hosting service is sourced separately and will confirm to uptime and downtime requirements as laid out by the GSA. The contractor is expected to be able to run tests and provide documentation to show how any downtime has affected the overall availability of the site. Additionally, test results and documentation will be needed to be able to show that any unexpected downtime was caused by the hosting service or by the contractor. The contractor will carry out work either:
a) At his premises and using his own infrastructure. He must have access to all the technical equipment and means of communication required to perform the tasks, including the occasional hosting of an application if required. The offer should include a description of the infrastructure and equipment available to perform the contract.
b) At a GSA premises. The GSA may request the contractor to provide either full or part-time onsite support at a GSA facility. The offer should include a description of the infrastructure required on site to perform activities at the GSA.
